kansenji
0
Norton is no longer a resource hog.
That's strange, I've used Norton Internet Security 2008 & 2009 for two years, without a single glitch. NIS 2009 uses very little resources (there is a resource meter supplied in the programme). You must have had a messed up installation, or other conflict on your PC.
I've had 13 years' experience of many different antiviruses/security suites (I've tried just about all of them) and the latest Norton Internet Security software is by far the best such software available at the moment. Whereas, from the 2004 to the 2007 versions, it was AWFUL!:shrug:
Most similar softwares seem to suffer from failed installations from time to time, leading to such "rubbish" remarks. I found Bit-Defender to install so badly on my PC, that I got a "blue screen of death" twice, immediately after installation and had to do a complete re-format & re-install of Windows EACH time! Yet most people seem to have no such problem with it.
They are rubbish, frankly.
Just had to sort out yet more problems caused by 2008!
That's strange, I've used Norton Internet Security 2008 & 2009 for two years, without a single glitch. NIS 2009 uses very little resources (there is a resource meter supplied in the programme). You must have had a messed up installation, or other conflict on your PC.
I've had 13 years' experience of many different antiviruses/security suites (I've tried just about all of them) and the latest Norton Internet Security software is by far the best such software available at the moment. Whereas, from the 2004 to the 2007 versions, it was AWFUL!:shrug:
Most similar softwares seem to suffer from failed installations from time to time, leading to such "rubbish" remarks. I found Bit-Defender to install so badly on my PC, that I got a "blue screen of death" twice, immediately after installation and had to do a complete re-format & re-install of Windows EACH time! Yet most people seem to have no such problem with it.