» ISP News » 

UPD 3 ISPs Snub BSG Launch of New UK Net Neutrality Code of Practice

Wednesday, July 25th, 2012 (9:33 am) - Score 715

The Broadband Stakeholders Group (BSG), a UK government supported think-tank, has launched a new Voluntary Code of Practice to ensure “the provision of full and open internet access” and to prevent ISPs using Traffic Management practices to “degrade the services of a competitor“. But three of the country’s largest ISPs have refused to join.

It’s understood that the Open Internet Code of Practice has so far been signed by 10 major telecoms operators (e.g. BT, TalkTalk, Sky Broadband, O2 / BE Broadband, KC, PlusNet, GiffGaff, Tesco Mobile and Three UK etc.), yet Everything Everywhere (T-Mobile and Orange UK), Virgin Media and Vodafone felt that the code was either too vague or not practical enough to meet the modern day reality of internet provision.

Ed Vaizey, Minister for Communications, said:

This voluntary agreement is great news for consumers. It marks a significant commitment from the leading ISPs to uphold the principles of an open internet and gives certainty to their customers. The internet has been built on openness and low barriers to entry, and this agreement will ensure that continues. By committing to transparency, these ISPs are empowering their customers to make informed decisions about the services they want.”

Pamela Learmonth, CEO of the Broadband Stakeholder Group, said:

With this code ISPs are making practical, tangible commitments to the open internet. The open internet model has long supported the innovation of new services and allowed consumers to discover informative, useful and creative applications, services and content and this must continue. At the same time the code will also support an environment where new business models for internet-based services to the benefit of consumer choice can be developed.”

At present most ISPs employ Traffic Management or Traffic Shaping as a perfectly acceptable means to balance the performance of their networks, which allows the majority of customers to avoid being unfairly affected by a minority of heavy users. This is often done by restricting internet traffic (speed) to busy services (e.g. P2P) or more generally at peak times of day.

Many ISPs prefer the above method to either raising prices or being more realistic about their usage allowances. Sadly some operators are known to restrict certain services, such as VoIP (e.g. Skype) and P2P (File Sharing), to such an extreme that they are no longer usable. Similarly a number of operators have IPTV services, such as BT and TalkTalk, which require flexibility in order to favour content from specific providers.

At the same time many consumers remain concerned that ISPs could potentially abuse their position by favouring content providers based on who pays them the most cash. So far this Digital Mafia style model hasn’t worked because of regulatory concerns, the fear of upsetting users (i.e. imagine if Skype, Facebook or Google stopped working) and the simple fact that most content providers have no interest in paying twice for their bandwidth or being charged into oblivion.

As a result of all this the BSG last year introduced the first pilot of their voluntary Traffic Management code (here), which required ISPs to describe their restrictions in more detail and explain how different types of services might be affected by such policies. The new code is the finalised version of that and includes three key commitments.

The 3 New Open Internet Code Commitments

1. Ensure that full and open internet access products, with no blocked services, will be the norm within their portfolio of products.

2. Provide greater transparency in instances where certain classes of legal content, applications and/or services are unavailable on a product. These products will not be marketed as “internet access” and signatories will be obliged to ensure that any restrictions are clearly communicated to consumers.

3. Not [to] target and degrade the content or applications of specific providers.

In fairness the code is, as Vodafone and EE claim, somewhat vague. On the other hand it also makes specific exceptions for any court ordered requirements (e.g. piracy website blocking) or the Internet Watch Foundation’s (IWF) measures to filter out illegal child abuse websites. Likewise Parental Controls, Traffic Management measures to manage normal congestion and or service restrictions (e.g. data caps), such as those imposed as part of a users contract, are also not covered.

So far both the European Commission (EC) and Ofcom have called upon broadband ISPs to ensure that consumers continue to benefit from access to all “legal content [and] service[s]” (here), although nobody has seen a need to impose any form of mandatory regulation.

Open Internet Code of Practice (PDF)

UPDATE 12:17pm

The Internet Telephony Services Providers Association (ITSPA) has welcomed the new code but is disappointed that not all communications providers signed up.

Eli Katz, Chair of ITSPA, said:

ITSPA welcomes this excellent initiative and is grateful for the work conducted by the BSG to get to this point. Our members have long been concerned about some of the traffic management and transparency practices of certain CPs, particularly by some mobile operators. It is unfortunate however that not all CPs have signed up, as ITSPA feels that all consumers should have the ability to clearly determine whether or not their internet access is truly open.

It is vital that all of industry endorses this document to ensure consumers are provided with more transparent information and that new and innovative Internet services can grow, without fear of anti-competitive behaviour.

We applaud the signatories, including O2 and Three, in their approach to traffic management practices, in particular allowing VoIP services and not adding in charges. ITSPA would encourage all major MNOs as well as all fixed line providers to sign up to this code. We also look forward to Ofcom’s upcoming review of traffic management practices this summer, to ensure all CPs are following the principles outlined by the Communications Minister. This is an opportunity for the UK to lead the world in net neutrality, which will allow the communications industry to build innovative new services, benefit consumers, and grow UK businesses.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
5 Responses
  1. Avatar The Builder says:

    This is really a trick one! but this is what i think.
    As much as it is consumer’s responsility to download contents with fair usage, it also ISP’s responsibility to ensure they can deal with surge of traffic during peak time or any other time. You will always have small group of people trying to get more than their fair share but you also have large group of people who are more likely to use less than half of their share.

    If ISPs can’t cope with the surge of traffic to provide their majority subscribers good quality of service then it is probably time for them to upgrade their technology/infrastructure.

  2. Avatar Kyle says:

    Interesting to see that Everything Everywhere are sticking by their stance and not allowing VOIP. When are they going to realise that people will eventually realise that they can switch to a provider that does allow such use?

    It just appears to be a very naive move.

  3. Avatar Deduction says:

    Pointless regulation again that will conflict with things that are happening to the internet in this country…….

    QUOTE”1. Ensure that full and open internet access products, with no blocked services,….”

    How half of the can sign this then when they have blocked pirate bay is anyones guess, not to mention more than a couple throttle P2P to stupid slow levels and nowhere (NOT even in the small print) do they tell you what speed they throttle to (BT and Talk Talk as 2 examples). In fact Plusnet AFAIK are the only ones that specifically mention speeds services like p2p will be throttled by.

    Even more ironic, Virgin who refuse to sign it already detail speed restrictions.

    It looks to me like some set up by the government to try to convince the stupid they want the internet kept open. Pity not everyone is dumb enough to fall for it.

    1. Avatar zemadeiran says:

      Spot on Deduction!

      Jobs for the boys etc. ISP will naturally prioritise protocols in order to provide reliable connection for RTP SIP et all.

      If they also add bandwidth restriction then that is their prerogative. If your isp blocks voip for example, CHANGE isp…

      Vote with your feet and hit them where it hurts…

    2. Avatar zemadeiran says:

      I fully understand that there is also a flip side to all this and the need to force isp’s to provide unhindered service.

      What if your choice is limited to a monopoly?

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Onestream £19.99 (*27.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £21.00 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £21.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • NOW TV £22.00 (*40.00)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2899)
  2. BT (2823)
  3. FTTC (1811)
  4. Building Digital UK (1771)
  5. Politics (1709)
  6. Openreach (1664)
  7. Business (1490)
  8. FTTH (1343)
  9. Mobile Broadband (1279)
  10. Statistics (1271)
  11. 4G (1103)
  12. Fibre Optic (1084)
  13. Wireless Internet (1047)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1042)
  15. Virgin Media (1034)
  16. EE (729)
  17. Vodafone (707)
  18. TalkTalk (689)
  19. Sky Broadband (685)
  20. 5G (568)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact