Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

UPD3 Ofcom UK Reveal Chosen Solution for Easier Broadband ISP Switching

Thursday, August 8th, 2013 (10:15 am) - Score 885
ofcom uk telecoms regulator

The UK telecoms regulator has today revealed their chosen method for making it “simpler and more reliable” for consumers to switch phone or broadband ISP. As expected Ofcom has decided to adopt a Gaining Provider-Led (GPL) switching process that will put most of the power into the hands of your new provider instead of the old one.

Today’s final proposal is the product of an incredibly long winded process, which first started at the end of 2010 when Ofcom published its Strategic Review of Consumer Switching and continued during May 2012 with the regulators second consumer switching consultation. Suffice to say that Ofcom has had to balance ISP concerns over cost and complexity with the desire for consumers to be able to easily switch providers.

At present most of the current systems (e.g. ‘Migration Authorisation Codes’, ‘Notification of Transfer’ or ‘Cease and Re-provide’) require your existing provider to be an active participant in the process and not all ISPs have been particularly keen to play ball. On top of that there’s no one method that works well for all broadband platforms and thus related processes can sometimes carry unexpected costs or downtime, especially if your existing ISP suddenly goes into administration or becomes unresponsive.

The new solution means that consumers will no longer need to contact their existing provider to receive a code in order to switch provider and will instead only need to contact the new one to arrange for a migration. This will be supported by new measures to help prevent abuse (e.g. consumers losing their service during the changeover process or being switched without their consent [slamming]).

The New Switching Process

* Providers must.. keep a record of every customer’s consent for any switch to protect them from being deliberately transferred to a different provider without consent – a practice known as ‘slamming’;

* Improve their use of certain processes to prevent against consumers losing service when changing provider, particularly when switching landline and broadband services together;

* Mitigate against consumers having their lines switched accidentally during house-moves, by only placing an order to take over communications services at the new property once they have an exact match for that address. Consumers moving out of the address where services are due to be taken over must also be notified by their own provider;

* Give consumers better information on the implications of changing provider, such as early termination charges, so they can make informed decisions on whether to switch.

However the new system only applies to BTOpenreach’s national telecoms platform and related copper phone and broadband products (e.g. ADSL2+ [WLR / LLU], FTTC etc.) and does not apply to fully fibre optic (FTTP/H) services or Virgin Media’s cable platform. This is not a surprise since copper and fibre/cable solutions are physically separate and thus some cost will always be levied to gain a new connection.

Claudio Pollack, Ofcoms Consumer Group Director, said:

Today’s announcement represents an important milestone in Ofcom’s work to improve consumers’ experience when switching provider. The move towards one clear and simple system led by the gaining provider will result in a switching process that works in consumers’ best interests. We will now be working on further measures to improve consumers’ experience of switching.”

Ofcom has now begun one last consultation on its final proposal and this will be open until 2nd October 2013. The regulator then hopes to finalise its new system by early 2014 and after that ISPs would be given a year’s grace to prepare before the new system was enforced. In other words consumers will probably have to wait until early 2015 (but some might adopt it sooner)!

But the regulator did say that it would also continue to work with ISPs to consider “further improvements to processes for landline and broadband switching between different network types (for example to and from the cable network)“.

Ofcom’s Switching Consultation (PDF)
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/../Consumer_Switching.pdf

UPDATE 10:20am

Ofcom has also highlighted some “in-depth consumer research” to support its approach, which found that 46% of consumers with a landline/broadband bundle who considered switching, but eventually decided against it, said that a lack of clarity about the switching process was something that put them off.

Similarly 60% who switched via a gaining provider led process found it easier than the losing provider led switchers. On top of that 19% of consumers following a losing provider led process said that loss of service during the transfer was a “main or major issue” experienced.

Finally 17% of consumers who spoke to their previous provider felt they were put under pressure to stay and 41% of those who were subject to persuasion were unhappy with the efforts their losing provider made to try and change their mind.

UPDATE2 11:24am

Sorry we completely forgot to link the consultation. Added above.

UPDATE3 12:13pm

Here’s a comment from TalkTalk.

A TalkTalk Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:

TalkTalk has long argued the switching process is unnecessarily complicated, therefore we welcome Ofcom’s announcement. A simpler, single switching process is vital for a more competitive market providing better value and choice for consumers.”

Leave a Comment
4 Responses
  1. Avatar cyberdoyle

    Its all a bit of a farce really, with the poor ISPs bearing the brunt as usual. They fight over the monopoly scraps, keeping the prices down as much as they can in the hunt for customers, who want the ‘cheapest’. This is what happens when a country is held to ransom by a copper cabal, only those in cities have real choice, ie phone line, cable or fibre internet access. The rest of us are stuck on the obsolete telephone network run by a monopoly and regulated by an old boys network.
    We should instead be on proper fibre by now, using an abundance model. Instead we’re on a cheap scarcity model, and it is so poor many remain analogue. If we want a digital nation we have to get the infrastructure to support it. Another decade of this and we’ll be so far behind we’ll never catch up with the digital revolution going on in other countries.
    We are now paying the price for having one of the best phone networks in the world, the one that helped the industrial revolution. We can’t keep living in the past. We have to find some fibre. Moral and Optic.

  2. Avatar 3G Infinity

    Easier to switch ISP, but when the ISP can only deliver over the single BT provided DSL connection it makes no difference other than 1 ISP is 10p cheaper and puts tech support on an 0870 while the second charges £1 more and has a 0845 with UK based staff.

  3. Avatar dragoneast

    As it’s flavour of the month, perhaps Dave could make it three referendums, with questions on:
    1. everyone paying a phone/broadband surcharge to fund a national FTTP roll-out; and whilst he’s at it
    2. a mandatory national scheme for the default blocking of unsavoury websites.
    It’s the only way to settle the debates, since everyone claims to know what everyone else wants/needs.
    And everyone else could get on with their job, including Ofcom and the ISPs.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £16.80 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Post Office £20.90 (*37.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £21.95 (*36.00)
    Avg. Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • SSE £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited (FUP)
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2589)
  2. FTTP (2365)
  3. FTTC (1701)
  4. Building Digital UK (1645)
  5. Politics (1490)
  6. Openreach (1468)
  7. Business (1288)
  8. FTTH (1170)
  9. Statistics (1132)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1087)
  11. Fibre Optic (994)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (950)
  13. Wireless Internet (947)
  14. 4G (942)
  15. Virgin Media (893)
  16. EE (618)
  17. Sky Broadband (617)
  18. TalkTalk (597)
  19. Vodafone (559)
  20. 3G (424)
New Forum Topics
»
Latency with IDNet
Author: BigAlbert
»
Zen latency
Author: BigAlbert
»
Online gaming / ping
Author: BigAlbert
»
»
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact