By: MarkJ - 26 November, 2009 (12:47 PM) - Score: 3194 - Fixed Line Broadband
The government's plan to impose a £0.50p tax on all fixed phone lines (Next Generation Fund) to help fund the rollout of next generation broadband services around the UK will also be subject to Value Added Tax (VAT). Assuming the rate returns to 17.5% at the start of next year then this would push the tax up from 50p to 58.75p per line.

The information surfaced through leaked government documents seen by The Times; elsewhere the documents confirm everything we already knew. The new tax upon a tax (don't you just love our government) proposal is likely to fuel opposition voices to what is already a very controversial subject.

A spokesman for UK ISP TalkTalk , which has already warned that 100,000 low-income homes might lose their broadband lines because of the tax (here) , said: “The original 50p a month tax is regressive and unfair. On top of all this now the Treasury will steal yet more off homes in VAT.

The Digital Britain report set a target of 2017 for 90% of UK homes and businesses to be within reach of next generation broadband lines by 2017 (here). The tax was pegged to pocket up to £175 million a year towards the plan.

Concerns have also been raised about the government’s intention to keep the tax going, even after if its 2017 target is met (i.e. like road tax, which doesn't seem to get spent on roads). There are also fears about the difficulty in gaining fair distribution of the money itself, how the government might define a fixed phone line in the first place and the fact that the tax might not be enough to do the job.

The 50p tax certainly seems to have plenty of opponents right now. However, playing devil’s advocate for a moment, we can't see how - without a cut in the fibre tax (we think that would be a better idea) - private sector investment alone will solve the digital speed divide, well maybe in 15 or 20 years but that is surely unacceptable.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 5

asa logoMatt Law
Posted: 26 November, 2009 - 2:45 PM
Link to comment

I thought BT was a profit making business? It seems BT is happy to pay dividends, not so keen on investment.

We need more competition, not tax subsidies if we want to improve our infrastructure.

If BT, like our Banks, has become to big to fail. It should be broken up.
asa logocurtis
Posted: 26 November, 2009 - 7:54 PM
Link to comment

Yet another tax on the public to pay for the House of Lords pay rise this is one big joke, I'm sorry BT need to be broken up the shareholders are put first and I bet 60% + are mp's & in the house of lords & the customer is well at the bottom of the list?
asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 27 November, 2009 - 7:02 AM
Link to comment

Simply bizarre! Three minutes ago I was fairly supportive of this - it's an inconsequential amount of money that, used properly, might actually do some good. But just on principle this is plain wrong. You just don't do this. It may seem all joined up, smug and New labour to Mandleson and his mates, but given the Red Top treatment, that'll be a few more votes down the drain.
asa logoMrJ
Posted: 27 November, 2009 - 10:07 AM
Link to comment

Why the BT rants for? BT has done nothing wrong...

Why can't BT make profits? If they were making loses each year, then what's the point of it being in business?

BT isn't getting bigger, due to competition it is getting smaller and smaller.
asa logosaladin
Posted: 27 February, 2010 - 4:35 PM
Link to comment

as soon as the tax comes in my phone line goes,in comes a dongle and mobile phone instead. i hope many others will follow,mind you the easy way out is to get rid of labour come the election



Generated in 0.65471 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).