Home
 » ISP News, Tips and Guides » 
Sponsored Links

Coverage of Gigabit Broadband Nears 88 Percent of UK in H1 2025

Monday, Jun 30th, 2025 (12:01 am) - Score 1,120
UK-Map-with-Union-Jack-Marker-for-telecoms-123RF-187927761

ISPreview has this morning published our biannual H1 2025 summary of UK fixed broadband coverage, which reveals that “full fibre” (FTTP) ISP networks have grown to reach 78.06% of premises (up from 73.53% in H2 2024) and 87.84% are within reach of “gigabit” 1000Mbps+ speeds (up from 85.87%). Read on to see details for England, Wales, Scotland and N.Ireland…

Just to recap. All the new gigabit-capable (1000Mbps+ or 1Gbps+) network connectivity added during the first half of 2025 has come from Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) based networks via Openreach (BT), Nexfibre (Virgin Media), Hyperoptic, CityFibre, Netomnia (Brsk, YouFibre), KCOM, Gigaclear and many other alternative networks (Summary of UK Full Fibre Builds).

NOTE: Ofcom currently predicts (here) that gigabit coverage will reach between 97-98% by May 2027. The government’s £5bn Project Gigabit scheme also aims to help extend gigabit-capable broadband (1Gbps+ downloads) coverage “nationwide” (c.99% of premises) by 2032 (here).

The reason why “gigabit” coverage is currently still higher than “full fibre” (FTTP) is down to the millions of premises still covered by Virgin Media’s older Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC) network, which uses gigabit-capable DOCSIS 3.1 technology via a Hybrid Fibre Coax (HFC) network (there’s a lot of overbuild with FTTP in urban areas).

Advertisement

In addition, most of the progress on gigabit-capable builds seen during 2025 is still down to commercial investment (commercial builds have already delivered the first 80%+ of gigabit cover), often with only a little support from the Government’s various schemes. But the Project Gigabit scheme, and its subsidised rollout contracts with various different suppliers, are having an impact on this, albeit primarily via the hardest to reach premises (e.g. rural) that typically take longer to cover.

H1 2025 Broadband Coverage Figures

Listed below is the latest independent modelling from Thinkbroadband for late June 2025 (H1 – 2025). We should point out that the figure for ‘Under 10Mbps‘ doesn’t include any 4G mobile coverage (we only looked at fixed line services), which plays a part in the official Universal Service Obligation (USO) but isn’t included in TBB’s mapping. Sadly, it’s incredibly difficult to do an accurate model for mobile networks, especially in terms of a specific performance level.

NOTE: The figures in brackets (%) represent the previous H2 – 2024 result, as measured at the start of January 2025.

Fixed Broadband Network Availability H1 – 2025

Area 30Mbps+ Full Fibre Gigabit % Under 10Mbps
England 98.48% (98.42%) 78.24% (73.63%) 88.54% (86.66%) 0.51% (0.53%)
UK 98.32% (98.22%) 78.06% (73.53%) 87.84% (85.87%)
0.66% (0.70%)
Wales 97.61% (97.42%) 78.32% (73.13%) 81.50% (77.72%) 1.37% (1.43%)
Scotland 97.06% (96.73%) 70.20% (65.49%) 81.89% (79.62%) 1.65% (1.84%)
N.Ireland 98.73% (98.61%) 96.46% (96.06%) 96.84% (96.46%) 0.71% (0.76%)

NOTE: It’s very important to remember that Government / political coverage targets, like the previous “85%” for gigabit by 2025, reflect a national average – this can of course be better or worse for some areas (e.g. some counties may achieve higher coverage, while others could be below that).

Take note that each region (Scotland, Wales etc.) may also have its own policy and targets, which will feed into the central UK coverage figure. Furthermore, it’s worth highlighting how much of an impact newer alternative networks (altnets) are having on all this – excluding coverage by Openreach, KCOM (Hull) and Virgin Media.

Advertisement

Altnets were found to have covered 42.26% of the UK with FTTP by the end of H1 2025 (up from 39.38% in H2 2024). This breaks down as 44.56% in England (up from 41.50%), just 18.82% in Wales (up from 16.89%), 33.95% in Scotland (up from 32.05%) and 41.08% in Northern Ireland (up from 39.29%). But the overall coverage improvement delivered from this will be reduced due to overbuild between so many networks, particularly in urban areas.

As stated earlier, this data is a modelled estimate and should be taken with a pinch of salt, not least because it won’t always reflect the very latest real-world position. But it’s still one of the best and most up-to-date gauges that we have for checking against official claims (Ofcom’s own data tends to be several months behind that of TBB’s).

Solutions for Slow Broadband Areas

Finally, those still stuck in sub-10Mbps speed areas will, at least for now, be left with little option but to try harnessing the flawed 10Mbps Universal Service Obligation (USO) via BT (UK-wide) or KCOM (Hull-only). Many of those who have pursued the USO say they were offered a mobile broadband (4G or 5G) connection via EE, but those considered delivered under the USO itself usually get full fibre (FTTP) lines.

However, the reality is that some people will find they live in areas where not even the USO can cover the colossal upgrade costs of getting FTTP (here and here). The previous government was in the process of examining support options for remote premises and had also been preparing to review the broadband USO (here), which may bring some changes in the future (the Labour Party previously called for a 30Mbps USO).

Advertisement

Failing that, consumers could either try waiting to see if the problem gets resolved or consider exploring the option of a LEO satellite service (Starlink is good, if you can afford it and look past the ‘Musk’ factor). We would also recommend that consumers check via Three UK / Vodafone and O2 (VMO2) to see if any of those deliver better 4G or 5G mobile coverage than EE in your area (ideally by conducting your own tests, since official coverage maps are fairly useless) – see our guide to external antennas.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
3 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Lonpfrb says:

    “It’s very important to remember that Government / political coverage targets, like the previous “85%” for gigabit by 2025, reflect a national average – this can of course be better or worse for some areas”

    Project Giga#it still has no interest in rural Kent despite the taxes collected..

    1. Avatar photo Winston Smith says:

      Taxation isn’t restricted to rural Kent.

  2. Avatar photo SicOf says:

    Roll on covering the IV27 postcode, isn’t it stange how the big numbers are never caveated with holisic inclusive truths, just spining things to look good.
    How about the % of each UK postcode covered ‘included, then the % of post codes etc? Duplications of suppliers (national waste), the availability vs actual take ups, etc Oh might not look so ‘good’?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real persons legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £22.00 - 26.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £11.95
Contract: 12 Months
Data: 120GB
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £16.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £18.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Three UK ISP Logo
Three £20.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £22.00 - 26.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Beebu UK ISP Logo
Beebu £23.00
100 - 160Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon