» ISP News, Key Developments » 

Ofcom to Tackle Unfair and Harmful Practices by UK Broadband ISPs

Monday, June 17th, 2019 (9:36 am) - Score 1,435

The national UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has today begun a new consultation that seeks views on their plans to create a new Fairness Framework (guidelines), which will be designed to explain to broadband, phone and TV providers how they will consider whether their practices and the way they treat their customers is fair.

The move is intended to complement the recent “Fairness for Customers” commitment, which saw Ofcom asking broadband and mobile providers to voluntarily commit themselves to supporting a series of customer promises in respect to various areas including their quality of support, clarity of information and fairness in pricing etc.

By contrast the new Fairness Framework is centred on how Ofcom will actually assess “fairness” in the regulatory sense, such as in terms of identifying and then “stamping out unfair and harmful practices.” Arguably this might seem like something that the regulator has already been doing on many different occasions via their past rulings, although they haven’t underlined this before with a clear framework.

As such the new discussion document (PDF) highlights the type of company practices that Ofcom is most likely to see as unfair, and which may lead to regulatory action. One example is companies attempting to mislead their customers or take advantage of those who may be less able to choose the best deal for their needs (e.g. vulnerable consumers like pensioners)

The Framework also sets out the kinds of issues the regulator will examine when they assess whether a company is treating its customers fairly. These include the importance of the service in question; the degree of potential harm; and which customers are affected – for example, customers who may be in vulnerable circumstances.

Ofcom – What we are proposing (in brief)

We have set out the types of questions and factors we would consider in assessing whether customers are being treated fairly.

Our duties are underpinned by securing fair outcomes for customers and we act where necessary to protect people from harmful practices. This paper sets out our proposed approach to identifying whether people are being treated fairly or whether there are unfair practices we need to address. We set out five key questions for this purpose, including:

(i) How do providers treat customers throughout the customer journey?
(ii) Who is being harmed?
(iii) What is the extent of the harm?
(iv) How important is the service?
(v) Does the service depend on risky new investment?

We recognise that these kinds of assessments can be complex and invite comments on our proposed approach.

We view this discussion paper as part of a wider debate about securing fair outcomes for customers. Assessing whether a certain practice is fair or unfair is not always straightforward, particularly where some people benefit while others lose out. This can make it challenging to determine whether and how best to deliver fairer outcomes. This paper is designed to create a shared understanding of how Ofcom is likely to approach considering whether certain practices are fair for customers in broadband, mobile, home phone and pay-TV markets.

As part of Ofcom’s assessment of fairness, and of whether and how they should address any unfairness, the regulator said they would be “likely to consider how far providers are living up to the six individual commitments” set out in their recent ‘Fairness for Customers’ scheme. “The approach we take will be applied flexibly, considering fairness in the round. It is not intended to be a static approach and it would be adapted as new issues arise,” said the document.

Sharon White, Ofcom’s Outgoing CEO, said:

“Our fairness programme is delivering real benefits for customers – putting money in their pockets and helping more people get fairer deals.

Everyone should expect to be treated fairly from their provider, but that hasn’t always happened in the past. There is now a real chance to change that.

It’s vital we don’t chase the wrong solution to complex problems, which would see many customers worse off. So government, regulators and consumer bodies must all work together to ensure customers get a fair deal.”

Ofcom plans to publish further “targeted measures on fairness, based on our evidence, in the coming weeks.” We believe this is a reference to how they will ensure clear-cut contracts for people who pay for their mobile services and handsets together etc.

Meanwhile they are inviting views on the draft Fairness Framework, with all responses to be provided by 12th August 2019.

ofcom fairness assessment

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
11 Responses
  1. Joe says:

    What a load a buzzword bingo and platitudes.

    1. dragoneast says:

      … designed to appeal to Boris.

    2. Joe says:

      This is ofcom so not really…

  2. spurple says:

    A sensible policy option under this umbrella would be mandatory no-contract broadband options (pay in advance), so that people with adverse credit for whatever reason, aren’t frozen out of what has become an essential part of modern life.

    1. Mark Jackson says:

      I suspect Ofcom would reason that you can already choose from plenty of ISPs that do monthly contract options (let’s not call them “no contract” as that’s misleading – there’s always a legal contract).

    2. spurple says:

      @Mark Jackson: fair point. I hope that continues to be case, and that such consumers don’t pay an unreasonable penalty in the prices they can get.

    3. Joe says:

      There are plenty of PAYG type deals now both on landline and mobile (wifi routers) so no worries there. Many are cheaper than the premium ISPs already. Why people seem to think that they ought to pay only marginally dissimilar rates for a month -v- 12 or 18 amazes me but that seems to be the underlying belief in much of the ‘unreasonable penalty’ arguments.

  3. JamesMJohnson says:

    What’s unfair is…
    Ordering FTTPoD and being tied to a contract charging a remarkable mark-up vs WBC FTTP (Native). Anyone else who orders FTTP onwards from the FTTPoD going live get it as a native solution effectively.

    FTTPoD should be an infrastructure/line upgrade separate from the ISP contract and the person who ordered it should get a rebate for each separate order that utilises it.
    FTTPoD Cost -> Native FTTP package subscription -> Rebate for each additional premises served.

    1. Joe says:

      You get a properties passed fee. But frankly OR aren’t making much money from fttpod to give you a ‘rebate’

    2. JamesMJohnson says:

      You misunderstand my point Joe…
      I’m saying that you should pay for the line as a once off installation.
      Then you should be charged by your ISP the standard “native” FTTP prices (there is like a £100 a month difference between the 2 types).
      Effectively if you order FTTPoD (can’t atm) then you’re locked into £130+ a month whilst your neighbours then pay £40 a month.
      That’s the point I’m getting at.

  4. xyz says:

    Sounds like it’s aimed towards Virgin.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Gigaclear £17.00
    Speed: 200Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Community Fibre £17.99
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £24.00
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £25.00
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £25.00
    Speed: 158Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo code: BIGBANG
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £17.99
    Speed 33Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo code: BIGBANG
  • Shell Energy £20.99
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW £22.00
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £75 Reward Card
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (4209)
  2. BT (3182)
  3. Politics (2150)
  4. Building Digital UK (2042)
  5. Openreach (1997)
  6. FTTC (1931)
  7. Business (1867)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1630)
  9. Statistics (1525)
  10. 4G (1398)
  11. FTTH (1372)
  12. Virgin Media (1301)
  13. Ofcom Regulation (1251)
  14. Fibre Optic (1246)
  15. Wireless Internet (1244)
  16. Vodafone (940)
  17. 5G (923)
  18. EE (920)
  19. TalkTalk (832)
  20. Sky Broadband (795)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact