
The UK Government’s Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves, has today delivered her 2025 Spending Review, which included a few bits of new information and updated figures for telecoms. But as well as confirming £1.9bn for broadband and mobile projects (existing commitments), it also appeared to reflect a delay to the gigabit broadband roll-out from 2030 to 2032.
The latest Spending Review sets out the planned day-to-day spending totals for all government departments for the years from 2026/27 to 2028/29, and investment spending plans for a further year (from 2026/27 to 2029/30). This covers all the spending that can reasonably be planned in advance, making up about 40% of all public spending (the remaining spending is usually driven by demand that can’t be planned, such as benefits).
The UK telecoms industry will be keeping a close eye on the latest review, not least for any potential dilution in terms of the government’s commitment toward fixed broadband and mobile networks. The previous Autumn 2024 Budget already committed “over £500m of funding next year” for “improving reliable fast broadband and mobile coverage across our country, including in rural areas“, but the Spending Review covers a wider period.
Advertisement
However, over the past few months we’ve also seen talk about the government potentially cutting some of the c.£2bn that remained unspent within their £5bn Project Gigabit broadband roll-out scheme (i.e. expanding gigabit-capable broadband “nationwide” (c.99% of the UK) by 2030), as well as potentially also reducing their £501m commitment to the £1bn industry-led Shared Rural Network (SRN) project that is expanding 4G mobile coverage into rural areas.
Speaking of which, mobile operators have also been pressing the government for changes in annual licence fees, planning and other areas to help boost 4G and 5G deployments (here). But much of that is perhaps more of a focus for the forthcoming Infrastructure Strategy than this review.
Overall, there isn’t a lot of detail on broadband and mobile matters in the full Spending Review 2025 Document, but this did stick out.
Spending Review Statement on Broadband and Mobile
The SR provides £1.9 billion over the SR period [2026/27 to 2029/30] for Building Digital UK (BDUK) to deliver the next phase in the transformation of the country’s digital infrastructure. This includes:
➤ Connecting more homes and businesses to gigabit-capable broadband to reach 99% of UK premises by 2032. BDUK will focus delivery in this SR period on achieving greater coverage in Scotland and Wales, and refresh delivery plans ahead of the Spending Review 2027; and
➤ Working with industry to deliver the Shared Rural Network so the most remote areas have 4G coverage.
This settlement provides up to £1.9 billion over the SR period to deliver a modern digital government. This includes the rollout of new products and services such as the GOV.UK Wallet and App, and productivity-enhancing AI tools across the public sector, and replacing legacy systems.
Ofcom currently forecasts that gigabit-capable broadband should reach around 97-98% of UK premises by May 2027 (here) and so the reality here is that the country should still get very close to that 99% figure by 2030. On the other hand, Project Gigabit, which is focused on upgrading the hardest-to-reach areas (often remote rural locations) has recently suffered a number of contract failures as alternative networks pulled out.
Advertisement
For example, alternative network operator FullFibre Limited recently “mutually agreed to terminate” their Project Gigabit broadband roll-out contracts for the Derbyshire Peak District and Herefordshire area (here), which came after Voneus did the same for Mid West Shropshire (here) and Freedom Fibre followed for Cheshire (here).
The losses aren’t huge, but they do help to underline the wider challenges in today’s market (i.e. higher build costs, high interest rates, competition etc.), which could make tackling that final 1-2% of premises even more of a challenge – one that it seems will now take a couple of years longer than previously planned to resolve. On the flip side, it’s positive that the government has finally confirmed a solid funding pledge to tackle this area.
UPDATE 1:57pm
The first comment has just come in.
Advertisement
Till Sommer, Head of Policy, ISPA UK, said:
“The rollout of gigabit broadband is one of the largest infrastructure projects of its generation, funded overwhelmingly by industry. With 86% of homes now able to access gigabit speeds, we’re at a critical juncture with rollout. The remaining 14% are the most challenging to connect, and this is exactly where Project Gigabit funding matters most to deliver on a new government target of 99% gigabit-capable broadband to UK premises by 2032.
We welcome the £1.9 billion committed over this Spending Review period, which will be important in fuelling the Government’s growth agenda, with digital connectivity providing the backbone of the growth areas in the Government’s Industrial Strategy.
Equally, we urge the Government to double down on efforts to reduce barriers to rollout, to ensure that additional funding is translated into connectivity gains as soon as possible. Clear, consistent support for Project Gigabit is essential if we are to finish the job and ensure no community is left behind in the UK’s digital future.”
UPDATE 12th June 2025 @ 8:34am
CityFibre sent in a response yesterday too.
A CityFibre spokesperson said:
“As a significant partner on Project Gigabit, we’re working hard to bring full fibre connectivity to 1.3 million premises which, otherwise, would have missed out. Work is underway in all nine of the areas where we’ve been awarded contracts and, whilst there is much work to be done, we welcome the ongoing commitment to Project Gigabit and the real benefits it will bring.”

If you want to grow an economy, pushing back infrastructure targets probably isn’t the wisest move.
All the studies show that bringing Gigabit to an area is a net positive. The build generates jobs, the connections allow isolated rural areas to work remotely for companies worldwide, etc.
True, but the main ISP’s Trolls want to keep the UK backwards… serving whom???
@No-name: Adjusting the target will make negligible impact given it affects less than 1pc of potential customers and they are highly unlikely to be making a significant contribution to the economy.
Broadband is indeed important
Also it is not the job of government. They are actually making it worse with all the tax hikes
Great
Gonna be stuck with 3.5mbps down 0.6mps up forever
I did briefly appear on Openreach’s full fibre rollout by the end of 2026 a few months ago, but that has now been removed
Despite a brand new fibre cable being installed on my street poles, right past my front door to connect a new large business premises being built a few fields away
And don’t give me 4G, it runs at about 7mbps during the evenings, with absolutely unusable latency, jitter & dropped packets
There is a lot to be covered by that funding. It is best to wait to see how it is allocated amongst the deputy ministers. For instance the Government Wallet is a big ticket item.
Or..BDUK directors get another 2 years wages!
Living within Lot17 (Cheshire) I am getting frustrated by the government putting more barriers in the way of expanding Gigabit rollout. My belief is that Freedom Fibre quite possibly pulled out because of the hike in Employer’s National Insurance from April 2025.
Pretty much the opposite is true. Freedom Fibre pulled out of government subsidised contracts due to their dire finances.
I suspect Fibre Heroes/Full Fibre Ltd may have pulled out of Lot 15 and the Peak District lot for much the same reason (though merger costs may also have impacted their decision).
The median UK salary is ~£37,400 currently (I wish!). Prior to the April NI adjustments (from 13.8% to 15% and a change in threshold from £9,100 to £5,000) the annual amount due in employers NI would have been ~£3900. After April it will be ~£4860. This equates to an increase in employee wage costs of close to 25%.
A company paying the national minimum wage for an employee working a 40 hour week (£23,795) would have paid £2,028 before April, and this will increase to £2,819 after April 2025. An increase of close to 40% in employee wage costs.
I’ve said it before (on here I think), a change from 13.8% to 15% might not seem much, but it is not a 1.2% increase: it’s a 1.2 pp increase, or an 8.7% increase (and then add in the threshold change costs). This is why employers were aghast when the announcement was made last year.
So, when the average profit margin for UK businesses is around the 5% mark – less for some (e.g. retail may work at ~3-4%), more for others (e.g. services at ~10-15%) – it’s not hard to see what this effect would have on companies working on small profit margins or altnets (generally running an operating loss I believe… until premises passed become premises signed up) signing Gigabit UK contracts prior to 2024’s autumn budget.
And on Freedom Fibre, they doubled their revenue for the year 2023/24, but their operating losses did increase by over 25% in the same period, driven by capital expenditure (debt financing) on expanding their network infrastructure. In that respect I would imagine they are little different than most other altnets and will be ripe for picking at some point.
Once again the Labour government proving they do not have a clue. Can’t wait for the next election, that’s for sure.
So really “sad” to see the main ISP’s Trolls in panic mode. As the alt nets are slowly but surely making a big difference to the digital future of the UK. All looking good as the main ISP’s are losing so many customers. As by quoting a percentage (which source – unproven) and are desperate!!
The big ISPs dominate the market. The smaller ISPs typically hold less than 1pc market share. The figures are there for all to see.