» ISP News » 

O2 UK Accused of Political Censorship by Male Human Rights Websites

Tuesday, May 28th, 2013 (2:20 am) - Score 2,160
censorship online

Mobile operator O2 UK has been accused of unfair “sexism and political censorship” after its mobile broadband platform was found to still be blocking over 100 websites that promote equality for men and or which have dedicated themselves to helping male victims of domestic violence and rape.

Admittedly some of the anti-feminist style websites are controversial and might perhaps have no trouble straying over some people’s perception of a red line (site list), which could make a tiny portion of them compatible with O2’s definition of a “hate site” (you can check if a website is blocked on O2 here – http://urlchecker.o2.co.uk/).

But many others are far from deserving of such a classification and could raise questions about the risks from abuse by overzealous internet filtering systems that impose restrictions without a proper review. Not that any of these concerns are new to O2, which is no stranger to such controversy (here).

John Kimble, Male Human Rights Activist, told ISPreview.co.uk:

My research on this matter and the response I’ve had from O2 suggests they’ve confused feminism with females as a whole, and thus they mistakenly regard any criticism of feminism (a political ideology) as criticism of women. No other ideology gets the same immunity from criticism that O2 give feminism and the likes of capitalism, socialism, communism etc. are all (quite rightly) fair game for critique.

It’s also worth noting that highly contentious feminist sites are not blocked, for example http://femitheist******.blogspot.com promotes castration of all males. Even mainstream and popular feminist sites such as Jezebel.com are at least as controversial as any on the list.”

O2 counters that all mobile operators in the United Kingdom are “using the same approach” and they claim that this is supported by the Independent Mobile Classification Body (IMCB). “The sites listed within the links you’ve sent over have been correctly categorised by us following the IMCB classifications,” said a spokesperson for O2.

Furthermore O2 notes that it is still possible to remove the block but this requires a credit card (not every adult has one of those) and disables all of the censorship measures through an age verification system (https://ageverification.o2.co.uk). A second option also exists that asks the customer to take a photographic ID into one of O2’s store, which could cause some embarrassment.

An O2 Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:

We respect our customers’ freedom to choose the material that they access. But at the same time, we want to protect young people from seeing things they shouldn’t. So our approach is to protect our younger customers and apply a default block that restricts access to adult content, but that can easily be removed by customers who are over the age of 18.”

It’s sometimes been suggested that if we applied the same censorship logic as O2 and IMCB in the real-world then anybody under the age of 18 might never be allowed to leave the home. After all, “adult” themes pervade almost every facet of modern life.

High street shops display posters or mannequins of men and women in their underwear, violence on TV soaps (even in some cartoons), swearing in public places, spitting on the street, people smoking and drinking alcohol are just a few of the many adult themes that our children can be exposed to on an often daily basis. Not to mention problems that can occur in the home itself.

Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Right Group, added:

ORG has catalogued this problem for over 18 months. This is a deliberate decision by mobile companies, who are judging that such sites pose a danger to people under 18. Unlike pornographic sites, children over 16 have a right to access sites offering opinions and comment that are sometimes extreme but never illegal. These young people will shortly have to vote. Mobile companies are in dangerous territory when they restrict material on political grounds to people who are legally able to get a job, live on their own, get married and have children.

Of course many adults will also find it highly inconvenient to switch filtering off, as it can require going into a shop with photo ID, or entering credit card details into a tiny phone screen. What this incident shows is that default filtering options will never work without harming website publishers and young adults. Customers really need to be asked before filtering is imposed.”

Ultimately education is a far better weapon than the blunt approach of broad censorship. It’s one thing to block hard-core porn and extreme violence from the gaze of young eyes, even though those same eyes probably know how to circumvent such restrictions, but censoring anything even remotely “adult” in nature may be pushing the boat out too far.

Sadly websites currently have no support mechanisms, other than through an expensive court process, with which to challenge potentially unlawful censorship of internet content. Conversely it seems to have become increasingly easy for copyright holders and other organisations to block sites that they take a dislike too.

In an ideal world mobile companies wouldn’t switch on filtering by default but could instead think about asking their customers first. The only problem with this is that personal payg mobile phones are more accessible to children than fixed line internet subscriptions.

Leave a Comment
8 Responses
  1. Avatar Gareth

    You don’t need a credit card or photo ID. Just use your feet and move to an ISP that isn’t “thick”.

  2. Hi, Just to clarify that I don’t represent Avoiceformen in any capacity, I simply wrote an article for them.

  3. Avatar DB

    This is absolutely disgusting. How can they justify banning websites that help men deal with suicidal thoughts? And who okayed the banning of these sites?

  4. Avatar Gary

    And this is a good example of why it “Will be like trying to nail water to a tree” to quote the article here; http://www.wolfsoftware.com/blog/big-uk-isps-all-plan-network-level-adult-website-filtering/

  5. Avatar ZimbaZumba

    For heavens sakes O2. Western Democracies have been dealing with Censorship and how to deal with it for years. The lessons learned are that you censor only speech under the most extreme and truly awful circumstances; else your world goes mad very quickly. What makes this absurdly worse and even obscene is that the censorship here is of a political nature. Thin attempts are being made to suggest it is on “Hate Speech” criteria, many an authoritarian dictatorship would have been proud of that one. The hate speech laws in the UK are only invoked for the most profoundly awful, repeated, widespread and noxious speech. Legal scholars know to do otherwise leads to an entirely unworkable law. O2 is hitting the unworkability of this already, they are blocking mainstream sites and leaving some awful sites unblocked; neither of which I’d block.

    Public speech, especially through mass media, is one of the fundamental pillars of Democracy. It holds those in power to account and has taken 100’s of years to achieve. Censorship is the very antithesis of this. What O2 is doing is absurdly naive and reeks of Cold War East Europe. There is something very deeply wrong going on here and is at the fundamental level of our system. We don’t entirely know how Democracy works, but one thing we do know is that free speech is fundamental.

    This whole issue need to be addressed at a formal level through the Courts or by Government. I am assume O2 has some sort of telecommunications license. Kudo’s for ISPreview for publishing this article, my guess is O2 will now add you to their list.

  6. Avatar keith

    “An O2 Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:
    We respect our customers’ freedom to choose the material that they access. But at the same time, we want to protect young people from seeing things they shouldn’t. So our approach is to protect our younger customers and apply a default block that restricts access to adult content, but that can easily be removed by customers who are over the age of 18.”

    LMAO if they think that way half the internet should be blocked including any and all news sites we do not want little billy seeing people killed after all.

    The biggest irony though with regards to them protecting children……..
    QUOTE”In 2011 Eddie Izzard, the man who turned talking ‘Bollocks’ into an art form”

    No doubt the particular word in apostrophes which they not i used is acceptable and something children on the internet should see though. Every young child should learn what talking bollocks is and inform O2 and their parents when they are indeed talking in that fashion 😉

    Well done Telefonica/O2 for allowing such an child friendly event and wording on your own owned website.

    I can only assume the spokesperson in this news item for them equals = a clueless corporate bitch.

  7. Avatar dragoneast

    The devil makes work . . . in more ways than one.

    As money is short, and genuine innovation costs money, so work is created to give the jobsworths something to do by supposingly “regulating” everything in sight, and out of it for that matter. Perhaps fascism and its successors in the old Iron Curtain “communist” bloc won the battle for ideas after all? What did we fight two world wars for? Is the UK government so much different in its philosophy from the government of China: they increasingly sound the same.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £19.95 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Gift Card
  • SSE £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.95
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*35.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £70 Reward Card
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2653)
  2. FTTP (2460)
  3. FTTC (1722)
  4. Building Digital UK (1663)
  5. Politics (1542)
  6. Openreach (1512)
  7. Business (1326)
  8. FTTH (1234)
  9. Statistics (1155)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1128)
  11. Fibre Optic (1020)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (973)
  13. 4G (973)
  14. Wireless Internet (972)
  15. Virgin Media (935)
  16. EE (649)
  17. Sky Broadband (639)
  18. TalkTalk (618)
  19. Vodafone (601)
  20. 3G (438)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact