Fair usage & throttling
I accept without reserve that my usage is high. I don't have a television and much of my entertainment needs are met by streaming media and P2P over the internet.
It seems to me that ISP's are not offering the services that consumers actually require. They are offering the services that benefit themselves. No surprise there!
The packages they offer should be based upon usage requirements and not upon the speed of a service. I note a number of reports in a similar vein on Google news today.
http://www.t3.com/news/o2-uk-broadband-users-wasting-over-%C2%A32m-a-day?=48781
When I buy goods or services anywhere else, I expect to receive them in full without unreasonable restriction. I do not buy "up to" a gallon of petrol for example. Or "up to" 38 miles worth of fuel. I would not accept only 1/64th of the goods/service I am paying for in this example. Why should I accept it from my ISP without question?
When I am charged for a service of up to 8mb/sec I do not expect that service to be restricted so severely that I receive only 1/64th of the service I am paying for. Bearing in mind that these charges are set by the ISP and not myself.
I would describe that as legalised theft! And at the very least miss-selling their product!
Perhaps ISP's should be more transparent about their "Unfair Charging Policy" (UCP's) rather than penalising their customers with their so-called "Fair Usage Policies" (FUP's). Making an acronym of something doesn't make it any more palatable, does it?