Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 

Ofcom Investigates Multiple UK Broadband Networks Over Liability Funds UPDATE

Thursday, Jul 16th, 2026 (3:50 pm) - Score 1,680
fibre optic broadband for the home

The UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has opened investigations into several alternative full fibre broadband networks (altnets) – including Internetty, Cambridge Fibre Networks, Optical Fibre Infrastructure, Pine Media and Trooli – after they found “reasonable grounds to believe” that they may not be meeting their duties to show they have secured funds for meeting their liabilities.

Under Regulation 16 of the Electronic Communications Code (ECC), network operators with Code Powers have a legal obligation to provide the regulator with documents each year – on 1st April – confirming that they have sufficient funds to meet certain liabilities (details). These liabilities include for fixing damage caused by the installation or removal of electronic communications apparatus on streets and roads.

NOTE: Code Powers are typically sought from the regulator in order to help speed-up deployments of new fibre networks and cut costs, not least by reducing the number of licences needed for street works. The powers can also help with supporting access to run new fibre via Openreach’s (BT) existing cable ducts and poles (PIA).

The funds act as an insurance so that, in the event of the code operator falling into administration or ceasing to trade, there are sufficient funds available to remedy any works the operator was carrying out when using its Code Powers (e.g. digging up roads to lay its telecoms network). “This helps ensure that the public is not left having to pay for such works,” said Ofcom.

Advertisement

Regular readers will appreciate that this rule has become much more important in recent years as network builders have come under increasing pressure from rising build costs, high interest rates and competition. “Given how quickly the market is changing, ensuring that Code Operators are securing the right funds is more important than ever before,” added Ofcom.

Suffice to say that, in keeping with this, the regulator has launched several investigations against network operators including Internetty Limited (here), Cambridge Fibre Networks (here), Optical Fibre Infrastructure Limited (here), Pine Media Limited (here) and Trooli Limited  + Trooli Thistle Limited (here) after finding “reasonable grounds to believe” that they may not be meeting their duties to show they have secured the necessary liability funds.

In addition, Ofcom has also opened a wider enforcement programme to monitor if providers are meeting their duties to show they have secured funds for meeting their liabilities. The regulator added that they would be “engaging with other operators who we are concerned may not be complying fully with their obligations” (i.e. more investigations may soon follow).

Ofcom Statement

We expect this programme to run for several months, during which time we may decide to open additional formal investigations if we consider it would be appropriate to do so. We expect to publish updates on progress at relevant points over this period.

Whilst no formal obligation exists on operators, we would encourage operators who have not yet exercised their code powers to update Ofcom accordingly, so such operators are not subject to potential enforcement action.

In terms of enforcement, we suspect that the most likely outcome at this stage, if any operators are indeed found to have failed in their duties, is for Ofcom to levy a financial penalty and / or require that the operators correct their mistake as soon as possible (i.e. making sure they have adequate funds and submission of the necessary certificates).

Advertisement

In theory, the regulator could also revoke a network operator’s Code Powers, although that would be extremely disruptive (including to third-party contractors) and is likely to be viewed as a last result. We’ve not previously seen investigations like this one take place and so have no base of comparison for how long they will run, but we imagine it should be fairly easy for Ofcom to identify who is or is not compliant.

UPDATE 17th July 2026 @ 12:24pm

We’ve had a statement come in from Internetty.

Statement from Internetty

InternetTY is aware of Ofcom’s announcement regarding an investigation into compliance with Regulation 16 of the Electronic Communications Code (ECC).

InternetTY has, and continues to have, the required financial arrangements and liability cover in place to meet its obligations under the ECC. We also provided Ofcom with the relevant information and supporting documentation during the previous reporting period.

Following receipt of Ofcom’s correspondence, we have responded to the regulator to raise our concerns regarding the basis of the investigation and the wording of the notification, as we believe it does not accurately reflect our compliance position.

We will continue to engage constructively with Ofcom and provide any further information they require. We remain confident that Internetty has the appropriate funds and certificates in place to meet its obligations, and we are committed to maintaining full compliance with all regulatory requirements.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
4 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Ed Morton says:

    ‘…they may not be meeting their duties to show they have secured funds for meeting their liabilities.’

    You mean a significant part (if not all) of the AltNet sector might be a financial basketcase? I’m shocked to learn that. Shocked I tell you.

  2. Avatar photo Big Dave says:

    Certainly don’t want any remedial works falling back on to Openreach. No doubt we will all end up paying then.

  3. Avatar photo Luke says:

    If you’re a Code Power Operator and need support calculating your liability funds, the team at Trenches Law is always happy to help. For more information, visit https://trencheslaw.co.uk or contact us at [email protected]

  4. Avatar photo SicOf says:

    Cost increases due to competetion ? In the great privatisation spin isnt competetion supposed to lower prices…
    Maybe a regulator should be checking the viability of the fragnet of infrastructure duplication and implementors by licencenging and taking some accountability as prevention and good practice rather than retrospective quizzling, and ‘blaming’ others (that it’s supposed to be regulating) !

    Regulator fit for purpose ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £22.99
145Mbps
Gift: £165 Reward Card
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £23.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
BT UK ISP Logo
BT £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: £100 BT Reward Card
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
giffgaff UK ISP Logo
giffgaff £14.00
Contract: 18 Months
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £15.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £21.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift: £30 Gift Card
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Grain Connect UK ISP Logo
250Mbps
Gift: £25 Bill Credit
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact