By: MarkJ - 9 November, 2011 (8:12 AM) - Score: 2869 - Fixed Line Broadband, Piracy
virgin media uk broadbandtalktalk ukThe Motion Picture Association (MPA), an international rights holder for the film industry, has sent a new letter to two major broadband ISPs, TalkTalk and Virgin Media UK, which demands that they follow by BT's recent example and also start blocking the Newzbin2 piracy website.

The wholly unsurprising move follows a recent ruling in London's High Court (here), which ordered (injunction) BT to impose an identical restriction upon the same site. The block itself finally began to take effect last week, despite BT's customers being easily and anonymously able to circumvent their Cleanfeed based internet filtering system (some did it just by typing the sites IP address).

According to ZDNet, the MPA's letter revealed that it plans to seek a court order against both providers (much as they did before with BT) and asked whether or not the ISPs would contest this.

A Virgin Media Spokeswoman said:

"As a responsible ISP, we will comply with any court order addressed to us but strongly believe such deterrents need to be accompanied by compelling legal alternatives, such as our agreement with Spotify, which give consumers access to content at the right price."

Nobody would be surprised if Sky Broadband (BSkyB), Orange and O2 ( Be Broadband ) ended up receiving a similar letter in the not too distant future (assuming they haven't already). However, both Orange and O2 are significantly smaller, while Sky has also been an outspoken supporter of Rights Holders.

So far both TalkTalk and Virgin Media have said that they would require a court order before any block could be imposed, although both appear to have the technological ability to do as the MPA desires. Meanwhile the MPA itself claims to be focusing upon only "the most harmful sites". The fact that such placebo skin deep blocking doesn't actually work frequently appears to be ignored.

UPDATE 10th November 2011

As expected, Sky confirms that it has also received a copy of the letter and will similarly require a court order. It remains unclear whether any of the ISPs will contest the order (fight it in court) or simply agree to it.

Some might wish to simply agree to the order because they already have the necessary technology in place, although this runs the risk of setting a precedent for the future when more borderline sites might be brought forward as part of similar requests.

UPDATE 2

The Open Rights Group (ORG) has finally caught up and issued their opinion.

Peter Bradwell of Open Rights Group said:

"We are concerned the Newzbin2 judgement is being used to whittle down a proper judicial process. We're at risk of stumbling into a haphazard and sloppy process for deciding what people are allowed to look at on the Internet. That undermines the Government's recent clear commitment to online freedom of expression. All this for a pointless exercise that won't do anything for the fortunes of the creative industries."

Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 4

asa logodragoneast
Posted: 9 November, 2011 - 9:36 AM
Link to comment

I suspect like much legal action these days, its a PR campaign to scare off the uninitiated rather than stop the determined (hence "keep it in the news"). It puts judges in a quandary: upholding the law whilst making it look an ass when it comes to enforcement. The Supreme Court will have to deal with this, but I bet they'll avoid it for as long as possible, hoping parliament or the EU rides to the rescue!
asa logoAdam
Posted: 9 November, 2011 - 8:33 PM
Link to comment

"However, both Orange and O2 are significantly smaller, and Sky doesn't have a Cleanfeed equivalent (most ISPs don't)."

Yes they do. Sky filter based on the IWF list like most of the big ISPs:

http://www.iwf.org.uk/services/blocking/iwf-list-recipients

I think all of those ISPs who implement the IWF filter are likely to be getting a nasty letter from the MPA sometime soon, as they already have the filtering systems in place and it would be easy for them to implement a court order to block a website.
asa logotimeless
Posted: 9 November, 2011 - 10:07 PM
Link to comment

problem is companies like the MPA dont care for anything but keeping out dated business models purely because they are lucrative.. plus physical media cant be transferred digitally.. however lm sure they would make allot more money if it was.
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 10 November, 2011 - 12:10 AM
Link to comment

The IWF is not there for piracy unless the government expand its remit. An IWF block list should not be blocking pirate material either, despite what some ISPs would like you to believe.
http://www.iwf.org.uk/about-iwf
Thats what the IWF is.



Generated in 0.60747 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).