
The Government’s Building Digital UK agency has today published the latest Q2 – Q3 2025 progress report on their £5bn Project Gigabit broadband rollout scheme. The data reveals that some 1.3 million premises have now received coverage from BDUK’s gigabit programmes since their inception, albeit only 131,090 via Project Gigabit’s contracts.
At present over 88% of UK premises can already access a 1000Mbps+ capable broadband network (here) and Ofcom separately forecasts that this could rise to between 91-97% of homes by January 2028 (here). Most of this has been delivered by commercial deployments (predominantly focused on urban and semi-urban areas), but there are some areas in the final 10-20% of premises that are simply too expensive for commercial providers.
Project Gigabit itself was originally established in 2021 to help extend broadband ISP networks capable of delivering download speeds of at least 1000Mbps (1Gbps) to achieve “nationwide” coverage (c.99%) by 2030 2032 (here) – focusing on the commercially unviable areas (usually rural and semi-rural locations). The project has already committed most of its budget up to 2030, but there are still some contracts yet to be awarded and others that have been scaled-back or switched suppliers (here, here, here and here).
Advertisement
The latest update builds on BDUK’s prior report and covers the wider period between 1st April 2025 and 30th September 2025, although it should be noted that the agency tends to publish a separate and more regular monthly update in order to cover the progress of individual contracts under the Project Gigabit scheme (here). Today’s report is thus more of a general overall progress update, without any individual contract specifics.
Of the premises delivered by BDUK between 1st April 2025 and 30th September 2025 (Q2-Q3 only):
The spreadsheet also includes some additional data and a regional breakdown of the figures, some of which we’ve included below. One key things to note below is that Project Gigabit itself has still only delivered a relatively small amount of gigabit coverage, with the earlier ‘Superfast Broadband Programme‘ (SFBB) still holding the lion’s share (largely because that has run for many years longer).
Gigabit Premises passed by year and BDUK intervention
Advertisement
| BDUK intervention | Total to 30 September 2025 | 1 April 2025 to 30 September 2025 |
| GIS (Gigabit contracts) | 131,090 | 57,210 |
| Hubs | 5,670 | 90 |
| Superfast (SFBB) | 801,840 | 8,500 |
| Vouchers (premises passed) | 368,630 | 14,460 |
| of which counted premises | 252,310 | 12,910 |
| of which calculated using a multiplier on connected vouchers | 116,330 | 1,550 |
| Total | 1,307,200 | 80,300 |
| Vouchers connected | 156,540 | 10,070 |
Gigabit Premises Passed by Year, Country and Region
| Country/Region | Overall Total to 30 Sept 2025 | 1 April 2025 to 30 Sept 2025 |
| England | 915,400 | 61,700 |
| North East | 34,700 | 2,200 |
| North West | 76,400 | 10,300 |
| Yorkshire and The Humber | 96,500 | 11,400 |
| East Midlands | 93,600 | 4,400 |
| West Midlands | 94,300 | 5,200 |
| East of England | 164,100 | 6,700 |
| London | 9,200 | 0 |
| South East | 170,400 | 11,300 |
| South West | 176,200 | 10,200 |
| Wales | 128,500 | 5,700 |
| Scotland | 134,700 | 11,300 |
| Northern Ireland | 128,600 | 1,400 |
| United Kingdom | 1,307,200 | 80,300 |
Finally, BDUK said they were also investigating their vouchers data quality, which may be resulting in a small underestimate of vouchers delivered.
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real persons legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.