The Government’s Building Digital UK programme has begun a new consultation to help them identify what existing or planned commercial gigabit-capable broadband coverage exists in Cumbria (England), which will help to establish the areas where public investment may be needed to rollout the service.
At present the existing Connecting Cumbria (CC) project with Openreach (BT) has already helped to extend “superfast broadband” (24Mbps+) networks to around 95% of premises in Cumbria (i.e. 127,000 extra homes and businesses), but the focus is now turning to future gigabit (1000Mbps+) capable connections.
As part of this the Government has already pledged to invest £5bn on a new scheme – the UK Gigabit Programme (F20), which aims to ensure that at least 85%+ of UK premises can access a gigabit-capable connection by the end of 2025 (here). The effort for this will primarily be targeted at the final 20% of premises (i.e. the hardest to reach rural and some sub-urban areas), where commercial investment models tend to fail.
In England the new programme is intended to be much more centrally managed than the original Superfast Broadband (SFBB) programme and that explains why the consultation for Cumbria is being run by BDUK, rather than the county council. In any case the first step is in identifying precisely which areas are not currently expected to benefit from gigabit speeds under existing deployments, or any plans for the next 3 years.
According to the new consultation, which will be open to responses from the public and stakeholders until 9th March 2021, BDUK has so far identified a total of 143,864 premises (white areas – see map below) that may be in need of intervention under their programme. We can expect similar consultations like this to follow for other parts of England (how this scheme will work in Wales, Scotland and N.Ireland has yet to be decided).
Assuming all goes well, the new procurements for gigabit infrastructure – handled through a Dynamic Purchasing System (DPS) – should begin during the Spring 2021 (around April). The hope is that the first contracts under this could be awarded before the end of 2021, but such things can be complicated and we wouldn’t rule out some delays.
The Government have also forewarned (here) that they consider the “final 1%” of premises “could be prohibitively expensive to reach” via even their gigabit programme (this is the same sort of area as their 10Mbps USO was supposed to fix and that has suffered problems).
Anyone know if B4RN are going for this or even interested?
I recall them having an interest, but I also recall them having a large pipeline of voucher based deployments to finish off in the next year (i.e. they’ve got no shortage of work to do).
Why not finish the 4%-5% awaiting upgrades, using the monies owed, rather than overbuild most of what has been already subsidised?
Industry could then complete or compete to upgrade those on the more than 30Mbps where the benefits of incremental upgrades about 30Mbps to the state are less clear but should eventually provide operational cost savings to the operator.
Maybe there needs to be some planning coordination. A database of convenient aggregation points and proposed routes and nodes.
We should see the routes to these remote properties as a series of legs, with small access points at each turn.
If say Cadent are digging a mile of road for gas work, if this coincides with a proposed leg, they should be able to get a slice of funds to lay a section of empty plastic conduit, or hollow armoured tube. UU may be doing similar on a nearby leg when dealing with a water main. There would be fewer points to finally connect together to form a complete leg between properties and final network infrastructure. We also need more off the shelf conduit/ hollow armoured cable with standard joining devices available at builders merchants and more encouragement for property and land owners to bury at specified depth laying what they can on their own land, finishing with a node access box as close to the nearest proposed final road/route leg .
In the previous round BDUK already paid for the handover points and some ~900 fibre paths with spare tubing if not BT fibre to re-use. BT paid for ~300 commercially. There is also money owed to complete much of the in-fill – ~14k properties cannot access >30Mbps. The Public Accounts Committee were assured by the Perm Sec and BDUK these would have priority.