By: MarkJ - 18 January, 2012 (9:07 AM) - Score: 2256 - Security
ipv6Facebook, Google, Microsoft Bing, Yahoo and many more websites from around the world have all agreed to make 6th June 2012 their official World IPv6 Launch day. This is the day when all associated websites will enable the "new" Internet Protocol v6 ( IPv6 ) addressing standard on their servers (similar to last year's 24-hour "test flight" but this time it will be permanent).

An IP address is assigned to your computer each time you go online (the internet equivalent of a phone number), which allows you to connect with other online websites and services. At present most of these use the old IPv4 (e.g. 84.76.41.2) standard, which are about to run out, and thus the adoption of IPv6 is fast becoming necessary.

Erik Kline, Google Tokyo's IPv6-Software Engineer, said:

"The original IPv6 specification was published more than 15 years ago, but for the entire career of most Internet engineers its deployment has always been in the future. Now it’s finally here. The widespread deployment of IPv6 paves the way for connecting together the billions of devices that permeate our livesーboth fixed and mobile, from the largest cloud computing services to the smallest sensors.

Just a year ago, we announced our participation in World IPv6 Day. Since then, the IPv4 address global free pool was officially depleted, each of the five regions around the world receiving one last address block. Soon after, the Asia-Pacific region exhausted its free IPv4 address pool. Hundreds of websites around the world turned on IPv6 for a 24-hour test flight last June. This time, IPv6 will stay on.

For Google, World IPv6 Launch means that virtually all our services, including Search, Gmail, YouTube and many more, will be available to the world over IPv6 permanently."

Thankfully ISP customers need not worry too much and you can even test your internet connection compatibility here ipv6test.google.com. Crucially most broadband providers in the UK shouldn't have any trouble (even if they lack IPv6 support) because IPv4 is still, for now, being catered for.

Google admits that it could still take "years for the Internet to transition fully to IPv6", which is in large part due to the slow pace of progress by large ISPs and hardware manufacturers (e.g. broadband routers).

Thankfully hardware makers like Billion and Technicolor have already begun producing IPv6-ready kit, some of which is beginning to enter the realm of consumer affordability. Cisco and D-Link have now also committed to enabling IPv6 across their range of home products by June 2012.

Meanwhile most of the largest ISPs have a significant stockpile of IPv4 addresses that should last them for several years before IPv6 becomes critical, although there is a risk that, during this time, some sites and services might become unreachable to IPv4-only connections.

ISPs that don't have plenty of spare IPv4 capacity also run the risk of being unable to connect new customers, at least not without resorting to problematic IP address sharing. One key problem is that many such ISPs still claim a lack of demand.

BT's Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk in February 2011:

"We foresee a predictable steady demand rather than a rush. Current predictions are for IPv4 addresses to run out circa 2012. After that we'll see a steady growth in usage of IPv6. At worse it will match the current usage trends of IPv4 growth. We believe that it will start lower than that as ISPs like BT use "carrier grade Network Address Translation" to delay the need to use IPv6.

BT's 21cn equipment is IPv6 ready. We just need to turn it on when the time is right; that is when there is clear customer demand and it is commercially viable. We have also run several IPv6 trials on several of our networks for extended periods."

The issue of "customer demand" often crops up but is a poor argument because IPv6 is a necessity not a feature. It's a seamless part of the internet, one that customers never have to see or know and thus one that would not be demanded.

Like it or not most ISPs will, for the next few years at least, need to at some point adopt a dual stack system that allows IPv6 and IPv4 networks to run side by side (note: they aren't "directly" compatible with each other). Sadly this is a costly solution and eventually native IPv6 connectivity will become the norm for all of us.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 10

asa logowirelesspacman
Posted: 18 January, 2012 - 11:28 AM
Link to comment

Why the geek-muppets who dreamt up IPv6 could not have made it more backwards compatible really is beyond me. They seem to have taken a very early decision that everyone must change everything and have stuck to that regardless. I would have thought it would have been so simple to set aside a tiny tiny bit of IPv6 address space (eg with a common predefined initial set of bits that indicates an IPv4 IP address follows) to simplify connectivity between the two address spaces. eg if your IPv4 address is 178.154.34.26 then your auto IPv6 address is 000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.178.154.34.26 or whatever.

The fact that they created something (deliberatly?) incompatible makes it not surprising that there is very slow take up.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 18 January, 2012 - 11:38 AM
Link to comment

If you have the time then it's worth reading the history of how that decision was made as it's a lot more complicated than might first appear. Suffice to say that there was no simple solution and the method chosen is, despite how it might appear on the surface, actually not all that bad compared to some of the other choices.

IPv6 is also designed to do more than IPv4 and fix some old problems, such as with NAT. It needed to be more than a direct replacement. Ultimately any IPv4 upgrade was always going to run into similar problems, you can't just add extra numbers, or something like that, and expect it to work.
asa logoKaren
Posted: 18 January, 2012 - 12:25 PM
Link to comment

I have yet to see any comments from UK ISPs about this. So far AAISP, Easynet, Claranet are already IPv6 enabled. However what about the bigger ISPs such as BT, Virgin etc. Are they going to launch by June 2012?

Perhaps a quote or two from some big ISPs about their plans would make a great article.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 18 January, 2012 - 1:41 PM
Link to comment

We've actually done lots of comment pieces in the recent past with ISPs. Here are a few related pieces that answer some of your question.

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/02/03/uk-isps-respond-to-ipv4-internet-address-depletion-and-ipv6-readiness-
concerns.html

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/02/04/virgin-media-business-uk-shuns-concern-over-ipv4-internet-apocalypse.h
tml

http://www.ispreview.co.uk/story/2011/06/08/uk-isp-fluidata-hails-world-ipv6-day-and-points-toward-the-benefits-of
-adoption.html
asa logoKaren
Posted: 18 January, 2012 - 4:14 PM
Link to comment

MarkJ

I know you have in the past - back when depletion occured and also on the run up to world IPv6 day last year.

Sorry, what I meant was there seems to be nothing from ISPs in 2012 about what their plans are to get the UK moving.

In India the government stipulated last year that all government and public authorities must use IPv6 from March 2012. Most ISPs there have already IPv6 because of this. Yet the UK is so far behind and no word when they might move forward.
asa logoboggits
Posted: 19 January, 2012 - 8:18 AM
Link to comment

Certain parts of the Industry have lobbied government to add IPv6 support to procurement contracts for the last 10 years - there are a lot who knew that there needed to be a carrot for those adopting IPv6 as well as the stick of run out - but the concept of adding a single paragraph to a document seems to be too 'difficult'.
asa logoboggits
Posted: 19 January, 2012 - 8:20 AM
Link to comment

we (the ISP community) even went as far to get RIPE to publish a document that could be referenced in tenders ( http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-501 ) to make it easier
asa logobd
Posted: 19 January, 2012 - 2:47 PM
Link to comment

@wirelesspacman you mean something like say - take your ip address 178.154.34.26 and write it in hex b2.9a.22.1a then append it to 2002. Your ipv6 address is 2002:b29a:221a::/48. Look up 6to4.

Virgin Media to support IPv6 end of 2012 - http://community.virginmedia.com/t5/Fibre-optic-broadband-cable/IPv6-support-on-Virgin-media/td-p/35748/page/7
asa logoJason5
Posted: 20 January, 2012 - 7:50 PM
Link to comment

Its not as easy as flicking a switch. A lot of the kit in use within the ISP cores (Cisco) enjoy many many features/services for ipv4 as it has been around (obviously) for many years, some of these features have yet to be enabled for ipv6 so its not just laziness on ISP's behalf's some features they rely on are not available yet under ipv6
asa logoJackson
Posted: 23 January, 2012 - 2:12 AM
Link to comment

New_Londoner and his Multi aliases are like cancer



Generated in 0.62759 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).