Firstly who says my views were aimed at you? Did i mention your name? Who is it a personal attack against?
Furthermore...
Isnt your current job that of a G.P at a practice in London and not that of an IT professional? So how would that "damage" your reputation as an IT professional?
The very fact you have turned up here trying to dismiss bad comments about BE though would tend to suggest the comment has merit.
You have turned up here to do nothing more than to cause trouble..........
I WOULD ALSO SAY TO STAFF WATCH OUT FOR FURTHER POSTS FROM PEOPLE THAT ON ANOTHER CERTAIN SITE DO NOT WANT ANYTHING NEGATIVELY SAID ABOUT BE TURNING UP HERE ALSO
As to what you find "extremely insulting, demeaning and offensive" I am more than willing to highlight to this entire forum some of the terminology you use towards people (THAT IS MORE THAN ONE PERSON BEFORE YOU SAY WHAT YOU SO OBVIOUSLY AND PREDICTABLY WILL STATE NEXT) on the internet.
Shall we start with how you accuse people with issues that conflict with your own opinions of being the same person on another ISP review based site and continually do it.
Shall we also highlight the name calling you aim towards more than a singular individual that has issues with BE?
Oh and how in general in your Usergroup role you dismiss any problems BE are having, to VARIOUS PEOPLE in various forums, until
more than a singular individual points out evidence BE are suffering problems including CONGESTION AND PEERING WHICH THE OP HERE POINTED OUT. Only then do you admit there is an issue. In fact lets list that example of your behaviour now shall we and your general attitude towards those that complain about BEs problems.
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/beunlimited/4028799-network-problems-again.html
This is just an example of how you deal with people that confirm there is an issue with BE...
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/beunlimited/t/4035581-network-problems-again.html
As to this....
Add to that a good few of the recent negative reviews seems to be very, very similar in nature, language and style and if by the same person would be clear contravention of the rules here.
If that is aimed at me? Ill tell you right now i have one account here, and have never had an account previously on ISPreview nor reviewed ANY ISP here previously... That was until i was so disgusted with BE as a provider, its usergroup members mentality which you are demonstrating here and i can show you have demonstrated elsewhere, rude staff and in general poor performing service that i decided to sign up and tell people just how horrid the whole thing is.
Be very careful of the false accusations you continually are making around the internet towards people, because i wont stand for them.
YOU and a few other desperate supporters of BE have already made false claims about another user negatively reviewing BE on this site more than once. As i pointed out above. Do not even try to do that to me. I have reviewed them here once and once only.
Its no wonder why the OP of this thread, myself and recent reviews on here are so disgusted with BE.
The service stinks, your accusations, stink and perhaps if you find terminology like "fangirl" so offensive then maybe you should not as a so called "usergroup" member of the ISP concerned hurl abuse at the users on other forums.
What a fine company face you are, making false accusations about people.
If staff would like me to alter my review and remove any terminology within it they are more than free to ask me to do so and i will more than freely comply.........
It wont help your hopeless moral cause of defending BE though the service is still rubbish and it will still score the lowest mark possible.
In fact i dont even know what your moral crusade is towards this company which clearly has ongoing issues, which can be clearly proven with the link above which ive posted, the constant near daily issues the usergroup reports and so much more. (All of which im more than happy to show as i stated from the outset ill prove any claim that i make that needs backing up).
I suggest you go back to thinkbroadband and make your wild accusations on there like you have been doing, where they tolerate you and others individuals that mooch around the internet accusing people of multi reviewing BE because its for the negative. They probably tolerate you and that other person i have mentioned above to cyclope because one of the top staff at that site is an ISPA judge which like you must love BE to vote for them in awards.
Apologies to staff here in advance but this individual is rude to others on another site we dont need their rudeness, false accusations, trouble making and in general attempts to deny BE have issues and censor those issues here.
WE DONT NEED YOUR "FACTS" EITHER NREDWOOD where you accuse users of posting on BEs forums with other accounts when they are banned from them.
Shall i link to that debate also which you had previously accusing a person of stating something they never did?
EDIT: I particularly like this defense for BE........
http://forums.thinkbroadband.com/beunlimited/t/4036770-network-problems-again.html
Consumer ISP, not like Easynet????
Oh is that why BE have a Wholesale division and flog their product to other ISPs and have staff running on here in news items moaning about other organisations billing mess ups when BE itself have a slap happy prior history at sending in debt collectors (Which again can be proven).
LOL in short go away...