By: MarkJ - 6 February, 2012 (7:51 AM) - Score: 3748 - Fixed Line Broadband, Ofcom Regulation
bt openreach logoofcomThe communications regulator, Ofcom UK, has notified the European Commission (EC) of its intention to impose a new round of price cuts ("charge controls") upon BTOpenreach's (BT's wholesale access division) telephone and broadband lines. This includes both BT's own Wholesale Line Rental (WLR) services and rival Local Loop Unbundling ( LLU ) lines, such as those provided by Sky Broadband , TalkTalk and Be Broadband .

Under the revised European Framework, which was added into UK law during May 2011, Ofcom is required to submit charge control proposals to the European Commission (EC) for their review. Prior to this Ofcom would have consulted with UK stakeholders and the EU at the same time. Instead the regulator is now required to consult the EU after having undertaken a UK consultation.
Ofcom's Proposed Line Rental Charge Control Changes

* A fully unbundled line to a property - where a communications provider takes over the line to provide broadband and telephone services.

The price currently charged by Openreach is £91.50. Under Ofcom’s draft decision this will be set to £87.41 for financial year 2012/13 and decrease further in the next year in accordance with the formula RPI -5.9%.

* A shared unbundled line to a property - where a communications provider uses a proportion of the line only for the provision of broadband.

The wholesale price today is £14.70 per year. Under Ofcom’s draft decision this will be set to £11.92 for financial year 2012/13 and decrease further in the next year in accordance with the formula RPI -15.9%.

* Wholesale line rental - used by communications providers to offer telephone services to consumers using lines rented from Openreach.

The price today is £103.68 per year. Under Ofcom’s draft decision this will be set to £98.81 for financial year 2012/13 and decrease further in the next year in accordance with the formula RPI -7.3%.
Ofcom explains that in 2010 BT undertook a review of the valuation of its duct network, which resulted in the value of its duct network being "significantly increased". The regulator said that this did "not represent a reliable estimate" and instead decided to estimate the value of their post August 1997 duct through an RPI indexation of BT duct expenditure since August 1997. A final decision is due in early March 2012.

Overall the changes do not represent a significant reduction in price and thus most of the reductions are unlikely to be passed onto consumers, although some ISPs might attempt to do so. Meanwhile BT looks set to oppose the change and has said that they, "disagree with some of the underlying assumptions that [Ofcom] have used to determine these charge controls".
Ofcom's Feb 2012 Charge Control Review (LLU and WLR Services)
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/llu-wlr-further-consultation/statement
UPDATE 8th February 2012

Added a small statement from BT at the bottom. It should also be noted that Ofcom's first proposed prices have a habit of changing before they come into effect.
Share: Slash., Stumble, Facebook, Digg, Blink, Reddit, Delicious, Diigo
Option: Link | Search

Comments: 9

asa logoBob
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 12:56 PM
Link to comment

The pressure for this is coming from the EU who are concerned about the lack of competition in the UK market
asa logoSledgehammer
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 1:47 PM
Link to comment

QUOTE Overall the changes do not represent a significant reduction in price and thus most of the reductions are unlikely to be passed onto consumers, although some ISPs might attempt to do so.

WHY?

Any drop in price of any service should be passed on to the consumer. NOT held on to by the ISP.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 1:52 PM
Link to comment

A fine principal and one I'd agree with, although in a commercial market the ISP can ultimately do as it pleases. Also remember that some ISPs have absorbed past price rises, thus there is a balancing act to perform with eveything.
asa logoSledgehammer
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 3:26 PM
Link to comment

@MarkJ

It smacks of a rip off/pay back. Why Oh why can't we have a straight forward system. it seems everything connected with payment to any commercial concern is always riddled with this sort of action and attitude.

Another case of lets rip the DOZY B*ggers off again.
asa logoMarkJ
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 4:17 PM
Link to comment

Indeed, although let's not forget that the UK is home to some of the cheapest consumer broadband services in the world, which is a result of that same aggressive commercial competition.
asa logoMike
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 4:50 PM
Link to comment

Its also home of some of the slowest broadband, most capped and oldest infrastructure. This is great news anything that nibbles away at any monopoly and encourages further competition is a good thing.
asa logosam
Posted: 6 February, 2012 - 9:06 PM
Link to comment

nice, every little helps.
asa logoDeduction
Posted: 7 February, 2012 - 1:24 AM
Link to comment

Anything that means less money in the BT cash cow pocket the better as far as im concerned.
asa logoMiniee
Posted: 20 February, 2012 - 2:32 AM
Link to comment

As I untarsdend it, Ofcom are willing to contemplate higher regulated rates of return for fibre than for copper. They also are cognisant of the need to give regulatory certainty over a longer than normal period of time for fibre as it has a longer life than legacy copper. That doesn't translate into a holiday a la German VDSL



Generated in 0.63407 seconds.
DB queries: 8

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy Policy, Links (.), Live Chat & Website Rules).