Openreach Publish UK Pilot Pricing for FTTP Broadband Speeds to 8500Mbps
National network operator Openreach (BT) has this afternoon published pricing details for their forthcoming pilot of XGS-PON based Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) home broadband ISP lines, which now includes the 5.5Gbps (550Mbps upload) and 8.5Gbps (850Mbps upload) tiers. The launch date for the pilot has also been put back slightly from 1st to 23rd March 2026.
As previously reported (here, here, here, here and here), Openreach are currently in the final stages of preparing to launch their first customer pilot of faster 10Gbps capable XGS-PON based full fibre technology with UK broadband ISPs (Passive Optical Network – the ‘X’ stands for 10, the ‘G’ for Gigabits’ and the ‘S’ for Symmetric speed). EE (BT) are currently the only retail ISP to have confirmed their involvement.
The new technology, which many of Openreach’s rivals are already using, will go beyond today’s top download speeds of 1.8Gbps on their GPON full fibre network and push up to 8.5Gbps. But until today the initial pilot announcement had so far only provided pricing details for symmetric speeds of up to 3.3Gbps.
Advertisement
The latest briefing adds pricing details for their two fastest consumer focused download tiers – 5.5Gbps (550Mbps upload) and 8.5Gbps (850Mbps upload). Take note that they will also offer a symmetric speed variety of these tiers, although that’s likely to cost extra and be targeted at premium (business) connections. The briefing also confirms changes to pilot connection charges applicable from 1st April 2026.
Openreach XGS-PON Pilot Pricing
| Connection charges, excl. VAT (All bandwidths) | Pilot Charge Operative: 23/03/2026 – 31/03/2026 |
Pilot Charge Operative: 01/04/2026 |
| Standard Connection | £122.84 | £127.26 |
| Premium Connection | £152.84 | £158.34 |
| Advanced Connection | £297.84 | £308.56 |
| Standard Connection – XGS Box Swap | £0.00 | £0.00 |
| Proactive FTTP Upgrades – Standard Connection | £0.00 | £0.00 |
| Proactive FTTP Upgrades – Premium Connection | £30.00 | £31.08 |
| Proactive FTTP Upgrades – Advanced Connection | £175.00 | £181.30 |
Rental Charges
| XGS-PON Pilot (annual rental) | Pilot Charge Operative: 23/03/2026 – 31/03/2026 |
Pilot Charge Operative: 01/04/2026 |
| Up to 3300/330 Mbit/s | £324.00 | £324.00 |
| Up to 3300/3300 Mbit/s | £360.00 | £360.00 |
| Up to 5500/550 Mbit/s | £420.00 | £420.00 |
| Up to 8500/850 Mbit/s | £480.00 | £480.00 |
Readers should remember that Openreach’s pricing only reflects the wholesale cost of the line, while retail ISPs still have to add all sorts of extra costs on top before getting to the price you pay (e.g. 20% VAT, network/service features, general costs/support, profit margin etc.). Existing FTTP customers taking one of these new tiers will also require another engineer visit to install a 10Gbps capable Optical Network Terminal (ONT).
Advertisement
Openreach has previously informed ISPreview that their pilot would initially begin across an area of 40,000 premises in Guildford, although this could still be expanded. The classic catch with packages this fast is that most consumers would struggle to fully harness those top speeds, usually due to various Wi-Fi/device limits and any limitations of the online servers you’re connecting to (Why Buying Gigabit Broadband Doesn’t Always Deliver).
One other issue to consider is that it often takes time for retail broadband providers and their suppliers to upgrade their network capacity in order to support such tiers, so even once launched (commercially) it may be a while before adoption improves. Finally, pilot pricing and product details should always be considered tentative (subject to change).
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and Linkedin.
« Starlink Prep Second Generation Direct-to-Cell 5G Mobile Satellites for 2027
Advertisement
Leave a Reply
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Still up to their old tricks of cake slicing tiers, making upload speeds expensive. The sweet smelling FTTP ALTNETS however, are mostly symmetric by default and considerably cheaper. I mean 5.5gbps with 500mbps upload is laughable.
Hoping for ALTNET consolidation into one or two ALTNETS, that BT and Vermin Media don’t get their hands on, as these other milking machines need customer loss once their new roll-out come to a natural end and then stops hiding churn.
Yeah but how many of these fabled AltNets will be around in a couple of years time??
Could ask the same for BT and Vermin. BT pensions and debt mean they have had to dump/sell other parts of the business, and predatory investors have circled before, then Vermin has a huge debt pile, which, as reported on here caused a strategic rethink of Nexfibre deliverables, along with outsourcing of their staff.
The two well established telecoms are not immune as they still have their own issues. Once there is a big national ALTNET, with good footprint and likes of Sky taking up their network, as well as word of mouth that speeds are faster and cheaper, often with no in-contract price increases, then things may start to look very different.
One of the reasons i’d avoid a smaller Altnet is after storm damage it can take weeks to get reconnected, whereas Openreach are far bigger and can recover quickly. During the storms last year some Fibrus customers were still not reconnected for several weeks as they didnt have the staff. My fibre cables were dug up accidentally during roadworks, so BT sent me a 4g backup solution and had Openreach to replace the cables within a couple of days (and it was over the weekend when it happened). So Altnets are not for me.
Symmetrical 3300 is £360 annual divide that into 12 months £30 add £10 or £20
There’s the real price in pilot pricing not bad if the real prices are this way
One difference with Altnets is they only serve a handful of people. So they’re utterly irrelevant.
@fanny adams
one national altnet is not the way to go. you need balance.
you don’t want it swamped with altnets like you have now, nor saturated to just 1 network.
if you had just one network, innovation would stifle, and prices would be high.
@Benjamin, we had one national network for far too many years, well, most of us anyway, there were those who had Virgin.
I am glad we have more choice, but I agree, I would not want one national altnet6, unless it was a non-profit-making company.
@Notomania The altnets collectively cover quite a lot of the country now. And let’s be honest there is no way whatsoever Openreach would be bringing in packages like this if not for the altnet competition. I get the view most people are not interested in these multi-gig symmetrical packages but there is a decent minority that are. Even if it were only 5%-10% that’s still hundreds of millions if not billions in revenue up for grabs. So altnets are not irrelevant, even if they’re not in your area, because they are forcing Openreach to keep moving instead of collecting monopoly profits.
At those prices and shocking upload speeds, how do they expect to be able to compete with competitors.
Openreach are making the same mistakes that got them is a huge mess to begin with, trying to please shareholders in this way damages the business.
What mess is that?
Just want to point out that nobody on a domestic package needs those speeds to be symmetrical. Nobody.
Respectfully [shhhh] about what people need and don’t need
It comes back to the ignorance that because you don’t need it, then no one else needs it. You need to understand that people are free to spend their money how they like, and ultimately, some people have large family households with heavy users, not just for 1 person to a single device
I doubt they are for domestic use, but no doubt there will be some people who have more money than sense and will get it just because they can. Like people going to 1Gb/s and more and never make full use of it. I saved my brother money by getting him to lower the speed he was on, because it was a waste of money paying for 500Mb/s when he was not using anywhere near it
Up to people at the end of the day, but I do know of some people who gets fast speeds just to say they have it, like someone I knew who used to buy expensive phones, just to show off really.
Point is dear Ed, that just because YOU do not have a requirement does not mean others don’t.
For example, syncing your media and photos to the cloud or your own off site server, maybe people work in media and need to upload and download media projects (they can be big, as not compressed). Many other uses too, like multiple people doing stuff at same time (4K streaming, uploading etc).
And lastly Ed, for those that can, why pick an inferior service that is asymmteric at a more expensive price, than a faster speed with an ALTNET at a cheaper price that is symmetric.
Trot along….
Well, lets for a min forget about people actually “needing” such speed (people wishing to “home game” for example) you seem to be forgetting the other side of the coin, Want! IMO No one “needs” a Ferrari or even a VM Golf GTI, but plently enough people WANT them. Sure (at least for the moment) these are niche speeds but that doesn’t mean there shouldn’t be a market for such packages avalable to the public.
I remember when people used to say “no one needs 512k broadband”, and at the time it wasn’t a “need” but you could be dam sure such connections were coveted by us broke college kids still stuck on dial up.
People don’t need to own Ferraris or Bugattis either but they are available for those who want them.
There’s always one 640K’er.
Laughs in youfibre.
Yup – £99 all in.
The pilot pricing is to try to get some ISPs to take part – otherwise, for a tiny footprint in Guildford, it’s not worth their while.
1G/1G is available in some BDUK type C areas already, but as it’s priced at £1,243.20 + VAT per year (from 1st April) I don’t see ISPs beating down the doors to offer it. Similarly for 1G/220M at £932.40 + VAT, which is available across the whole FTTP footprint.
I am on Full Fibre 900/115 with Aquiss ISP. Don’t need extra speed. 🙂
https://www.thinkbroadband.com/speedtest/1768318988214239755
Bring it on, let’s get the connections to people and maybe invent a service by accident that can make full use of it.
On XG_S_-PON, why aren’t the speeds symmetrical? There is no longer a technical reason for this.
But when I can order it. Road is enabled