Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Gigaclear Call for Openreach Changes to Bring Gigabit Broadband to UK Rural Areas

Monday, Nov 10th, 2025 (8:47 am) - Score 1,400
gigaclear engineers in rural uk field

Abingdon-based alternative broadband ISP Gigaclear, which has built a full fibre (FTTP) network across 612,000 premises in rural parts of England (inc. 160,000 customers), has responded to Openreach’s recent threat to scale-back their own fibre roll-out (here) by calling for “fair regulation between the incumbent and altnets to level the playing field“.

Just to recap. Last week saw Openreach’s CEO, Clive Selley, warn both the Government and Ofcom that he was “going to hold fire” on seeking approval for the final phase of the operator’s plan to go beyond their current 25 million premises target for December 2026 (i.e. the goal to expand FTTP up to 30 million premises by 2030); at least until the regulatory and tax environment showed themselves to be favourable.

NOTE: Gigaclear is principally owned by Infracapital, together with Equitix and Railpen. The company previously had investment commitments estimated to be worth up to around £1.1bn (here) and in late 2023 secured a £1.5bn debt facility (here). The provider holds several Project Gigabit build contracts in Oxfordshire (here) and East Gloucestershire (here).

At this stage, it’s not known whether Openreach will actually scale-back their infrastructure deployment plans. But Selley’s warning was clearly issued with a view to the threat from both rising business rates and Ofcom’s forthcoming market review (i.e. the desire for softer regulation given today’s more competitive environment). However, any reduction in their deployment would naturally hit rural areas the hardest, since those are often the last to benefit from such upgrades.

Advertisement

The CEO of rival provider Gigaclear, Nathan Rundle, has now hit back and warned that the digital divide between rural and urban areas was now at risk of widening “significantly without greater collaboration across the industry“.

Gigaclear CEO, Nathan Rundle, said:

“We have already made substantial headway in bringing full-fibre connectivity to rural homes and businesses that otherwise would have been forgotten – but the job is not done and we will continue to champion the need for greater collaboration and a level playing field that will help ensure the regulatory environment remains attractive for investors. This is how we will connect these hard-to-reach rural homes and businesses and support the Government in reaching their 2032 target of achieving nationwide gigabit coverage for 99% of properties.”

Gigaclear has been providing ultrafast full fibre broadband to the hardest to reach rural areas for the last 15 years, with over 600,000 homes and businesses able to access our network and serving over 160,000 customers. This includes many Building Digital UK communities in hard to reach areas, some of which are currently in progress, in Oxfordshire and Gloucestershire. What these underserved rural communities need now is constructive collaboration between the regulator, the incumbent and altnets.”

The caveat is that some of what they’re seeking naturally reflects Gigaclear’s own vested interests. The provider is calling upon Ofcom and Openreach to use mechanisms enabled by the Communications Act 2003 (Sections 93A & 93B) to bring about “meaningful digital transformation in rural areas … by enabling altnets to collaborate with incumbents, rather than being sidelined, the rollout can be accelerated, and duplication minimised“.

As highlighted in their Telecoms Access Review (TAR) 2026-2031 consultation response, Gigaclear again urges the regulator and industry to level the playing field and focus on:

  • Recognition of altnet coverage in determining when copper switch-off (stop-sell) can be triggered for incumbents, ensuring we assess full-fibre progress collectively, not just by one provider.
  • Prioritisation of the hardest-to-reach rural geographies (Area 3), with a co-ordinated framework where Openreach agrees not to over-build in those zones for a defined period, giving altnets the chance to serve customers without duplication. This is important as many rural areas cannot support multiple competing FTTP networks. Without a clear regulatory framework the investment case is damaged and inconsistent statements from the incumbent only add to this. 
  • PIA Pricing – Gigaclear stand ready to work with the Government, the Regulator and the Incumbent on this area. Gigaclear highlight that whilst altnets can make use of existing infrastructure through Openreach’s PIA products, evidence suggests that PIA users make a disproportionately large contribution towards covering the cost of Openreach’s passive infrastructure. We would encourage all stakeholders to support the case for a more level playing field – one that would promote collaboration and lead to a sustainable relationship between the incumbent and altnet providers.

Gigaclear itself currently holds an aspiration to extend their network coverage to 1 million premises, although like other operators they’ve recently had to scale-back their own build plans and cut jobs, due to the pressures from high interest rates, rising build costs and a highly competitive environment (here and here).

Advertisement

Suffice to say that anything which might give them extra protection is something that investors would no doubt welcome, albeit while potentially inhibiting Openreach’s natural competitive flexibility to build where they want with their own money. Once again, Ofcom will have a difficult balancing act to perform.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
6 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Jonny says:

    They’re asking for lower PIA pricing as well as Openreach being blocked from using their own assets to deploy network if it’s going to overbuild an altnet. This request should be laughed out of the room.

    If you want to regulate this hard then nationalise the network, stop thinking that there’s a level of pain that can be inflicted on BT that will suddenly make many of these other networks profitable.

  2. Avatar photo Meadmodj says:

    Openreach are awaiting the outcome of the TAR before committing their plans.

    BT/EE are gearing for rural alternatives such as 5G and Starlink.

    The OR infrastructure has to be paid for and existing costs should be be shared equally between fibres. If anything PIA costs should go up and in my view VM and Altnets obligated to open their ducts.

    Has Gigaclear ever approached BT/EE with a equitable wholesale option?.

  3. Avatar photo FANNY ADAMS says:

    Much is in Gigaclear’s clear own commercial interest but I do agree with this bit:

    “…evidence suggests that PIA users make a disproportionately large contribution towards covering the cost of Openreach’s passive infrastructure.”

    and this makes sense where BT have given a USO ADSL connection of 10mbps OR 4G/5G dongle:

    “Prioritisation of the hardest-to-reach rural geographies (Area 3), with a co-ordinated framework where Openreach agrees not to over-build in those zones for a defined period, giving altnets the chance to serve customers without duplication.”

    If the above is not a rule, BT will suddenly find money to try and barge out ALTNETS after making it clear for months or years those properties were too expensive for it….

    1. Avatar photo The real Witcher says:

      “BT will suddenly find money to try and barge out ALTNETS after making it clear for months or years those properties were too expensive for it….”
      Does an altnet appearing and taking existing existing customers not change the economic viability of an area? After all, that is what drove Openreach into the original fibre build when digital region looked like they were going to take a huge chunk of their user base and openreach feared it would be replicated across the country – much like alnets now

  4. Avatar photo Diver Fred says:

    I’ve commented previously I have experience that GigaClear Cherry Pick in rural areas. One of the families neighbours, at the end of a cable, but in a group of 5 residences is ready to sign up with who ever provides fibre first; they even put a request in to GC when they first came to the village to be connected but GC having planned to go to the serving pole of the 5 properties never did. Presently they BT at the end of a ‘bit of wet string’ (technical term for poor connection) and Starlink but they want/need the reliability of fibre. A second family in the group also want, need fibre from anyone.
    I don’t think GC should complain when they can’t be bothered to reach all properties in an area.

    1. Avatar photo Ben says:

      Gigaclear are a commercial business, they’re under no obligation to serve everyone. Only BT and KCOM have a Universal Service Obligation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real persons legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £22.99
132Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £23.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £24.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £8.50 - 17.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £18.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
O2 UK ISP Logo
O2 £21.24
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £18.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Lightning Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £22.99
132Mbps
Gift: First 3 Months Free
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon