By: MarkJ - 30 June, 2011 (7:54 AM) - Score: 2364 - Fixed Line Broadband
uk fibre optic broadband cableuk mapThe government's Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) office, which has been given the responsibility for increasing access to broadband in poorly served areas across the country, has quietly put out a tender worth between £750m and £2bn +vat for a new national framework agreement to help achieve its targets.

At present BDUK only has a budget of £530m (rising to £830m by 2017), which it claims will help 90% of "people in each local authority area" to access a superfast broadband (25Mbps+) service by 2015. Sadly the last 10% will have to make do with a minimum download speed of 2Mbps (i.e. Universal Service Commitment).

The estimated value of the new tender is based upon the total level of public subsidy (including any EU funds) and private sector investment expected to be put towards the funding of projects. In other words, the maximum of £2bn isn't all government money. BT is already using a 50/50 style split approach (match-funding) and that is also the government's preferred solution.

BDUK Tender Quote

"BDUK is seeking to establish a framework agreement of suitably qualified suppliers capable of delivering local broadband projects as required by local bodies or groups of local bodies in regions throughout the UK. Further details of the "local bodies" who may make call offs under the framework agreement are included in Section VI.3.

The framework agreement is expected to be the procurement vehicle for the majority of local broadband projects once they have been allocated BDUK funding. There may be a small number of local broadband projects that do not use the framework agreement and this will be agreed with BDUK."

According to Computing, up to 12 qualified suppliers will be needed to take part and all must be capable of delivering a range of broadband services with related requirements. Some of the key requirements have been set out below, including the need for any services to be "open access" and able to reach up to 500,000 premises (homes and businesses).
Supplier Requirements

* The design, build, implementation and operation of wholesale broadband networks. Call offs may be at the equivalent of a sub-county, county, multi-county or regional level and such areas could potentially be up to the order of 500,000 premises. As a minimum a supplier will need to have the capability to deliver at least one local project as defined in the Pre-Qualification Questionnaire.

* Broadband solutions that meet outcomes-based specifications rather than being tied to specific technologies and platforms.

* Open access wholesale services including those that can be made available by retail service providers (e.g. Internet Service Providers) as part of their retail broadband packages for business and residential customers.

* Related services including (but not limited to) marketing services, demand stimulation and ancillary services. It is currently anticipated that the initial term of the framework agreement will be two years with the possibility / option to extend this by up to 2 one year extensions, making a maximum possible term of 4 years.

Following completion of each design, build and implementation phase, it is anticipated that call off contracts will run for a minimum operational period of seven years essentially in order to comply with State aid requirements relating to open access.
So far BDUK is known to have allocated over £100m of its initial budget to around eight superfast broadband pilots, with the most recent batch of funding (£50m) being distributed last month (here) to projects in Wiltshire (England) - £4m, Norfolk (England) - £15m, Devon and Somerset (England) - £30m.

At the time BDUK claimed that a further announcement, which would cover funding for every local authority in the country, was expected to be made "later this year". An additional 18 local authorities are known to have bid and will receive funding before 2015. Some areas were also warned of the need to revise their plans in order to better fit into the governments cash strapped budget.

It's understood that interested suppliers will now be invited to attend a special briefing session via teleconferencing on 5th July 2011, where a Pre-Qualification Questionnaire will be presented in order to help the government make its decision.
BDUK Tender: UK-London: telecommunications services
http://www.publictenders.net/tender/109632
UPDATE 1st July 2011

Some people were quick to spot that the Tender also required suppliers to deliver speeds of between 15Mbps and 50Mbps. The lower end is well below the governments own minimum target of 25Mbps+, although they claim that this is just a guide and has not changed their original goal. We'll have more on this later from INCA.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 10

asa logoboggits
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 9:16 AM
Link to comment

So they've given up any pretence of local project and are giving the money to BT.... or am I just being a cynic?
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 9:40 AM
Link to comment

I can't think of many other suppliers that would be able to meet their requirements, although the clause about "capability to deliver at least one local project" suggests that there is room for smaller operators.

The real question is whether or not the Fujitsu lead initiative gets involved, although their design appears to lack a degree of credibility.
asa logoLegolash2o
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 9:50 AM
Link to comment

Didn't Fujitsu mentioned 1Gbps, 5 million homes if they got £500m aid. Haven't heard about that in a while :(
asa logoLegolash2o
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 9:52 AM
Link to comment

MarkJ, just to add... Is it possible if you can get an update on the Fujitsu plans please?
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 10:44 AM
Link to comment

Hi Legolash2o,

I'm already on it, although I suspect that this is somewhat of a "no comment" situation until the issue over BT's PIA product pricing has been resolved either one way or the other.
asa logoVM
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 1:01 PM
Link to comment

I disagree with the government. They should put £750m and £2bn to the NHS services instead !!!!

Never mind broadband! NHS is more IMPORTANT.
asa logoHill
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 1:10 PM
Link to comment

The HHS reguarly gets more then 2 billion funding from the goverment- so it doesnt need more money, just better management.

Interesting to see the goverment and BDUK putting up a larger sum of money- though if it incrases BT's rollout across the country then its good for all area's with slow service.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 1:49 PM
Link to comment

Yes you could put all of the money into education, police, hospitals and all those things.. fund the public sector to death, why not? Then after all of that you'd be called 'Greece' because tax from your economy wouldn't bring in enough money to pay its own wages.

Broadband generates business, which creates jobs, boosts income and that in turn returns stronger revenue from national taxation and helps living standards. Improving the country's broadband pays for itself and that will in turn feed back into the wider economy, including the NHS.
asa logoLegolash2o
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 3:36 PM
Link to comment

Well said Mark :)
asa logoMark
Posted: 30 June, 2011 - 9:51 PM
Link to comment

(copies and pastes MarkJ's rather excellent quote into the local broadband campaign document)

:-)

The one subtle but key underlying difference is surely that all the other services you mention are state provided or at least state funded; that the state has some control over them.

Sadly I think we're still a very long way from some formal recognition that broadband is an essential utility or that it helps to achieves the things you state.



Generated in 0.32347 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).