By: MarkJ - 15 September, 2011 (8:14 AM) - Score: 2132 - Fixed Line Broadband
fibre optic cablecountry land and business association ukThe Country Land and Business Association (CLA), a land owners lobby group that covers England and Wales, has warned that BT's currently projected deployment of superfast broadband ( FTTC / FTTP ) services will not go far enough and leave the "final third" (33%) of UK homes and businesses "without a decent infrastructure".

The comments come just two days after BT announced the next phase (8) of its rollout, which will see an additional 114 telephone exchanges being upgraded to support the new services by Autumn 2012 (here). The association welcomed this news but warned that BT's primary motive "is making the already-fast faster".

CLA President, William Worsley, said:

"We welcome BT’s expectation to make super-fast fibre optic broadband available to two-thirds of UK homes and businesses by the end of 2015, although these are places that already have a decent broadband service.

BT should focus on those rural areas with barely adequate broadband or none at all. The final third of the country still lacks any broadband service and will be even further behind by 2015.

We recognise a Public Private Partnership is needed to address the needs of supplying broadband to the most rural and remote areas. If the Government is determined to have the best broadband network in Europe, it must work to encourage public and private partnerships and projects to bring faster technologies to rural Britain."

In fairness a small portion of BT's deployment, such as through the earlier announced expansion to 41 "market towns" (here), have gone towards more rural or rural-ish areas. Crucially this will also be expanded through funding from the governments Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) office.

The BDUK office aims to ensure that 90% of "people in each local authority area" can access a superfast broadband (25Mbps+) ISP service by 2015, although the remaining 10% have only been promised a minimum download speed of at least 2Mbps.

However the scope of BDUK's investment and thus deployment flexibility is typically focused more tightly towards major suppliers, such as BT , Fujitsu Telecom and KCOM ( KC ). As a result the money is less likely to be used in funding projects that involve smaller operators, which are sometimes cheaper and better equipped to handle remote locations.

It is worth remembering that most of BT's already announced deployments have been related to its original plan and has not fully included rural areas that could be upgraded through match-funding with BDUK money. BT's FTTC coverage will almost certainly extend beyond 66% but at this stage we do not know when or by how much. BT itself would love to reach 90% but this requires almost all of the BDUK funding, which is a tough sell even for the government.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 8

asa logoJono
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 11:33 AM
Link to comment

BT is ignoring non rural areas... I just can't believe Warrington is being ignored still! Can anyone give me a reason why it would be?
asa logoBig Bad John
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 12:06 PM
Link to comment

The whole thing has been a farce from the start. Bt just thinks about the exchanges which hold larger numbers of customers. Anything that is in a "true" rural area will probably not get past the last 10 - 20% (2Mbps).
The only way to get faster broadband is to move to a better location.
asa logoBT
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 12:14 PM
Link to comment

The only way is to sack all the BT's management and ban all BT shareholder's stake!

"I really H A T E BT" BT is an ET!
asa logoBig Bad John
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 12:21 PM
Link to comment

Wasn't BDUK set up by the politician Jeremy Hunt ? I think there must of been a typo on his surname it should have been ..
asa logoBerks
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 6:29 PM
Link to comment

In Warrington you have a large selection of LLu. suppliers and VM coverage, so the situation there is not bad at all. Will proably find that due to you're location that the amount of urban sprawl that its taking BT a while to roll their service out in the area's.

John, exchanges will smaller numbers have been enabled ahead of larger numbers, there was a rolling plan that was abandoned in favour of a system where when resources would allow the planned phases to go ahead faster. Delays on one exchange delay the rest, there are only so many engineers in each area.
asa logoNew_Londoner
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 9:52 PM
Link to comment

Hardly news when a lobbying organisation promotes a programme of investment by others in areas where its members own tracts of land, thus raising their land values!

How does teh CLA know that the "final third" will miss out when the government target is to have 90% of the population in each local authority area covered, and when none of the BDUK tenders has completed? A bit premature to make pronouncements perhaps?
asa logoBig Bad John
Posted: 15 September, 2011 - 11:24 PM
Link to comment

New_Londoner
I think the CLA are just looking at the exchanges that BT have listed for upgrade. Realising that there are no villages on the lists only market towns, they are worried that the take up will not reach to the deeper depths of rural UK.

They are a fretting a little bit. But you have to understand that people in far / hard to reach rural areas have always been left behind (not just broadband) and we have had enough.
asa logoRural Shropshire Business
Posted: 9 February, 2012 - 9:05 PM
Link to comment

Shropshire is barely mentioned though it offers an indigent Internet access to its rural businesses. Compared to countries such as Belgium, France, Germany and even Eastern European countries, the UK lags behind most if not all other European countries.



Generated in 0.63023 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).