Lit Fibre CEO Shares His Perspective on the UK’s Full Fibre Market
5. I think it goes without saying that Lit Fibre is a relatively new entrant in what has, over the past 3-4 years, become one of the most aggressively competitive markets for full fibre deployment in the whole of Europe.
More than 100 AltNets are currently playing in the same waters and quite a few of those, especially in towns and cities, are starting to overbuild each other. We suspect they won’t all survive and consolidation seems inevitable.
We note that Lit Fibre has already run into similar issues in some of its build areas and recently suspend a planned rollout in Frinton-on-Sea in order to “limit disruption to residents from multiple fibre operators already building networks in the town” (here).
Advertisement
How do you approach such tedious issues and what, in your view, gives Lit Fibre the edge in this kind of market?
ANSWER:
Firstly, we welcome competition in the market as it will ultimately benefit consumers and, with the rollout of full-fibre, will begin to repair some of the mistrust that consumers have in broadband companies.
I do not believe that alt-nets overbuilding each other makes rational sense. Our policy is to avoid that situation where possible by responding to what we see happening on the ground. We’ve built the flexibility in our systems and processes to be able to react quickly and make rational investment decisions.
6. We first heard about Lit Fibre in 2020, back then the operator was known by a different name – Broadreach Networks. This changed in January 2021 to the now familiar name. Why the change of name/brand?
ANSWER:
It’s simple really – Broadreach was a holding name whilst we were establishing the company and searching for our true identity. We wanted a name that told our customers what we did and Lit Fibre positions us very firmly as a Fibre company.
7. A growing topic in the market for altnet providers, particularly for IT people like myself, is the question of restrictions on consumer CPE (broadband routers etc.). Some ISPs are happy to sell their products in a way that enables end-users to, optionally, connect up a third-party router of their choice to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT) on the inside wall.
By comparison, some other ISPs have placed such aggressive restrictions on their routers that it can be hard to do even simple things, such as change the WiFi password of your home network, let alone anything more advanced like LAN IP assignments, port forwarding, WAN connectivity for third-party kit and so forth.
Advertisement
Where does Lit Fibre stand in this debate and how open is your network to third-party routers (either directly to the ONT or via WAN from your own CPE)?
ANSWER:
I believe that full fibre connectivity should empower freedom without compromising security. Our network is open to any third-party router connected to our ONT. We simply use DHCP, with no difficult PPoE settings or anything else, plug a laptop directly into our ONT and it will work straight away.
On our routers we do not lock any of the Wi-Fi SSID/passwords and allow our customers to provision their own SSIDs as needed, they have full control over the Wi-Fi settings.
We also offer a very powerful router bundled with our packages. We don’t feel the need to restrict our users to our own platform as we believe for the vast majority of users, we can offer them all they need and if we can’t then why should we stand in their way?
8. In recent years, the UK government has made and continues to make improvements to a number of crucial legislative areas, which have a direct impact upon fibre build. For example, there’s the development of a new code to support implementation of the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021, which will tackle “rogue landlords” that fail to respond or obstruct access.
Likewise, the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Bill (PSTI) includes various changes to the Electronic Communications Code (ECC), which aim to help accelerate gigabit broadband builds. Not to mention tweaks to the Access to Infrastructure (ATI) Regulations 2016 to aid the sharing of existing infrastructure, although the government didn’t go very far with that one.
On the flip side, England’s business rates holiday on new fibre has just ended, so it’s not all good news. What, in your view, has the government got right about all of these areas and what more would you like to see changed in order to help support, and even accelerate, Lit Fibre’s own future build?
Advertisement
ANSWER:
We welcome the steps the government are taking in these important areas to help facilitate the rollout of fibre. I experienced the challenges associated with wayleaves at Hyperoptic first-hand so some of these changes are long overdue and can only be helpful. I agree more could have been done to make the ATI regulations more practical in their first guise and improvements here are welcome. As with all these things, the proof of the pudding is in the eating, so I look forward to working with the rest of the industry to implement and test these improvements.
Whilst I would encourage a continuation of the holiday on business rates to encourage the urgently needed fibre upgrade for the UK which is underway, I accept that given the wider economic environment this is unlikely. It is important that there is equivalence across all operators and technologies (i.e. copper and fibre should pay the same amount per subscriber) given the revenue in terms of the retail price is very similar, and it doesn’t make sense to incentivise higher pricing on the investment in the FTTP network being built vs legacy network once they are both up and running.
9. Ofcom are currently considering new proposals from the Gigabit Take-Up Advisory Group (GigaTAG), which among other things called for the introduction of a new labelling systems to help consumers more easily identify the differences between “gigabit-ready” broadband networks and slower technologies.
Some operators want only true “full fibre” (FTTP) providers to have the right to use such terminology in their adverts, but that might conflict with gigabit-capable services via FTTB and DOCSIS 3.1 powered Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC) networks. Not to mention some multi-gigabit 5G capable deployments.
What sort of labelling system would you like to see?
ANSWER:
Labelling should be clear and reflect reality. Fibre to the home should mean that there is a fibre connection right into the premises.
However, I do not think the majority of consumers are concerned about the underlying technology. What consumers want is an accurate and consistent measurement of their speeds and support with an excellent in-home WIFI experience. In addition, reliability, value for money and excellent customer support, remain priorities for consumers.
In that respect, a more sophisticated labelling system that focuses on the customer experience, as well as the infrastructure, might be more useful for consumers to make an informed buying decision.
10. The Government’s £5bn Project Gigabit programme, which has adopted a mix of vouchers, gap funded deployments and some continuation of the Local Full Fibre Networks (LFFN) model, aims to extend 1Gbps capable broadband networks to reach at least 85% of UK premises by the end of 2025, and then “nationwide” by around 2030.
The funding released for this will depend upon how the industry responds. So far only £1.2bn has been released from the budget up until 2024, but more may be unlocked, provided the industry shows it can deliver. In terms of pros and cons, what are your thoughts on the new gigabit programme as it exists today and might we see Lit Fibre move to consider any rural builds as part of it?
ANSWER:
Lit’s primary focus is on commercially viable build with private funding. We are engaged with the Project Gigabit team and keep plans under review, but for now, we are concentrating on achieving our primary goal. It is still early days for us yet.
11. At present it’s difficult to escape all of the bad economic news that seems to pervade our daily lives, not least of which flows from the wider impacts of exceptionally high energy costs, shortages in the global supply change and the related surge in inflation.
Naturally, broadband operators are not immune to such problems. Can you tell us a bit about some of the related challenges Lit Fibre has faced in the last year and how you’ve adapted to those?
ANSWER:
We have taken steps to secure our supply chain and have faced a limited amount of inflation so far. We are confident in both our cost base and supply chain and for the foreseeable future, it is situation normal.
It’s this cost base that allows us to offer great pricing that will help consumers generate savings over their current provider, whilst getting a better service. In the current cost of living crisis, it will be reassuring to customers that we do not do in contract price hikes, so they can fix their prices by moving to Lit. What’s not to like?
12. One of the biggest developments this year has been Virgin Media O2’s decision to expand their FTTP (XGS-PON) broadband network to an additional 7 million premises via a new Joint Venture, which will also offer access to other ISPs at wholesale (with Virgin Media itself as an anchor tenant).
On top of that, VMO2’s existing gigabit-capable Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC) and FTTP RFoG broadband network – covering 15.6 million premises (including any Project Lightning expansion during 2022) – could optionally also be offered for rival ISPs to harness via wholesale (separate from the new joint venture).
All of this would establish VMO2 as a major competitor to Openreach, as well as other alternative networks, across over half of the UK if fully realised. What are your thoughts on this move and is it likely to affect your approach to the market or future deployments, if at all?
ANSWER:
VMO2’s decision to expand their network to an additional 7m premises is understandable given the competitive pressure on them in the market, but even with their significant resources, it is a tall order at this point. I think consolidation in the market is inevitable and that three, perhaps even four networks are commercially viable in urban areas.
13. Ofcom plans to implement a new One Touch Switch (OTS) migration system for UK broadband ISPs, which from April 2023 will make it easier for consumers to switch between ISPs on physically separate networks (i.e. extending the existing solution to include alternative networks, rather than just Openreach).
Broadly speaking, this new system, while adding new challenges for smaller providers, will still represent an important change that should help alternative networks to attract customers away from the biggest players. What are your thoughts on this, and are there any areas where you think Ofcom could have improved their approach?
ANSWER:
We support the aims of One Touch Switch (OTS) programme, anything that makes it stress-free for consumers to switch is a good thing. However, it is a complicated process to implement, and we are working alongside the OTA and the rest of the industry to make it happen before April 2023.
We’d just like to send a big ‘thank you’ to Tom for taking part in this interview and offering us some insight into Lit Fibre’s perspective on the sector.
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and Linkedin.
« ISP RunFibre Name 3 More Gloucestershire Villages for FTTP Rollout
Very interesting. All of a sudden we are getting all these alt networks popping up, which is good for competition, certainly if they knock a few customers from out of reach, but I do worry about their future. As was said in the article, fibre broadband costs a lot of money to get off the ground, they need to get a certain amount of customers just to pay back the loans and investments. If there is an open reach fibre in the same place, and someone is on say Talk Talk FTTP, which is on the open reach FTTC network, then they have the choice of going to the Alt network or stay with Talk Talk and moved onto openreach FTTP. Why would a person move to alt network if they had the choice of staying with the ISP they are already with on FTTP?
Sure, I know that once Zzoomm sort out their problems, their network is more advanced than openreach, but it would make little difference to the majority of people or me to be honest.
That will be the same for any Alt networks.
The other thing is, you go to an Alt network and then get into financial difficulties and is sold to another network, worse case being Talk Talk.
Competition is good, I like competition, but I fear there is not going to be enough customers to keep all these networks going.
“Sure, I know that once Zzoomm sort out their problems, their network is more advanced than openreach”
“The other thing is, you go to an Alt network and then get into financial difficulties and is sold to another network, worse case being Talk Talk.”
I’m not sure any PON provider could be described as more advanced than another, the only limit to the bandwidth is the Equipment you put at each end of the Fibre and you also have the ability to offer higher bandwith bespoke business connections, on different wavelengths, in tandem with standard GPON services.
It seems to me, many of the Altnet builders are building to sell the infrastructure once built. You constantly read the word consolidation in interviews such as this, suggesting much of the investment is a bet on selling the network to a bigger player down the road. Scale is important in Telecoms, and many of these Altnets will possibly struggle to cover ongoing operational costs in a truly competitive market. As far as consolidation is concerned, much will depend on integration and ongoing operational costs for any interested larger player, looking at buying the smaller Altnet, things like backhaul costs, compatability between network management systems, Engineering resource, etc, etc, will decide if a takeover is feasible. Many of the smaller, rural, geographically isolated Altnets may not attract a bigger player and simply go bust with the customers migrated onto Openreach.
@Ex Telecom Engineer: Your zeal for Openreach is admirable, but altnets do indeed often provide superior features. To name just a few important ones:
– symmetric fibre
– IPv6 support
– static IP address
– better customer support
– availability (Openreach simply won’t touch many small-town or rural areas)
IPv6, static IPs and customer service have nothing to do with Openreach so I’m not sure why you’ve listed them as differentiators. Obviously you can only subscribe to the service that is available to you, but Openreach as a result of being the largest network also have the largest rural coverage.
“@Ex Telecom Engineer: Your zeal for Openreach is admirable, but altnets do indeed often provide superior features. To name just a few important ones:”
I’m just pointing out that, in my opinion, Rural Altnets wont be able to compete on price, since scale gives the bigger players a competitive advantage. I disagree with everything you stated in your post:
“– symmetric fibre” Whether, or not, to supply a symetric service is purely down to provider choice. As I pointed out DWDM allows multiple services to share the same Fibre, so BT could provide a GPON service to a residential street, and also provide 100Gb symetric service to a business customer over the same fibre in the same location, as could any provider, should they choose to.
“– IPv6 support” IPV6 isn’t really necessary, since NAT has adequately allowed IPV4 addressing schemes for years, even since IPV6 was envisaged. According to Google IPV6 is available on BT, and has been in the majority of cases since 2016.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2016/11/bt-broadband-lines-now-support-ipv6-internet-addresses.html
https://www.m0lmk.co.uk/2021/12/11/bt-fttp-ubiquity-usg-ipv6/
“– static IP address” I think that one was answered in the IPV6 reply above.
“– better customer support” Openreach deal with the CP’s, not the residential customer. BT customer support has apparently improved dramatically in recent years.
According to Choose co uk
“BT customers are the most satisfied overall, with 88% saying they are satisfied with the service offered by their provider.”
I removed the link for the above quote, as this is my 2nd attempt to reply to GNewton, with my first attempt showing as moderated and then disappearing, I’ve removed the link in case that was the reason.
“– availability” Clearly that’s wrong.
“Otherwise, the operator’s main event continues to be their £15bn investment to deploy – via Openreach – a new full fibre broadband network to reach 25 million UK premises by December 2026. Some 6.2 million of those will be in rural or semi-rural areas.”
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2022/07/bt-results-see-full-fibre-grow-by-record-of-763000-uk-premises.html
GNewton you should be more specific, since everything you’ve stated is easily contradicted.
The comment on symmetry is the one legitimate criticism. CityFibre sell their wholesale customers symmetrical residential services. Most altnets sell symmetrical residential retail services. Openreach sell a ratio of at best 6:1 and at worst 8:1 on residential products.
Openreach’s customers can’t just light a wavelength on Openreach fibre they buy the products Openreach sell. Dark fibre to residential addresses at sane prices not being among those products.
Given Openreach continue to sell nothing but GPON as far as ‘broadband’ services go it’s reasonable to describe their FTTP network as less advanced than companies using XGSPON.
Everything else is obviously nothing to do with the network provider or is simply wrong.
Above on ratio should be at best 4:1. Apologies for typo.
@Ex Telecom Engineer, Zzoomm offers symmetric fibre, they can also do up to 2Gb/s if that is what people want, useful for business I suppose, but at nearly £100 a month out of reach for most people 🙂 Zzoomm uses XGS-PON, I have had a read about Pon and the differences, not being a network engineer there are some things I don’t understand, but I get the gist of it.
sure, fibre is fibre, it is the equipment connected to it that makes the difference, even I know that.
I mean fibre is fibre for what we are on about, I realise the fibre that I used to connect my Blueray player to my sound bar is a bit different, in quality.
so yes, Zzoomm networks knocks the spots of Openreach, but does anyone really care? the selling off is one of the things that bother me, Matthew Hare who is the founder and Chief Executive of Zzoomm used to own gigaclear and yet for some reason decided to sell that and set up another fibre network, so yes, that is a bit of a worry if I decided to go to Zzoomm.
To be honest, I hate Openreach, too big, too much influence and have had too much money from the taxpayers, also it is not possible to deal with them directly, and they belong to BT, which is a massive company again with far too much power. When I got off Openreach network a few years ago to go to a wireless network, I was so happy, I was so annoyed when it all went belly up and i had to come back onto the Openreach network.
That is the other reason why I am a bit bothered about going for fibre, certainly on a Alt network, because they may go belly up. Price is the thing as well, but to be honest, Zzoomm prices are not bad compared to others.
£33 a month for the 150Mb/s up and down, Talk Talk is £32 for 150 down, I have no idea what the up speed is.
If a Alt network does go belly up and none takes them over, all that fibre in the ground doing nothing.
Clearly the Altnet fanboy Force is strong on here. If you read my wording carefully and follow the links I provided, nothing I said was incorrect. Most users don’t require symmetric service, and Ad47uk it’s the terminal Equipments that determine Symmetric service not the Fibre. I used to work in DWDM Transmission, so I’m well aware of what’s possible in relation to utilising multiple Wavelengths; As I stated in my post, should BT wish to add a 100GB symmetric channel over the same Fibre as a current GPON service, it’s as simple as adding equipment, via splitters, at the exchange and customer site; As long as the equipment wavelengths don’t interfere with the GPON service and vice versa, both will work simultaneously. If BT don’t offer a particular service, it’s because they choose not to, probably because it isn’t needed by the majority of customers. Most potential FTTP residential customers aren’t interested in whether their connection is symmetric, or asymmetric, as long as they can do what they need to do, and GPON provides an adequate service for 99% of uk households; Businesses will probably be offered some sort of symmetric service, by BT if needed, probably with better SLA’s, levels of service, and a higher price point.
“@Ex Telecom Engineer it’s Sunday – go get laid dude – i am sure your underage boy can take it 8 times in a week.. saddo”
What’s that about angry man, is there something wrong with you? You should see a Psychiatrist urgently “dude”, you clearly have problems.
I was going to discuss some more but after that geniunely disgusting comment aimed at you I’ll leave it, Ex-telecom. Sorry you were on the receiving end of that.
@Ex Telecom Engineer, you may be right that most people don’t require symmetric service, but then do most people really need broadband 150Mb/s and over? I know families that have been using broadband of around the 37Mb./s area for years and don’t have any problems. Sure, their games may take a bit longer to download or that film they downloaded may take a bit longer, but they still get it in the end. If they get impatient then maybe they need to step back to dial up days 🙂 I know full well it is the terminal equipments that determine Symmetric service not the Fibre, fibre is just a glass tube that light travels down, it is the electronics that does the work. Openreach goes for the cheapest available technology and say that will do, I am not an Alt network fanboy, but I do like to support the smaller companies if i can afford to. A few years ago when I had a different job, and I was on ADSL, I used smaller providers, sadly I don’t have that luxury now.
I am glad there are alternatives, even for a small city like this, I just hope people will use them and not go straight to openreach network.
As for Angry man, I have no ideas.
@Ex Telecom Engineer:
Your reply clearly shows your BT bias here, as is evident with your note on customer satisfaction for BT. In reality, users see it differently, see e.g.
https://www.ispreview.co.uk/review/isp/bt/?category=17
or
https://uk.trustpilot.com/review/btbroadband.co.uk
And if it was that easy for an Openreach-based ISP to offer symmetric fibre broadband, then why don’t they, unlike many altnets?
Of course, Openreach only deals with CPs, not with end customers, I never said anything to the opposite.
I’m not sure why people are quoting static IPs or IPv6 as an altnet “feature”. That’s layer 3, so nothing to do with Openreach and everything to do with the ISP themselves. BT themselves of course already do have IPv6 enabled across their network, and they offer static IPs to business customers, let alone what the other Openreach ISPs may provide.
Going to an alt net may well make it worse, if it’s a new ISP with hardly any IPv4 address space and so needs to use CGNAT.
Openreach will sell whatever their CP customers want. If there was meaningful demand for symmetric service, they’d do it. Cityfibre and others have it because they think it is a differentiating factor, and they’re safe knowing that few of their customers will actually try to use it.
As for coverage, small towns etc – who’s doing more than Openreach to serve those places? Places that have never had competition already (ie Virgin) will probably never see an altnet, so it’ll be once again down to Openreach to do the areas that aren’t ultra profitable.
Good luck to Tom Williams and Lit Fibre, thank you for coming here and answering a few questions.
This is rather like it was when cable was deployed. There was a lot of money pumped into the deployment which left a lot of companies in financial strain. There is overbuilding which in the urban area isn’t going to diminish, and that will start to push out into smaller towns as time goes on.
As with the cable networks, there was amalgamation. This will happen with the alt-networks as funding dries up, or people decide on other networks. There have already been a few casualties and I’m sure more will go under over the next few years.
Have you ever thought about the huge amounts of money involved and why CEOs keep moving either their teams of spreadsheet jockies.
They are paying themselves an enormous salary and for what digging trenches and promoting a service that normally works on loosest cost wins.
Look at the reason, and what value is overbuild, look at the ceo of gigaclear to zzoom, flomatic to ogi, and the list goes on , what value do the board level bring, they know how to filter millions through, and would you guess they start themselves on 250k plus, time to wake up everyone ftth is a money filteration service, I met a man last week from island who has earns 21k in a week on a mini digger giving his Bert 120 a day, soft verge with a ditch witch, guess who owned the equipment. Wake Up
it is intersting how Openreach suddenly see areas where alt nets are being installed
Most Alt nets at presnt are having to work hard just to service the debt, higher interest rate increases will not help. Few if any are paing down the debt
Yep, not so long ago Openreach full fibre was only in a couple of roads here and was like that for a couple of years, now Zzoomm have got going here, Openreach seem to have woken up and gone mad, with one of the estates having a huge coverage already. Strange how Openreach seems to wake up when they have competition, before that they had little interest.
Reminds me of BBC local radio, had no interest here until a commercial radio station came.
@Ad47uk: I have seen similar situations in some nearby small towns. After an altnet (Lightspeed Broadband and LitFibre) started putting in fibre in areas which had no Openreach-based fibre, all out of a sudden Openreach started doing the same thing. Before it wasn’t supposed to be done till 2025/26 by Openreach, now there is the rush to put it all in as fast as possible. In fact, just had a chance today to speak to some Openreach engineers who were working on some fibre runs, who confirmed it.
Gnewton where is this @Ad47uk: I have seen similar situations in some nearby small towns. After an altnet (Lightspeed Broadband and LitFibre) st @Ad47uk: I have seen similar situations in some nearby small towns. After an altnet (Lightspeed Broadband and LitFibre) started putting in fibre in areas which had no Openreach-based fibre, all out of a sudden Openreach started doing the same thing. Before it wasn’t supposed to be done till 2025/26 by Openreach, now there is the rush to put it all in as fast as possible. In fact, just had a chance today to speak to some Openreach engineers who were working on some fibre runs, who confirmed it.
Just as easily find areas where altnets are building and openreach are not building. Given the size and scale of of openreach plans its hardly surprising they are going to trip over each other occasionally. Most of openreach plans are published with a long lead time giving altnets opportunity to get in there 1st
Fastman: please enough. It’s both obvious and sensible that Openreach would target areas where they’ve altnet competition.
The business case to roll out FTTP when you’re only competing against yourself is a bit thin. The business case when you’ve a competitor wanting to take your customers from you suddenly gets way more compelling.
There’s absolutely nothing wrong with Openreach doing this. It’s both good business and expected to deliver on the company’s duty to shareholders.
an engineer
really , Openreach have a very specific roll out plan updated at each quarter (wich advance notification for where the next 2 quarters are), the areas that lightspeed / and lit are operating are have no not been updated by openreach (so should not be in any near plan. not sure who you are !!! but have I extensive experience and understanding of both roll out plans especailly the openreach (probably more that you do) which is why i asked G newton the Question as this seems odd !!!
@Fastman: Where does Openreach publish such specific fibre rollout plans? The website at https://www.openreach.com/fibre-broadband/where-when-building-ultrafast-full-fibre-broadband is quite vague, you’ll often see areas marked as ‘To be built between April 2021 and December 2026’, which is pretty useless. Regularly checking roadworks.org often gives a clearer picture, as does talking with Openreach engineers who actually know what’s really happening on the ground.
I doubt the engineers will know where they will be working the day after tomorrow.
But if you are building fibre somewhere it is a pretty safe bet that you will not be alone. Be that Openreach, Virgin, CityFibre, Altnet or a combination of.
@GNewton, I never realised that out of reach have put fibre in so much of this city until I was checking some things out as I read and heard that Out of reach would be another couple of years at least. Zzoomm have certainly made out of reach move their backside, which is a bit of a shame, I had hoped Zzoomm would have had more of a head start to get customers. I presume Zzoomm must have looked into that building a fibre network here is worth the risk, even with competition, or that they had a load of money given them to do so. To be honest, I would not risk it in this city, it is full of older people and a lot of them will not bother about fibre.
Gnewton
as i said its quite detailed if you understand the roll out and you understand how you build FTTP networks and the leadtimes to build it and you know what to look for
@Fastman: You still haven’t provided your sources for the rollout plans. I guess it’s not publicly available? End customers can rightly expect telecoms to let them know when certain services will become available. It’s a shame telecoms can’t, or won’t. This is not just the case with BT/Openreach, but also with a few altnets, such as Lightspeed Broadband etc.
You can make all the claims you want @Fastman but where is the evidence to back it up?
Yes, Fastman, really.
If I owned shares in BT Group and they weren’t doing this I’d want to know why, however it’s as obvious and transparent as you could want to see that they are. Time after time after time CityFibre / Netomnia / A N Other altnet / whomever rock up and Openreach are surveying and starting build within months having not published any plans for those exchanges previously.
If the resources are already there, which they are, it’s not a massive leap to think that Openreach can and do move those resources around and change their focus. If the business is so lacking in agility that it can’t change priorities altnets are the least of its worries.
Aside from anything else altnets putting in PIA orders should get Openreach’s attention, and the altnets proving out Openreach infrastructure and repairing blocked ducts should immediately improve the business case to deploy.
I’m aware of the lead times to build from end to end. They’re irrelevant here. Openreach will be aware an altnet is surveying, they’ll have the requests for the network maps. Then they get the PIA orders starting to come in. It might take months to build FTTP from start to finish, it definitely doesn’t take months to start the process and some steps can be done in parallel. Perfectly possible to be installing new OLTs at the same time as performing the surveys or indeed the actual build in the field. Even with potentially long lead times on OLTs no reason to not be upgrading power and cooling if necessary, alongside building out the access network while waiting for the headend to be ready. Unless the existing OLTs are ECI-only or have no spare line card slots, unlikely, at least some premises can be brought live without too much work in the headend.
The point is to get FTTP built in time to give your CPs an opportunity to retain as much business as possible and for Openreach in turn to retain as many live customers as possible. Openreach should be able to build faster than any altnet and in the case of CityFibre, Virgin Media and some others way, way faster as those guys do a fair amount of civils building spine and some distribution.
I’m sure it doesn’t happen every time at every exchange but it most definitely does happen. There’s nothing wrong with this: it’s how it should be. I’m not sure why you’re so defensive about this. BT Wholesale did it with ADSL, Openreach are doing it with FTTP.