Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

New UK Gigabit Broadband Voucher Site Causes Headache for Suppliers

Saturday, Feb 18th, 2023 (7:35 am) - Score 6,912
Project-Gigabit-Funded-by-UK-Government

Network operators that are participating in the Government’s Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme (GBVS), which is overseen by the Building Digital UK (BDUK) agency, are complaining that a newly launched supplier portal has significantly increased the admin burden they face and allegedly suffered from serious security failings.

Just to recap. The UK voucher scheme generally offers grants worth up to £4,500 for rural homes and businesses to help them get a gigabit-capable broadband (1Gbps) service installed, which is available to areas with broadband speeds of “less than 100Mbps” – assuming there are also no near-term plans for a gigabit deployment in the same area (either via commercial or state aid supported builds). Some Local Authorities (LA) have also provided top-up funding to boost the voucher values, enabling them to reach some increasingly remote areas.

NOTE: The GBVS is currently being supported by an investment of £210m via the wider £5bn Project Gigabit programme.

Until recently, registered suppliers (broadband network operators) to this scheme needed to use a simplified WordPress (Content Management System) based platform to set-up projects and process vouchers, among other things. The old portal was far from ideal and there has long been calls for an improvement, although operators have otherwise learnt to deal with (or tolerate) its many quirks and annoyances.

However, BDUK recently introduced a new supplier portal (between December and January), which does away with the old system. But far from improving upon the old system, suppliers have instead been complaining to ISPreview.co.uk about its many shortcomings. As one official is claimed to have told suppliers, it was expressed as being a “minimum viable product” (i.e. lacking polish and key features).

Brief Summary of the Key Complaints

– Not user-friendly or intuitive (i.e. it’s overcomplicated vs the previously limited, but simple, WordPress based system).

– Significantly increases the admin workload for network operators (e.g. even simple stuff, like requesting a voucher, is much more complicated than before).

– Lack of adequate documentation from BDUK on API and other changes.

– Various bugs.

– Various security concerns, some of which appear to be significant.

Just to elaborate a bit on the issue of workload. Under the old WordPress system, suppliers would simply have to click request, enter a project and post code (address), fill in the customer details and it then displayed the voucher number. Easy enough.

By comparison, under the new system, you first have to find the project (listed by Project ID) – there’s no description column, so they end up clicking into lots of entries to find it – request the voucher, download a spreadsheet, fill in the columns, upload the spreadsheet, check eligibility (on every request), go through the info. again, verify it, submit it, and then you have to hunt for the voucher number it just generated in another screen (since the end of the process would otherwise just say “done“). It could be better.

As for the security concerns, there are several, but one stands out. For example, competing suppliers found they were able to access the confidential details of other operators by using the portal’s search tool in a certain way. BDUK has allegedly also been routinely sending out emails to suppliers using the unencrypted CC instead of encrypted BCC field, thus divulging employee contacts to other operators. The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) may well be getting some complaints.

A Government (DSIT) spokesperson said:

“This new platform for the Gigabit Broadband Voucher Scheme was recently improved and relaunched following feedback from suppliers and extensive user testing.

Any issues identified have now been resolved and BDUK will continue to refine the site, including further enhancements scheduled for the Spring.”

Naturally, it’s not uncommon to have teething problems when a new system is introduced, and it’s good to hear that BDUK may have already fixed many of the issues raised, although we’re not convinced they’ve resolved all of them (complaints were still coming in only two days ago). In any case, there’s clearly a bit more work left to do before the new system is able to gain a positive reaction from the majority of suppliers.

For its part, BDUK pointed out that all suppliers were offered training and supported to use the new platform when it launched (there was apparently extensive user testing with a group of suppliers pre-launch). The portal also makes it easier for the government to ensure an auditable, manageable and compliant process is followed, thus hopefully safeguarding taxpayers’ money and ensuring value for investment.

More than 114,000 vouchers have been issued so far under the GBVS and its previous iterations. To date, 84,000 of these vouchers have been used to connect premises to gigabit-capable broadband. Since the start of the year, more than 2,800 vouchers have been validated using the new portal, a thousand more than were validated in December 2022.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
15 Responses
  1. Avatar photo John says:

    Why “fix” what isn’t broken? – the question always ignored by the government

  2. Avatar photo Reality Bytes says:

    Wonder which Tory donor got the contract for this one?

    1. Avatar photo Gary says:

      Leftists: “everything bad the govt does is Tory!!” Ignoring everything bad done by other parties, currently commie Khan banning poor people from having cars or libdem/labour run Bath/Oxford going ahead with banning freedom of movement

      If the Tory party had control over ofcom then they wouldn’t have censored GB news Mark Steyn

    2. Avatar photo Reality Bytes says:

      If satire of the, vehemently pro-vaccine so likely pretty unhappy with Steyn, Tories triggers you so hard you feel the need to write a rant like that you’re the one with issues Gary/Abdullah/whomever.

      Spending less time on the darker side of social media is probably a good plan.

    3. Avatar photo Sam says:

      The usual no arguments > resort to personal attack from the “tolerant left”

    4. Avatar photo Reality Bytes says:

      I’m not sure which part of that it was satire is so hard to comprehend.

      If I wanted political debate I wouldn’t do it here, this is ISPReview not Twatter, but as you mentioned it the stuff about the Tories and Ofcom in his/your rant is clearly nonsense given the party as a whole is vehemently pro-vaccine, it’s one of their few successes, so would absolutely support Ofcom on that decision.

      The rest no idea about it but, yes, going on a rant like that due to that pretty tame comment does merit a suggestion to check yourself before you wreck yourself.

      Either way why not try and get political debate from people actually interested in places where people are interested. I’m sure you have your favourite echo chamber given your comment about the ‘tolerant left’. I’ve said far worse about Jeremy Corbyn by the way so pretty poor assumption that I’m ‘of the left’.

      Mental note: don’t make jokes about Tories it really triggers the snowflake right. Hey: if you guys can do it only fair I can too.

      Happy ranting and raving, triggerees.

    5. Avatar photo Sam says:

      Posts “Tory bad”

      Cries with walls of text because a user posted “other parties also bad”

      Wants censorship because the response to his political post is also political but he doesn’t like opposing views – 2023 leftists

  3. Avatar photo Gone Away says:

    I no longer want to read ISP Review. Not with the company of the idiots and conspiracy theorists who seem to have raken over the comments.

    1. Avatar photo Luke says:

      The comments are fun and insightful to read but if they trigger you so much that they put you off the article then stick to reading the guardian in paper form, that’s the soyboy media

    2. Avatar photo Reality Bytes says:

      Many of the comments are certainly fun to read but beyond as a study of when people escape their echo chamber and decide to share more widely probably not insightful, especially given the setting: a site devoted to broadband.

      These people are spreading Twitter into ISP Review. Twitter is cancer.

    3. Avatar photo John says:

      Interesting how you leftists turned against twitter after Elon removed censorship and stopped it from being an echo chamber, thus bursting your echo chambers

      Just because something isn’t on your echo chamber of propaganda legacy media outlet, does not make it a conspiracy. Anyone living in Oxford could tell you how many people were standing up against the authoritarian council. Twitter gives the people a voice. Legacy media owners ignore the people. You’ll be on the wrong side of history

    4. Avatar photo Ian says:

      There does seem to be a lack of moderation… need some help ISPreview?

    5. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      The catch is that people moaning about ‘Tory right’ this, ‘Labour left’ that are annoying in equal measure, but they aren’t strictly breaking the abuse rules. On the other hand, past a certain point it does become ‘off-topic trolling’ and that is against the rules. So, further posts like that in this article will be removed.

  4. Avatar photo Stu says:

    It would probably be more accurate to say that BCC’d recipients in emails are concealed, rather than encrypted.

    1. Avatar photo MilesT says:

      BCC: Omitted is even more accurate–the originating mail server (the first hop from thse application which submitted the email to be sent) will send out separate messages for every address on the BCC list, omitting the contents of the BCC on each field. That first mail server is usually “in the cloud” these days as a shared resource but the specific configuration is under the control of the originator (although dedicated, operated directly the originator is also fairly common it is becoming less so as it needs specialist skills to do properly and securely, even big organisations like WSP get it wrong when they try to do bulk emailing). Of course a better solution for “bulk” emailing is to hand it off to s service like Mailchimp (the paid for version , not the free one) as such services handles bounces and other noise, and messages are less likely to be swallowed up caught by recipient spam filters/mail sweepers.

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5538)
  2. BT (3518)
  3. Politics (2542)
  4. Openreach (2300)
  5. Business (2267)
  6. Building Digital UK (2247)
  7. FTTC (2045)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1978)
  9. Statistics (1790)
  10. 4G (1669)
  11. Virgin Media (1625)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1467)
  13. Fibre Optic (1396)
  14. Wireless Internet (1392)
  15. FTTH (1382)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon