» ISP News » 

UPDATE UK Government Confirm Move to Force ISPs into Blocking “Adult” Sites

Monday, November 21st, 2016 (8:35 am) - Score 173,958

As expected the Government has officially announced that Mobile and fixed line broadband providers in the United Kingdom will soon be forced into the mandatory blocking of all “adult” websites; specifically those that fail to offer an adequate method of age-verification for their visitors.

The new approach, which was first hinted at last month after Claire Perry MP tabled several directly related amendments (here), will be officially introduced as part of a change to the forthcoming Digital Economy Bill 2016-17.

However the idea itself has been on the table since last year (here), which is partly because the Government need a solution to help stop the EU’s new Net Neutrality rules from effectively banning network-level blocking systems (here); these are used by ISPs to censor websites, both voluntarily or following a court-order.

At present all of the biggest fixed line broadband ISPs and Mobile operators have already adopted a voluntary approach to blocking adult sites (Parental Controls), which gives new and existing subscribers a choice about whether or not to enable such censorship on their connection. But even the toughest of these systems will still provide account owners with the option to disable such blocks, yet this flexibility may soon be removed.

Under the new approach the British Board of Film Classification (BBFC) will be given powers to make Internet Service Providers (ISP) restrict access to pornographic sites that fail to put “tough age verification measures” in place to protect children.

Karen Bradley, Secretary of State for Culture, Media and Sport, said:

“The Government is committed to keeping children safe from harmful pornographic content online and that is exactly what we are doing.

Only adults should be allowed to view such content and we have appointed a regulator, BBFC, to make sure the right age checks are in place to make that happen. If sites refuse to comply, they should be blocked.”

Apparently the requirement to block such “rogue sites” would apply to all websites in the United Kingdom and overseas. Where websites originate in the EU the process will be “compatible with country of origin rules“, which is interesting because some EU states are a lot less puritanical than the UK has recently become.

In terms of pornographic websites, the Government claims that the top 50 sites account for 70% of users and “many“, including the largest free site by market share, have already agreed with the government to implement age verification. The bill also introduces a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites.

As ever there are plenty of concerns with the new approach, not least the question of how you actually make ‘Age Verification‘ work without forcing people to share their private personal and or financial details with unreliable porn peddlers, and possibly the Government too. The infamous Ashley Madison hack showed just how dangerous such information can be in the wrong hands (following in its wake were multiple cases of blackmail and suicide etc.).

Naturally the Government focuses all of its energy on the word “pornographic“, while the legislation itself tends to prefer the much less specific “adult content” (i.e. open to interpretation and mission creep). We’ve seen in the past how dating websites, as well as sites that support victims of self-harm, social networks, sites that express different political views and medical sites can often end up being blocked because they are deemed to contain “adult content“.

Jim Killock, Executive Director of the Open Rights Group, said:

“This could lead to tens of thousands of websites being blocked, despite their content being perfectly legal.

In no way should this proposal be legislated for in this bill. There has been no thought or consultation, and the government has not even begun to define how blocking might be attempted.

They have no idea if it would work well or badly, or whether there is serious enough harm to justify such a massive restriction on UK adults access to legal material.

We do however know that over 90% of parents manage their children’s activities online, according to OFCOM, and that 70% of households do not have children.”

The cost of implementing such a system isn’t such an issue for the bigger ISPs, but smaller providers could struggle (network-level filtering isn’t a cheap or easy thing to implement). A number of providers may be able to get around this because they already require customers to be over the age of 18, although this will depend upon how the final legislation is worded.

On top of that there will be questions about what happens if a website is wrongfully blocked. Plus we must not forget that most adults, usually those without children, don’t want to censor legal adult websites (here) and indeed a large proportion of adults do access porn online (here).

Finally, anybody who wants to find and access such material will easily be able to circumvent such blocks, such as via a proxy server or VPN. Lest we not forget Google’s image search, which displays naughty content unless ‘Safe Search‘ is enabled (will Google be blocked too?). All of these circumvention methods are easy to use and you can bet the last pound in your pocket that children above a certain age will know more about this than the rest of us.

UPDATE 24th Nov 2016

The proposed amendment to support the above change has now been tabled for the Digital Economy Bill (here).

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
48 Responses
  1. Avatar dragoneast says:

    “Taking back control”. We asked for it.

    1. Avatar Tolq says:

      More like “Assuming direct control”…

    2. Avatar dragoneast says:

      Same thing to a politician isn’t it?

    3. Avatar Yassica says:

      Protecting new brains from porn is a must http://helpmebro.com/posts/2ARiNvdy1N

    4. Avatar Paulm50 says:

      Google, what is a VPN. I’m sure someone at the BBFC and Westminster has told them what they do. But when you need to create work to look important, who cares about if it works.

    5. Avatar Bob2002 says:

      Was the proposed Interception Modernisation Programme under Labour in 2008 – taking back control?


      British mainstream political parties feel the need to keep an eye on the populace, just to be on the safe side.

    6. Avatar Bob says:

      You don’t even need a VPN. The blocking they are using is a simple DNS hijack which re-directs your connection. Just use something like DNS crypt and they can no longer intercept it.

    7. Avatar Anonymous says:

      Protecting new brains with porn is a must http://hidemebro.com
      the new law only works on the assumption that nobody knows anything about technology at all…

  2. Avatar Optimist says:

    What next? Sites that satirise religions or politicians?

  3. Avatar Sledgehammer says:

    Smacks of idiots trying to make laws that could prove totally ineffective too anyone who knows how to evade such blocks.

  4. Avatar Chris says:

    Beach of basic human right?? Shame we don’t have the EU to temper the power of the power hungry !

    1. Avatar Chris says:

      Beach of human rights, sounds like a lovely place to go for a tan.

    2. Avatar chris says:

      we are still in the the EU and will be until 2019 and that if brexit does not fall apart and it seems it will

  5. Avatar Ethel Prunehat says:

    > Lest we not forget Google’s image search

    So are you saying that we /should/ forget Google image search?

    1. Avatar Paulm50 says:

      Image search porn and all the porn anyone could ask for is there. How do they plan to block Google, Twitter and every other free porn site there is? Without blocking every single site with anything that has a porn related word in it?

      Asking the BBFC to start checking what site needs banning and what site doesn’t it stupid it would take an army of people to even start. So it has to be done by algorithms that search for suspect words. Which means News Sites, including this one.

  6. Avatar Chris says:

    Oh no, what am I going to do on a wet autumn evening now?

    Yet another civil liberty breach, the UK really is becoming a big brother nation. This is non-proportional and the idea of giving my credit card details to such a site is laughable. Also, the cost to small ISPs will be very restrictive. Being in the last 5% I want to see nothing that will hinder my chances of accessing Internet above 3Mbs. Maybe that is already screwed by the snooping charter anyway. How can the government pretend it is serious about reaching the last 5% when it puts roadblocks like this in the way?

    And to top it all off it is pointless as people will use proxys and VPNs. I certainly use a VPN already. Will there be another exception clause for MPs like in the snooping charter?

    Grrr, makes me grumpy.

  7. Avatar DTMark says:

    I can think of one site we built and host for a customer which sells vaping products.

    It does have an “Are you over 18?” message that pops up. Getting past that is simply a matter of clicking the button labelled “Yes”.

    This is the sort of thing that I would imagine may be deemed to be “adult content”.

    Yet anyone can view with “self-verification” and pay using, say, a Visa Electron debit card which is available to under 18s.

    So the question is then: how do you “verify” the user?

    “we have appointed a regulator, BBFC, to make sure the right age checks are in place to make that happen”

    As Mark points out in the article: how?

    Is this going to make lots of money for providers like Experian who might be able to offer an API to actually check peoples’ ages?

    And if so, the customer may as well close their website. Nobody is going to fill in forms on entry to the site providing their full details before they even get to look at anything. They’ll just buy from a site (overseas) that does not have this requirement.

  8. Avatar Chess says:

    I forgot we were living in North Korea. Soon only a select few websites will be accessible and all just promoting government propaganda.

    1. Avatar chris says:

      Its highly unlikely they will be able to do that anytime soon

  9. Avatar captain.cretin says:

    Google wouldnt let me create a gmail account for my daughter because she is only 3; they had no problem when I changed the DOB to make her 116 years old.

    1. Avatar DTMark says:

      IIRC Google displays your day/month of birth or your year of birth on your public profile page.

      You can choose which one, but neither is a great idea from the perspective of identity theft.

      Therefore you should indeed give Google an incorrect date of birth. Which comes neatly back to the topic of this news item 🙂

  10. Avatar Data Analysis says:

    Ridiculous you probably wont even need a VPN or proxy.

    If an age verification system via credit card number check is put in place just to enter the site then i imagine the old trick of 4222222222222 and selecting Visa will get around that.

    Unless a separate bank system then checks each name and number of each visitor to the site. Thats Highly unlikely given the huge amount of visitors on some porn sites, even less likely if its a non-pay for site like most are.

    Government never learn sigh 🙁

  11. Avatar Bob2002 says:

    Anyone wondering why this site seems a bit sluggish … ISPreview has achieved a double-whammy on the reddit front page –


  12. Avatar Robert says:

    Why don’t parents just regulate their children’s internet usage? It’s not like kids can go out and buy a computer and pay for internet access. There are literally hundreds of options outside of governmental censorship.

    1. Avatar timeless says:

      because most parents are lazy and treat the net like daycare.

    2. Avatar Ricky says:

      “We do however know that over 90% of parents manage their children’s activities online, according to OFCOM, and that 70% of households do not have children.”

  13. Avatar Peter Rushkin says:

    First they came for the Porn Sites, and I did not speak out—
    Because I didn’t watch Porn.

    Then they came for the Torrent Sites, and I did not speak out—
    Because I didn’t torrent.

    Then they came for the Bitcoin Sites, and I did not speak out—
    Because I didn’t pay with bitcoin.

    Then they came for me for using VPN and there was no one left to speak for me.

    1. Avatar hugh janus says:

      Sure there will be someone to speak for you – all those torrenters, and porn watchers and bitCoin users will all be on VPNs by that time (assuming they are not already).

      You know what is interesting though – the Investigatory Powers Act, leading to more people using VPNs, and now this. I wonder how many MPs have been buying shares in VPN companies recently…

    2. Avatar Eoin Flaherty says:

      The current blocking and tracking arrangements in the UK are DNS based. No need for VPN, just DNSSEC or DNSCRYPT to get around the transparent DNS proxy. They’re going to have to spend a shitload of money to achieve their stated aims.

    3. Avatar NH says:

      Yea if it’s even possible. The internet was built from the ground up to prevent this kind of control. There’s always way around it. Look how hard China have been trying and still people easily get round their firewall.

  14. Avatar Jack says:

    Makes me proud to be an American where at least I’m able to disperse some knuckle children without being forced to look at a blank wall

    1. Avatar Jonathan Marshall says:

      In the future Jack, when voicing your “opinion”,
      please don’t announce your US citizenship.
      It makes the rest of us seem like fools. Thanks.

  15. Avatar theone says:

    It’s so sad to see that poor country of yours collapsing under such an awful government, maybe people will eventually take a stand

    1. Avatar Jigsy says:

      >[…] maybe people will eventually take a stand […]

      As someone from the UK, you’re kidding, right? That would require the apathetic masses to tear themselves away from their bread and circuses for more than a second.

  16. Avatar Anthony Buck says:

    Please sign and share this petition:


    It reads:

    Do not censor the internet. Please rethink forcing ISPs to Block “Adult” Sites.

    As part of the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17 the government has officially announced that Mobile and fixed line broadband providers in the United Kingdom will be forced to block all “adult” websites. This is a slippery slope which can be used to force ever increasing censorship on undesirable views.

    The bill also introduces a new power that forces payment services (e.g. VISA, Mastercard) to withdraw support from non-compliant sites. The legislation uses the term “adult content” (i.e. open to interpretation and mission creep.) Dating, self-harm support, social networks, different political views and medical sites have historically been tagged as “adult content“. More at: http://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/11/uk-government-confirm-move-force-isps-blocking-adult-sites.html

    1. Avatar Billy says:

      We’re checking this petition

      5 people have already supported Anthony Buck’s petition.

      We need to check it meets the petition standards before we publish it.

      Please try again in a few days.

    2. Avatar sleepwalking-into-a-new-wol says:

      Oh the irony:

      Your connection is not private

      Attackers might be trying to steal your information from petition.parliament.uk (for example, passwords, messages or credit cards). NET::ERR_CERTIFICATE_TRANSPARENCY_REQUIRED

  17. Avatar Chris says:

    I’m reading through the bill currently & I’m really struggling to find the language that dictates sites will be blocked if they fail to comply. All I have been able to find so far is a financial penalty will be imposed of an amount of up to £250k.

  18. Avatar Greg says:

    Pretty rich for a government fresh from covering up vip paedo rings to presume to have any kind of moral authority, then awkwardly enough… treat everyone like children.

  19. Avatar timeless says:

    l wonder if ppl realise this is how censorship starts… once you have a system in place other things can be blocked too.. that coupled with the new snooping laws sets a pretty worrying trend.

  20. Avatar Covey says:

    So people will start using Tor to access their Porn, what a complete waste of peoples time and money.

  21. Avatar Daniel says:

    I must say that this is outrageous in my opinion. There are many things that a kid can see on TV that need to be blocked. We are step away from blocking everything that is not pleasant for some eyes. Really, its just a shame.

  22. Avatar Paul says:

    Big brother plain and simple

  23. Avatar James Blunt says:

    Remember how Mary Whitehouse’s actions resulted in the Whitehouse magazine?
    Someone ought to do the same for her protege Claire Perry.

  24. Avatar Christopher Wedge says:

    Tor? This is just a DNS filtering bill – not at all fit for it’s stated purpose. It’s not hard to use a different DNS service. It helps stop malicious JavaScript AND allows unfiltered (well, unfiltered by anyone other than you) access.

    If, however, the actual focus is on blocking those pesky political dissidents (feminists are really on the defensive after being forced by the public and some MPs to pay lip service to International Men’s Day) then it might see more success. Phone companies such as O2 have already done such things of their own volition. This is one of the reasons why it kind of wrankles me when people say “the government” as if that reveals much about the individuals involved. After all,an age where the public trusts a lyong media is an age where politicians have no choice but to follow the orders of said media.

  25. Avatar Jigsy says:

    Non-conventional porn (e.g. female ejaculation) will be banned in the UK along side sites that “fail the rating.”


  26. Avatar tedd says:

    If you are upto 18 or more and want to become the world richest porn star,
    you just came to the right blog.We at bangbros give you the opportunity
    to showcase your curves and your moves.
    The pay is attractive,and it will change your life.
    All you have to do is to send a mail to bangbrospornorecuirtment@gmail.com

  27. Avatar Elow Mate says:

    No of this nonsense will ever works. ISPs blocking is dinosaur compared to the current technology of the internet.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • NOW £22.00 (*32.00)
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.00 (*29.95)
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00 (*25.00)
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo Code: HYPERSPRING
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*36.52)
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Gigaclear £24.00 (*44.00)
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Offer Code: SPRUCE20
  • Vodafone £26.00 (*29.00)
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £28.00 (*44.00)
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £29.00 (*35.00)
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo Code: HYPERSPRING
  • TalkTalk £29.95 (*39.95)
    Speed: 145Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (3206)
  2. BT (2920)
  3. FTTC (1849)
  4. Building Digital UK (1848)
  5. Politics (1827)
  6. Openreach (1745)
  7. Business (1588)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1371)
  9. FTTH (1355)
  10. Statistics (1346)
  11. 4G (1181)
  12. Fibre Optic (1127)
  13. Wireless Internet (1107)
  14. Virgin Media (1101)
  15. Ofcom Regulation (1095)
  16. EE (785)
  17. Vodafone (777)
  18. TalkTalk (735)
  19. Sky Broadband (714)
  20. 5G (664)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact