Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Study Finds Amazon Leo’s Broadband Satellites are a Bit too Bright

Monday, Feb 2nd, 2026 (4:35 pm) - Score 1,160
Amazon-Project-Kuiper-Rocket-Top-2025-ULA

A new study has provisionally found that Amazon Leo (formerly Project Kuiper), which is in the early stages of launching a new mega constellation of ultrafast broadband satellites into Low Earth Orbit (LEO) for the UK and globally, suffers from an all too familiar problem of being a bit too bright – potentially enough to disrupt observational sciences (astronomy).

The new service is currently in the commercial beta phase and will start to launch properly through 2026. The service currently has approval to deploy and operate their own initial constellation of 3,236 LEO satellites (altitudes of between 590km to 630km). A total of over 180 Kuiper satellites have already been placed into orbit (they need at least 500 for basic global coverage) and many more are due to follow over the next few years.

NOTE: Amazon Leo is expected to cost up to around $20bn (£14.9bn) to deliver, using a mix of rockets from ULA, Arianespace, Blue Origin and even SpaceX, by around 2030/31.

However, a new study from a group of astronomers affiliated with the International Astronomical Union (IAU) suggests that Amazon’s service, which is designed to compete with the likes of SpaceX’s Starlink constellation, also appears to suffer from the same brightness problem that we’ve seen occurring across various LEO satellite networks – some more than others.

Advertisement

Just to recap. The IAU recommends that LEO satellites should have a maximum brightness of magnitude +7 at altitudes of up to 550km. On this scale, the brightest objects actually have the smallest numbers (e.g. brilliant Venus can reach up to -4.6, while the North Star is dimmer at +2). If satellites are too bright then that can make it much harder to picture the night sky and do other things, such as to spot dangerous asteroids or detect key celestial events.

According to the new study, which used data collected from nearly 2,000 observations of Amazon’s new satellites, the brightness distribution of satellites at 630km was compared against the IAU’s recommended limits. “For satellites in their operational mode, 92.0% of observations exceed the research limit, while 24.7% exceed the aesthetic limit,” said the study.

The aesthetic limit reflects a Magnitude of 6 (i.e. objects that can be seen at locations where the sky is minimally affected by light pollution). You can see how the various constellations compare below.

LEO-Satellite-Magnitude-Readings-Feb-2026

Advertisement

Study Conclusion

The mean apparent magnitude of all Amazon Leo satellites is 6.28 based on 1,938 observations. For spacecraft in their operational mode, 92% exceeded the IAU brightness limit for interference with research, while 25% distract from aesthetic appreciation of the night sky.

The reflective characteristics are similar to Version 1 Starlink spacecraft. Both strongly scatter sunlight forward and backward. Based on private communication, Amazon is working on reducing satellite brightness.

The Amazon Leo constellation spacecraft are potentially impacting astronomical research and aesthetic appreciation of the night sky.

Brightness statistics for all major satellite constellations are kept up to date at our website, https://satmags.netlify.app/ .

At present this is less of a concern because Amazon has only launched 180 satellites, but it becomes more of a problem once thousands are up in the sky. For its part, Amazon Leo says they’re working with astronomers to help reduce the brightness problem, which has included “applying a custom dielectric film and non-reflective coating on all of our operational spacecraft,” said a spokesperson (credits to PC Mag). But by the sounds of it, this is already present on their existing satellites. Suffice to say, more changes may be required.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Tags: ,
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
1 Response

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

    I know it will never happen, but it is a shame that we just don’t have one network up there and then the others use it, instead of sending a load of crap up there like they are doing now.
    The problem would be who would run the network, and it would have to be a non-profit-making company.
    As I said, sadly it will not happen, with Musk and others wanting more and more control, hopefully they will start smashing into each other.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
264Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £24.99
145Mbps
Gift: £145 Reward Card
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £24.99
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £16.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £20.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
O2 UK ISP Logo
O2 £21.24
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
New Forum Topics
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Beebu UK ISP Logo
Beebu £23.00
100 - 160Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact