Network Rail Shelves Plan to Privatise UK Fibre Optic Infrastructure
Network Rail appears to have shelved a plan that would have seen the national railway operator effectively privatise their large track-side fibre optic and data infrastructure, which carries all sorts of transport, video (CCTV etc.), signalling and others communications.
The operator has been looking at a solution to make more money from the infrastructure ever since they put in an application for Code Powers from Ofcom (here) in 2014, which revealed that they were planning to wholesale the network out to other ISPs and use it to boost Mobile coverage.
Earlier this year the wholesale proposal was followed by reports that Network Rail were mooting a more significant asset sale or joint venture, which apparently attracted a large amount of interest from potential investors (here). Now a new report from the FT confirms that the operator has “no immediate plans to progress” the privatisation.
The operator is said to have held talks with a number of major telecoms and broadband providers, which among others included Virgin Media and BT. Apparently BT was the front runner for some sort of Joint Venture or leased capacity arrangement, but in the end a mutually agreeable deal could not be reached and the talks stalled.
The Government are now rumoured to be keen for Network Rail to sell off some of their infrastructure in order to reduce its £42bn debit pile and as such we’ll probably be reporting on this again in the future. However Network Rail cannot simply hand over full control of its communications infrastructure to a new owner because they themselves still rely on it for various services, which complicates matters.
The other big question mark in all this is over how much Network Rail’s fibre optic cables would actually be worth to telecoms firms? The network tends to follow a very specific path and largely passes through areas that are already well served by a variety of other broadband and communications providers. Certainly there will be opportunities to be found, but equally it might not be worth as much as Network Rail would perhaps hope.
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, Google+, Facebook and Linkedin.
« Scientists Successfully Push Fibre Optic Transmissions Close to the Limit
Former O2 Boss Warns 5G Masts Could Swamp UK in Paper Work »
Comments are closed.
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Not a good idea to mix up safety-critical systems with the public internet. We don’t want malware interfering with signalling, or train drivers being distracted by spam advertising body enhacement products.
That isn’t how things work. 🙂
This has gone full circle – British Rail Telecoms was privatised in the early 90’s after having been Mercury’s backbone provider. That got sold to Racal and then Thales before being repurchased by Network Rail.
I don’t think there’s any suggestion that railway (data) traffic would be mixed with public traffic, they’d simply use the same ducts.
The significant problem with railway network assets (NR and LRT) is the level of training and the HR requirements to actually get your staff anywhere near your kit. Not only is there all the trackside safety training and kit involved, but you have to arrange random drug and alcohol testing for your approved staff, regardless of whether they’re working on or near the railway on any given day or week. You also run a reasonable risk of having your cables nicked by metal thieves, regardless of any actual metal content.