Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

Connexin Temporarily Pauses Broadband Pole Installations in Hull UPDATE

Thursday, Apr 11th, 2024 (7:56 am) - Score 1,720
Connexin-FTTP-Engineer-up-Pole

Following a “productive meeting” with KCOM yesterday, alternative UK broadband ISP Connexin has announced that they will “temporarily pause” the deployment of new telecoms poles in parts of Hull and the East Riding of Yorkshire (England) as they “explore the viability” of the incumbents recent infrastructure sharing offer.

KCOM has already deployed a gigabit-capable Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) broadband network across the entirety of Hull and also holds Significant Market Power (SMP) in that area, which is something that new entrants like Connexin and MS3 have long been seeking to change.

In an ideal world, KCOM’s rivals would love to run at least some of their new fibre cables via the incumbents existing cable ducts and poles. But while this approach works well with Openreach’s regulated Physical Infrastructure Access (PIA) product (saving time and money), it’s long been a different story with KCOM.

Advertisement

The law does require KCOM to fairly share access to their existing infrastructure in Hull (ATI Regulations). However, rival operators expecting the same level of access, flexibility and affordability as the regulated PIA solution from Openreach have often run into problems with KCOM’s confidential commercial terms, which up until recently were allegedly placing an unfeasibly high price on access.

The situation meant that KCOM’s rivals often ended up having to build lots of new infrastructure, such as poles, which tends to irritate local communities – especially those that have previously only had underground cables. In recent months, this also has become a political issue (here and here) and the government even called on operators to “limit installation of telegraph poles” (here), while Ofcom warned that it lacked that power (here).

A Change in Approach

After coming under increasing pressure to resolve the impasse, KCOM recently shared the confidential results of a recent “feasibility study“ into infrastructure sharing (PIA) with Connexin, which was promptly criticised by their CEO, Furqan Alamgir, who said (here): “KCOM’s feasibility report is merely a 10-page document full of blank spaces and bullet points containing “high level estimates” no firm pricing, no committed timing, and no conclusion as to whether they deem infrastructure sharing feasible or not. This from a company that says it is committed to infrastructure sharing!

In response, KCOM, which said they were “surprised and disappointed to read the negative response“, proposed a “quicker way forward” to Connexin and MS3 (here). The plan involved the formation of an industry-led partnership to help co-develop a new pathway to accessing their existing ducts and telegraph poles to run new fibre, which could be delivered expediently and efficiently and “does not require complex new systems before it can be delivered“.

Advertisement

KCOM said they expected to work with Connexin and MS3 initially in targeted local areas over the next few months to see if this solution could work across the Hull region that it serves. Connexin has today responded to that by announcing a “temporarily pause” on the roll-out of new broadband poles in “parts” of Hull and the East Riding of Yorkshire as they “explore the viability” of KCOM’s proposal.

A Connexin spokesperson said:

“As a community-focused business, we have tirelessly campaigned for infrastructure sharing over the past two years. Our preferred method to grow our network, is to access existing infrastructure, in the same manner that all other internet service providers, outside the Hull telecoms area, are able to do with the Openreach network which covers the rest of the UK.

Our engagement with Ofcom, the government, local MPs, councillors, campaigners and residents, has led to increased pressure on KCOM, to share its existing network infrastructure more widely and fairly with other local providers. While KCOM has only talked of access in a limited area, we would like this to be extended to all KCOM SMP areas in line with the rest of the UK, to facilitate healthy competition for the benefit of customers in Hull and East Riding.

While we enter into detailed negotiations with KCOM we will temporarily pause the planned installation of poles in parts of Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire. This will mean a slowdown of our overall network build in the area, although we will continue to connect poles we have already placed.

As long as KCOM follows through on their offer with concrete processes and pricing for access to their infrastructure, we will continue to do what we believe is best for the community and what we have long campaigned for. This does not affect Connexin’s build plans in other parts of the UK.”

The announcement doesn’t clarify precisely which “parts” of the area are impacted by this pause (we’re trying to get an answer on that), and nor does Connexin specify the duration of the pause in pole installations. But the operator is clear that it wants to “show its intent to work collaboratively to the benefit of the wider community” in its ongoing negotiations with KCOM.

Connexin added that it was now “pleased with progress since KCOM’s March 26th letter offering to move more quickly towards network sharing” and it will continue its “robust engagement” with KCOM to “deliver the best possible outcome for residents in Hull and East Riding“. No doubt any frustrated local residents will reserve their judgement on this until they know the outcome and whether the pause benefits their streets.

KCOM previously said that they intended to launch the new process (trial/pilot) by May 2024, with the aim to see results from this new initiative by the summer. The incumbent is also no doubt being mindful of the fact that Ofcom recently began researching for their next Telecoms Access Review 2026 (here), which could potentially look to impose a regulated PIA-like solution on them if the industry-led approach fails.

Advertisement

Suffice to say, KCOM would probably prefer to avoid a strict response from Ofcom, while Connexin may not wish to wait the two years it would take before Ofcom actually implements something useful. Put another way, both operators now have some interest in being able to find common ground, but it remains to be seen whether the ship they attempt to build can stay afloat.

UPDATE 9:38am

In regard to which “parts” of Hull and East Yorkshire the pause impacts, Connexin has clarified to ISPreview that they are actually pausing across the “whole Hull telecoms area“, albeit with a focus on the areas where they are actively building, or planning to build at the moment (e.g. Beverley, Molescroft, Hedon and Hessle etc.). As above, none of this impacts their other deployments outside this region, but in those areas they can often harness Openreach’s existing network.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Tags: , ,
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
17 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo James says:

    Do we know if MS3 have come to the same arrangement with KCOM?

    1. Avatar photo XGS says:

      No arrangement has been made yet.

      Unless KCom have given MS3 access to the offer they won’t know what it is to study how viable it is.

      KCom hold all the cards.

    2. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      It’s also a bit more tedious for MS3 as they’re due to finish their network deployment in Hull by the end of the year, which doesn’t leave much time for all this.

  2. Avatar photo XGS says:

    So much for them not wanting to share infrastructure but being desperate to build an asset to sell on despite their building a tenth of the pole count outside of that area and making extensive use of Openreach PIA.

  3. Avatar photo CS says:

    They haven’t paused work. Still installing poles in Beverley today

    1. Avatar photo XGS says:

      They didn’t say they had.

  4. Avatar photo HullGuy says:

    So Connexin have actually kept to their word and have done exactly what they said they would all along… push KCOM to share infrastructure fairly whilst giving hull houses choice. Bet those protesters will still try and find every way to tear down connexin. Can’t do right for doing wrong. MS3 should follow suit in my opinion.

    Maybe they should open their eyes and see that whether they liked it or not this is what it took to get KCOM to stop ripping people in Hull off. WAKE UP PEOPLE. KCOM was the problem all along, just like everyone has been saying for the last 70+ years.

  5. Avatar photo BeverleyJR says:

    This seems like a knee-jerk reaction by Connexin. They are halting their build when they dont even have an agreement with Kcom in place. More like a publicity stunt to gain support and push Kcom into a corner to rush this through.

    1. Avatar photo Paul Brayford says:

      As a publicity stunt it has backfired badly.

    2. Avatar photo XGS says:

      This post next to the one above it are priceless.

  6. Avatar photo Paul Brayford says:

    What we know is that Connexin have not yet paused in the Hull telephone area. Their PR man says it could take two weeks to stop and they will carry on to finish areas they have startd.. Their contractors turned up on site today at 7:30 with no knowledge of this and carried on as normal. Much to residents’ distress and anger.

    We fight on.

    1. Avatar photo XGS says:

      You’d prefer they cancel all in progress jobs, including the ones booked, abruptly leaving the people on the ground with no work and no income I take it?

      It isn’t as simple as deciding on a halt and it immediately taking effect. There are moving parts and contractual obligations.

      Connexin evidently rather naively thought residents wouldn’t assume work would halt the day of an announcement that they ‘will pause’, future tense, build.

  7. Avatar photo Joyce Whittle says:

    @XGS do you honestly believe this decision was made on a whim yesterday .Connexin will have had chance to inform their subcontractors of this and yet the subcontractors turn up to continue installations . Connexin’s spokesperson clearly states above they have temporarily paused the planned installation of poles and yet what were the subcontractors doing this morning . Yes they do mention that they will cable the poles that they have already installed but it clearly states pausing of installation someone cannot communicate very well

    1. Avatar photo XGS says:

      I’m sure it wasn’t decided on a whim yesterday but still takes time to filter through and the statement was very clear that they will pause, not that they have.

      ‘While we enter into detailed negotiations with KCOM we *will* temporarily pause the planned installation of poles in parts of Hull and East Riding of Yorkshire.’

      Emphasis added. I appreciate it won’t change anything in the echo chamber and the campaign will collectively do its usual thing: MS3 and Connexin can do no right, KCom no wrong.

  8. Avatar photo FibreBubble says:

    Local MP Graham Stuart has quit as a minister today to concentrate on re-election. One thing that is on his mind is poles and I expect other MPs will also be putting more pressure on providers who are involved in the pole rush.

    1. Avatar photo XGS says:

      Think he’d be better off announcing he wants to see a strategic nuclear strike on Strasbourg and Brussels alongside asylum seekers being deported to Azkaban.

      https://www.electoralcalculus.co.uk/fcgi-bin/seatdetails.py?seat=Beverley+and+Holderness

  9. Avatar photo Carol says:

    These new providers have no intention of sharing KCOMS network, why would they? If they are up to sharing networks why are MS3 and Connexin not sharing each others instead of installing their own poles on the same streets. They’re just waiting for their big payday when they eventually go belly up and get bought out by KCOM/BT

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
200Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £24.99
145Mbps
Gift: £145 Reward Card
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £25.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £11.95
Contract: 12 Months
Data: 120GB
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £16.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.50
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £19.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
200Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £22.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £22.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon