» ISP News » 

New Report Reveals Ways to Cut the UK Rollout Cost of Full Fibre Broadband

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2017 (9:41 am) - Score 2,661

The Broadband Stakeholder Group, which is a think-tank for the UK Government, has published a new report from Analysys Mason that proposes a number of changes for making it easier and cheaper for telecoms operators to deploy ultrafast 5G Mobile and “full fibre” (FTTP/H) broadband networks.

Over the past few years we’ve seen the cost of deploying new telecoms infrastructure fall, which is largely due to new methods of civil engineering (e.g. narrow and micro trenching), as well as changes in related regulation and laws (e.g. Cost Reduction Directive and the Growth and Infrastructure Act 2013). Not forgetting the extra support from public funding and some relief from business rates (Budget 2017 summary)

As a result it’s now possible in some urban areas for operators’ like MS3 in Hull and Cityfibre / TalkTalk in York to bring down the cost of rolling out a new “full fibreFTTP/H broadband network to as little as £500 per premise passed (excludes the final connection into homes), while community-build providers like B4RN can often get around the hefty rural costs by asking local people to help build the network in exchange for shares.

Nevertheless issues with road traffic management, permit and notice schemes, section 58 notices and other planning related problems (e.g. wayleaves agreements for private land access) can all still conspire to delay deployments of new infrastructure or make them so expensive as to become economically unviable.

Richard Hooper, Chair of the BSG, said:

“Building infrastructure in the UK is extremely tough – due to our geography and legacy systems. But also due to regulation. We need to remove these barriers to ensure we get the digital infrastructure that our economy depends on.

On their own, these barriers can seem small but a multitude of marginal gains can add up to more than the sum of their parts. We believe that this is the case here. Removing these barriers will help unlock investment and deliver networks with better coverage, capacity and quality.”

The new report (PDF) proposes a series of recommendations for tackling some of the aforementioned issues, which if adopted could make life a lot easier for telecoms operators that wish to build new infrastructure and that in turn may help to attract more private investment towards such developments.

However it will be important to balance some of these proposals against the need to maintain a high standard of work and to avoid causing excessive disruption to local communities, although civil works will always be inherently fairly noisy and disruptive. Often that disruption is a small price to pay for ultrafast broadband and Mobile services.

Recommendations for the UK Government

Noticing and permit schemes

* Review the legislation and statutory guidance to introduce a more uniform national approach to managing road networks and street works which would result in a reduction in the number of, and the variations between, noticing and permit schemes operated by local authorities.

* Consider if introduction of additional mandatory requirements and guidance could help both operators and local authorities to better manage large-scale network deployments, where existing permit schemes
may not be suitable.

* Review permit scheme KPIs that are being monitored by highway authorities and analyse KPIs at a national level to understand the variation in statistics being reported and how the reporting is being used. For example, it may be appropriate for the National Street Gazetteer (NSG) scorecards for local authorities and other data in the NSG to be published. Consider an evaluation framework that also considers the outcomes from the street works activity, e.g. the benefits from full-fibre connections to customer premises.

Restriction (e.g. Section 58) notices

* Analyse the use of restriction notices by highway authorities in each nation to understand if there are noticeable differences between authorities in terms of volumes of notices, time periods applied and the number of works that do occur on roads with restriction notices in place. The aim would be to identify ways to introduce more flexibility (e.g. apply the Section 58 notice on part of a road, not the whole road).

Road traffic management

* Analyse the notice periods and fees being applied by highway authorities to road traffic management schemes such as temporary traffic regulation orders (TTROs), including conditions that are being applied by authorities such as parking bay occupation and parking fine exemptions, and the requirements for advertising.

Other findings

* Review micro-trenching and similar techniques of network deployment to understand why there are inconsistencies in how highway authorities assess the suitability of such techniques and make decisions that prevent their use, and update guidance accordingly.

A variety of other recommendations are also proposed for the highway authorities, such as reviewing permit fees for less strategically important streets (in theory some fees could be reduced to zero), adopting less stringent permit restrictions (in terms of timing, duration and hours of work) and reviewing reinstatement classifications with the aim being to reduce reinstatement costs etc.

On top of that the report also calls on telecoms operators to make some improvements, such as by introducing more detailed street works planning into their deployment planning processes and conducting more frequent site visits with highway authorities (lack of visits can cause delays to permits etc.).

Operators are also advised to adopt “improvement programmes” to enhance the quality of work by their subcontractors (covering all matters of street works). In keeping with that the BSG suggests that highway authorities should consider implementing incentives for operators and their subcontractors to deliver quality workmanship, which could include fixed penalty notices for poor-quality workmanship or fee reductions when delivering compliant first-time reinstatements.

Another key recommendation is one that calls for better communication, not least with members of the public who are often only given the most basic of information about local street works. This could include a need to review any “issues of confidentiality” that can hinder information sharing, although forcing this upon operators with a vested commercial interest in keeping such details private may be difficult.

Suffice to say that the full report is a mix of give and take for both sides, although it drops at a time when all of the politicians who might actually need to read it are currently being somewhat distracted by campaigning for next month’s General Election. Never the less it contains many useful points for discussion and hopefully won’t be overlooked by the fight for no.10.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
3 Responses
    1. Avatar CarlT says:


      If you could share with my neighbours and I how we are to JFDI going through public roads and pavements, lifting and digging beneath block paving, cutting through asphalt and concrete then reinstating to HAUC standards that’d be great.

      I’m pretty sure none of us have the required legal authority, permits or permissions to do this, let alone the required equipment. We’d have to hire contractors to carry out such work, precluding the possibility of JFDI.

      Most of us aren’t surrounded by fields and verges that are privately owned, cheap and easy to build through, and access to which can be traded for company shares or broadband access.

      JFDI is not an option for the overwhelming majority of the UK.

      Good opportunity to link up your business website though I guess.

    2. Avatar Steve Jones says:

      I would seem David Stamp’s recommendation is to just go ahead and dig up roads as you see fit without bothering with any of that annoying red tape. Presumably people should just turn up with picks and shovels.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Onestream £22.49 (*29.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £55 Reward Card
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2821)
  2. BT (2793)
  3. FTTC (1794)
  4. Building Digital UK (1760)
  5. Politics (1689)
  6. Openreach (1642)
  7. Business (1456)
  8. FTTH (1341)
  9. Statistics (1253)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1253)
  11. 4G (1079)
  12. Fibre Optic (1072)
  13. Wireless Internet (1036)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1028)
  15. Virgin Media (1020)
  16. EE (710)
  17. Vodafone (681)
  18. Sky Broadband (676)
  19. TalkTalk (674)
  20. 5G (536)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact