By: MarkJ - 20 January, 2010 (8:56 AM) - Score: 2233 - Fixed Line Broadband, Piracy
p2p piracyThe British Phonographic Industry ( BPI ) has hit back at UK broadband ISPs ( BT and TalkTalk ) who claim that the cost of introducing tough new measures to tackle file sharing piracy could push up customer bills by an extra £25 per year. Two reports commissioned by the music industry have now put that figure at closer to 24p per individual ISP subscriber.

The debate about cost centres around the recent Digital Economy Bill (here), which aims to tackle illegal music, film and software file sharing (P2P) among broadband consumers. Unsurprisingly both sides of the fence continue to highlight radically different figures and perceptions with a natural degree of biased to their own respective arguments.

Music Week notes how a new BPI commissioned report from Sweet Consulting has hinted that the first year cost for ISPs could be as low as £13.85m, dropping to £9m in the second year and £3.45m in the third. A similar report by NERA Economic Consulting found that the average annual cost for just the notification (warning letter) system would be £8.5m.

It's estimated that the warning system alone could add about £1.40 to each customer’s bill, though modifying their accounts is an extra £25 per year. Even the government has conceded that the scheme might cost £500m to impose. Ironically the music industry predicted a loss of £200m to piracy in 2009, although that appears to have been based off an incorrect 'one download equals one lost sale' basis.

In reality it is incredibly difficult to gauge such costs before the details of how the system will work have been completely finalised. Clearly there is a huge gap between the estimates of both sides and this casts doubt on all such measurements.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 5

asa logoCarrot63
Posted: 20 January, 2010 - 11:43 AM
Link to comment

To which ISPs and just about everyone else who isn't a cabinet minister might respond that the BPI and friends have been exaggerating the scale of industry 'losses' for years. I'd be fascinated to know how much of downloading is really lost revenue and how much is people just saying "if it's free I'll take it", but wouldn't pay even a modest fee for a downloaded track.

They should get their collective noses out of the coke bag and come up with a business plan that values music at a price the modern consumer is prepared to pay; very little I imagine.
asa logotom.higgy
Posted: 20 January, 2010 - 2:11 PM
Link to comment

What about smaller ISPs where the cost of enforcement will be much higher for them to handle? The increase per subscriber will surely be more for these smaller ISPs with only hundreds to a few thousand subscribers.
asa logotimeless
Posted: 20 January, 2010 - 7:50 PM
Link to comment

all l see are major conflicts of interest, these associations say they are loosing money, yet they make more than enough already selling things at extortionate prices because they are allowed to do it, and they are unwilling to explore cheaper digital alternatives because they would loose revenue as a result, this news article also shows a disinct lack of interest in learning about the technoligy as well.

we pay enough already and we have already or will get another 50p on top of our bills they just want us to dip into our wallets more for the pure sake of adding to their already bulging wallets and bonuses.
asa logoAgrajag
Posted: 21 January, 2010 - 12:38 AM
Link to comment

The BPI and their reports, gawd bless 'em.

Personally I'd like to see a lot more independent reports.

Still, the government seems to hang on their every word so they'll probably get their way in the end.
asa logochubbs
Posted: 21 January, 2010 - 6:59 AM
Link to comment

just seems as if mandelson trying to line his pockets again with a little help from his friends.
The early scheme of having isps act as police, judge & jailer was criminally insane.
And the latest brilliant idea of spending 500M to save 200M is just pure New Labor
...and theexcuses the bpi come up with are hysterical - choking off new bands is their job, the Net has provided a major opportunity to breakthrough - and they hate that they can now be sidelined



Generated in 0.58667 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).