By: MarkJ - 2 September, 2010 (1:02 PM) - Score: 11005 - Fixed Line Broadband, Statistics
virgin media ukCable giant Virgin Media has published the results of a new ICM survey, which was conducted with 1,000 UK adults during July 2010. The study found that 9 out of 10 consumers still find current broadband ISP advertising to be misleading. In response Virgin has pledged to publish the typical average speeds its customers receive each month across its 10Mb, 20Mb and 50Mb services.

The research identified broadband speeds as second only to price when choosing a broadband provider. But the vast majority of people (90%) find it difficult to compare different services because they can’t be sure of the speed they’ll actually receive.

Jon James, Executive Director of broadband, at Virgin Media, said:

"People are paying for faster and faster broadband but being ripped off by unscrupulous providers who can’t deliver their promised speeds to even a single customer. A change in advertising is urgently needed to build consumer confidence in super-fast broadband and the industry more generally.

In the meantime, I hope other ISPs will quickly follow Virgin Media’s lead by disclosing their own monthly performance data so people can make an informed decision about how to spend their money."

There is a clear appetite for change, with 93% of respondents agreeing that the rules should be tightened to prevent ISPs making a speed claim unless it matches the typical "real world" experience of a clear majority of customers.
Survey Highlights

* Only 9% of people think advertised broadband speeds tend to be accurate

* Only 2% of people believe the approach of advertising “up to” speeds is the clearest or most helpful way to advertise broadband speeds

* 93% of people believe ISPs should only advertise the typical speed received by the majority of customers

* 94% of people believe broadband providers should advertise consistent information about broadband speeds – so they can reliably compare speeds

* The research highlighted widespread cynicism towards current broadband advertising – 54% of people are unsurprised when shown the difference between advertised and actual speeds

* 41% of people are willing to pay more if they can be sure of a faster broadband connection
Virgin's position is easy to understand, not least because it continues to come top of the pack in most consumer broadband speed tests. Ofcom also praised Virgin Media's up to 10Mb and up to 20Mb services for delivering average speeds more than twice as fast as its DSL ( up to 8Mb ADSL, 24Mb ADSL2+ ) competitors, with around 90% of the headline speed being delivered to Virgin Media customers.

It goes without saying that many of the larger DSL providers, such as BT , TalkTalk , Orange , O2 and Sky Broadband UK, would probably be less inclined towards adopting Virgin Media's solution because it would paint many of them as being significantly slower. However some smaller and faster DSL providers would probably jump at the chance to show their merits against the big boys.

It's important to point out that Virgin Media defines the typical speed as the average speed received by 66% of customers over a 24 hour period. We also think they could go further by presenting the typical average directly on their broadband product pages, as opposed to being in a separate section.
Virgin Media's "Speedhonesty" Page
http://www.virginmedia.com/speedhonesty

Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 3

asa logoMatt
Posted: 2 September, 2010 - 2:32 PM
Link to comment

Of course Virgin would say that.

Their technology can always give the line rate that the customers pay for. It does not matter how far they are away from their 'exchange' or UBR in their case.

xDSL is a completely different kettle of fish, as they know. If any xDSL provider did the same thing, it would ALWAYS paint VM as the best provider, ever.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 2 September, 2010 - 2:47 PM
Link to comment

Indeed and perhaps consumers deserve to know that. At the very least it might encourage more focus on fibre optic based alternatives and greater honesty. In any case Virgin Media aren't screwing anybody over here, they're just capitalising on their advantage, which is fair gain for a competitive market.

I am most surprised that they haven't done it sooner.
asa logoChisB
Posted: 2 September, 2010 - 3:45 PM
Link to comment

Perhaps if the monthly charge were based upon actual speed experienced by individual customers the ISP's would be more inclined to invest. This would of course favour those ISP's who "gambled" in the early years, encouraging them to expand their fibre optic network.
It would also see diminishing returns for those ISP's who have, in my opion, "wasted" capital enhancing an antiquated system in the interests of short term profits.
I'm afraid that honesty is definately not the best policy for the majority of ISP's.

Leave a comment


baffled cheese confused cool frown glee laugh mad mixedup noexpression sad sadder shifty shocked smile smirk timid tongue whatever wink 



Characters left (comments containing swear words may not be saved)

Please MAKE A COPY OF YOUR COMMENT so you can re-post if an error occurs.

Enter this code in the field below.
Security Image






Generated in 0.51046 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).