Judylegal1973
Regular Member
I work for a surveyor that was submitting 5G mast planning applications.
On advice from the Telcoms we were using an entity that was disolved and never belonged to the Telcom - ICNIRP declaration.
Thanks to months of NIMBY complaints we are now in hot water with our regulator, we are also being threatened with legal action by members of the public unhappy about their masts. We think the Telcom is in greater trouble at a Government level and with the SFO.
It’s scientifically proven as completely safe, most argue it’s safer than 4G.
Can anyone explain the rationale why a Telcomunication company might have done this? We flagged this early and they insisted we continued with the false entity.
We think their actions have significantly harmed the 5G rollout.
I won’t mention names, so please don’t ask.
Thanks,
On advice from the Telcoms we were using an entity that was disolved and never belonged to the Telcom - ICNIRP declaration.
Thanks to months of NIMBY complaints we are now in hot water with our regulator, we are also being threatened with legal action by members of the public unhappy about their masts. We think the Telcom is in greater trouble at a Government level and with the SFO.
It’s scientifically proven as completely safe, most argue it’s safer than 4G.
Can anyone explain the rationale why a Telcomunication company might have done this? We flagged this early and they insisted we continued with the false entity.
We think their actions have significantly harmed the 5G rollout.
I won’t mention names, so please don’t ask.
Thanks,
Last edited:























