Complaint letter about ISP review.

[Darkspark]

I am writing to express my concerns about ISP Review and, more specifically, its beliefs regarding what I call untrustworthy chiselers. But first, let me pose you a question: Is ISP Review actually concerned about any of us, or does it just want to present a false image to the world by hiding unpleasant but vitally important realities about its hariolations? After reading this letter, you'll truly find it's the latter. ISP Review's philippics are fatally fissiparous. Surprisingly, the courts and our elected officials are way ahead of ISP Review in embracing this simple fact. Illogical and raving, ISP Review's equivocations resemble a dilapidated shed. Kick in the door and the whole rotten structure will collapse, proving my claim that I have often maintained that reasonable people can reasonably disagree. Unfortunately, when dealing with ISP Review and its intimates, that claim assumes facts not in evidence. So let me claim instead that we must draw the line somewhere. ISP Review may mean well but it acts as if it were King of the World. This hauteur is astonishing, staggering, and mind-boggling. One of the goals of militarism is to render meaningless the words "best" and "worst". ISP Review admires that philosophy because, by annihilating human perceptions of quality, ISP Review's own mediocrity can flourish.

ISP Review should not be allowed to operate heavy machinery, specifically, its ego. This is not rhetoric. This is reality.

Here's an eye-opener for you: ISP Review doesn't want us to get it off our backs. It would rather we settle for the meatless bone of hedonism. It seems clear that this is an exceptionally convincing illustration of the power wielded by ISP Review and of the destructive way in which it uses that power. But we ought to look at the matter in a broader framework before we draw final conclusions on the subject: We see that ISP Review can't possibly believe that it has the mandate of Heaven to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination. It's moonstruck, but it's not that moonstruck. In a recent essay, ISP Review stated that university professors must conform their theses and conclusions to its fastidious prejudices if they want to publish papers and advance their careers. Since the arguments it made in the rest of its essay are based in part on that assumption, it should be aware that it just isn't true. Not only that, but if it gets its way, we will soon be engulfed in a Dark Age of paternalism and indescribable horror. That's why I'm telling you that ISP Review writes a lot of long statements that mean practically nothing. What's sneaky is that it constructs those statements in such a way that it never occurs to its readers to analyze them. Analysis would almost certainly indicate that if ISP Review makes fun of me or insults me, I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to expose the connections between the unrealistic problems that face us and the key issues of Dadaism and corporatism. That's it for this letter. I sincerely hope that typing it was not a complete waste of energy. Unfortunately, I do realize that my words will probably trigger no useful response in the flabby synapses of ISP Review's brain. I just felt obligated to go through the motions because except for a few bright spots, ISP Review's conjectures are entirely spineless.

In conjunction with that it is imperative that I give you the following information, which ISP Review wants concealed from the public. Before I start, however, I should state that to understand what ISP Review's particularly sententious form of communism has encompassed as a movement and as a system of rule, we have to look at its historical context and development as a form of manipulative politics that first arose in early twentieth-century Europe in response to rapid social upheaval, the devastation of World War I, and the Bolshevik Revolution. If a modern Dante were to update the Divine Comedy, he would have to create a special circle in Hell for unimaginative jokers who play the blame game. The reason is clear. ISP Review says that it is as innocent as a newborn lamb. What it means by this, of course, is that it wants free reign to send children to die as martyrs for causes that it is unwilling to die for itself.

Now, more than ever, we must see through the haze of lexiphanicism. If ISP Review got its way, it'd be able to open the gates of Hell. Brrrr! It sends chills down my spine just thinking about that. Because of ISP Review's eagerness to participate in riots, I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while ISP Review still has the ability to twist the teaching of history to suit its namby-pamby purposes. Behold what a nice, thick, fat lie it is when ISP Review denies ever having strived to fan the flames of solipsism into a planet-spanning inferno.

Here, too, we can see how ISP Review is stepping over the line when it attempts to usher in the rule of the Antichrist and the apocalyptic end times -- way over the line. I don't know whether or not you've ever been physically present at a public demonstration by ISP Review's hirelings, but let me tell you, they're pretty acrimonious. Even by ISP Review's own account, its eccentricity is surpassed only by its vanity. And ISP Review's vanity is surpassed only by its empty theorizing. (Remember its theory that immoralism brings one closer to nirvana?) You should never forget the three most important facets of ISP Review's propositions, namely their ill-bred origins, their internal contradictions, and their tendentious nature. In order to understand the motivation behind ISP Review's shenanigans, it is important first to take stock of what we know, identify areas for further research, and provide a useful starting point for debate on ISP Review's sinister diatribes. There is a vast empirical literature on this subject. Never forget that and never let ISP Review exhibit cruelty to animals.

[chrislane]

???

[butler]

Thyis has me wondering what was replaced with ispreview before the cut and paste??

Any suggestions?

[rruwalton]

Has LSD been legalised?

[Cre@tive]

Darkspark thats makes no sense at all

[Old dude]

Could someone sum that up in one short paragraph for me please? I got halfway through and gave up.

[bignige]

This must be a wind up !!!!

[Kits]

well I am lost for words and personally feel numb by this. I have worked helping members with problems as far as I can pased emails over PMs to see if they can get further help.



Darkspark I do not know what you are going on about so perhaps a more specific post explaining your complaint?

I have not edited posts and the only thread I have closed for months was one attacking another member

You can add me to your MSN if you wish to talk to me personally Darkspark

[Mel]

That reads like something that was translated by google!

[Unicast]

Some big words in there!

Has George Galloway hacked Darkspark's account?