
Alternative rural UK broadband ISP Airband, which has built a full fibre (FTTP) and wireless (FWA) network that covers parts of Wales and South West England, has shared a copy of their latest group accounts with ISPreview and revealed that they expect to reach EBITDA positivity in 2028. But the provider is still facing a “material uncertainty” over its funding.
Just to put this into some context. Airband recently went through a period of restructuring, which resulted in a fair few jobs losses and a switch to focus on commercialising their existing network (as opposed to new infrastructure build). The situation reflected some of the same pressures as other operators have been facing (e.g. high interest rates, rising build costs and strong competition).
In terms of the provider’s current network reach, the new accounts, which aren’t yet public, don’t seem to provide any updated figures. But Airband has previously said that their UK broadband network now spanned “more than 440,000 premises in over 200 communities across 7 counties“ (here), which we were told breaks down as being 175,000 premises via “fibre” (FTTP) and 265,000 premises via wireless (FWA) – all Ready for Service. The operator did, however, inform ISPreview that they expected to end 2025 with 30,000 customers.
Advertisement
The new accounts for Airband Topco Limited typically start off by saying that they “present a compelling picture of a business that has not only weathered structural change but has emerged from it stronger, more focused, and better positioned for growth“. The operator then points to how the recent restructuring has resulted in a “reduction of legacy cost structures, simplification of internal processes, and consolidation of project delivery teams” that has delivered a “leaner and more agile organisation“.
The operator now promises to be sharply focused on accelerating the commercialisation of its business to “drive sustainable revenue growth” and work towards achieving EBITDA (i.e. earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortisation) positivity by 2028. Take note that while such a result, once achieved, would indicate that a company’s core operations are starting to become profitable (banks use this to help assess whether a company is able to pay off its debts), EBITDA itself doesn’t fully consider everything and there’s still a long road ahead.
Speaking of which, the group’s annual revenues to December 2024 increased by 37% of £6,667,000, while their total staffing count fell from 451 to 285. The operating loss increased to -£47.23m (2023: -£37.06m), which was due to “increased investment in staff to drive the growth of the organisation and increased depreciation of the growing network“. Otherwise, the company reported total assets of £179.81m and total liabilities of -£224.92m.
Despite the positive post-restructuring progress, Airband’s accounts do make reference to a “material uncertainty” that exists over the group’s ability to fund itself after a key deadline passed on 1st September 2025.
Advertisement
Airband’s Funding Statement
After the year end, to support the revised strategy the shareholders extended the convertible loan facility by a further £27.8 million (and further funding at the option of the shareholder). The convertible loan facilities drawn down as at the date of approval of the financial statements of £132.9 million are in place until 27 March 2027 and are secured by fixed and floating charges over the subsidiary’s assets.
The Group has prepared a cashflow forecast, including all subsidiary undertakings for a period of 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements. The revised funding requirement of the business exceeds the current available facilities and new funding will be required from 1 September 2025. The base forecast shows the available convertible loans provide the cash required by the Group to operate and pay its debts as they fall due for payment in the period to 31 August 2025.
The Directors are confident that the operating expenditure can be managed within the funds available to 31 August 2025 and that further funding will be secured to allow the Group and Company to continue in operation for at least until 18 July 2026. On this basis, the Directors have concluded that it is reasonable to assume the Group and Company are able to adequately fund its operations for the foreseeable future, being 12 months from the date of approval of these financial statements.
As at the date of approval of these financial statements, as further funding required by the Group and Company from 1 September 2025 has not been identified and secured, including any additional funding from its major shareholder which may be needed in the period to 30 September 2026 has not been guaranteed. The Directors consider that these events and conditions indicate that there is a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about the Group’s and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include the adjustments that would be necessary if the Group and Company are unable to continue as a going concern.
The caveat above is that Airband has made similar statements in past accounts and they usually do manage to find solutions, eventually. So, while the language may sound worrying, it’s worth not taking this too much at face value because the operator’s recent improvements suggest they may yet be able to find a solution for the next year.
UPDATE 11:16am
Airband informs us that their accounts were signed off on 18th July 2025 and “we have since secured additional funding which will be detailed in the 2025 statutory accounts“.
Be interesting to see how the customer count splits between FWA and FTTP. 7% take up sounds pretty anemic but I’m guessing you don’t need the take up rate with FWA as FTTP.
Hats off to the person that sent the accounts to the press.
The banks stopped funding this years ago. It’s a continuing exercise in economic incompetence for the investors to keep putting money in. This should have been put into administration ages ago.
Using their words to understand their plan “Central to this strategy is the ongoing disruption of the UK fibre market
through the rollout of its groundbreaking 1Gbps fixed wireless connectivity—delivering fibre-like speeds without the cost or delays associated with traditional fibre builds.”
The plan was to blow 300milly on fibre and slow wireless to rise like a phoenix with the new thing? That new thang is going to have a value of more than the lost cheddar even though it’s the same people that lost the cheddar last time. Next year Rodney we will be millionaires.
The cash going into this thang must b from a charity where the directors have an indemnitee from the people paying for it all.
Not filing accounts, pouring millions of other people’s money into a structure that isn’t ever going to repay it. Bad for the industry and bad bad bad.
Was there an award at connected Britain for bravest directors?
This company won’t ever repay its dept and directors have due-tees. Problee they have an indemnitee from the peepal putting the money in but it’s reel cash when all is sed and dun.
Airband Topco Limited (13355635) have not filed their accounts and they are late. This is a breach of law. Interesting here is the accounts exist and are signed. The questions journalists should be asking
Why are accounts that exist not being filed in a wilful breach of law?
What information is in them that should be in the public domain that is worth breaching law for to keep out of the public domain?
Normally breach of law causes issues with other contracts and possibly insurance policies that cover the directors. There is something that is being hidden. What it is and from whom is the question.
It’s sadly not uncommon for quite a few companies to be listed as “late” in filing their accounts, and the automatic penalty for this is a tiny fine. In this case, it’s currently only a couple of days past that 30th Sept deadline, so nothing worth worrying about.. yet.
The fact Airband shared their full accounts with us means that what you’re seeing on Companies House is probably more likely to reflect the usual admin/processing delay. Sometimes accounts can be filed on time, but CH might not show this for a few days or weeks.