» ISP News » 

Global IPv4 Internet Address Supply Hits Critical Level – ISPs Must Prep IPv6

Thursday, May 22nd, 2014 (9:18 am) - Score 1,211

The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which among other things is the international organisation that has responsibility for Internet Protocol (IP) address space allocation (IANA use to do this), has warned that the global supply of IPv4 addresses has now reached a “critical level” and thus IPv6 adoption has become a “requirement for any network that needs to survive“.

ISPs assign a unique IP address to your connection each time you go online and the IPv4 standard – Internet Protocol version 4 (e.g. – remains the dominant method for practically all internet-capable hardware and software. However the Internet has become a busy place with lots of users and devices, all needing an IP address.

But you can only have around 4 billion addresses and since 2011 the IPv4 space has been in a state of gradual depletion, with Europe’s Regional Internet Registry (one of five RIRs in the world), RIPE NCC, handing out its final blocks in September 2012 (here).

As a result most RIRs have been rationing their supply of IPv4 addresses and now ICANN has officially begun the process of allocating the remaining small blocks to the five Regional Internet Registries, including RIPE NCC. As a result IANA’s IPv4 Recovered Address Space registry now only contains around 10 million addresses, which in the grander scheme of things is practically nothing.

Leo Vegoda, Operational Excellence Manager at ICANN, said:

The IANA IPv4 Recovered Address Space registry contained about 20 million IPv4 addresses earlier today and is now about half that size. Redistributing increasingly small blocks of IPv4 address space is not a sustainable way to grow the Internet. IPv6 deployment is a requirement for any network that needs to survive.”

Axel Pawlik, Managing Director of the RIPE NCC, told ISPreview.co.uk:

This is likely to be the last significant allocation of IPv4 addresses we receive from IANA. With three of the five RIRs now running IPv4 exhaustion policies, it is more important than ever that network operators accelerate full deployment of IPv6, which provides enough addresses for the rapid expansion of connectivity, to new devices and around the world.”

Thankfully Internet providers have a solution called Internet Protocol v6 (IPv6). The IPv6 standard has been around since the 1990’s and offers addresses that are significantly longer (128bits), written in hexadecimal, separated by colons and arguably more secure by design (IPSEC as standard). An IPv6 address, in its longest form, might look a little bit like this: 2001:cdba:0000:0000:0000:0000:2257:9652 (note: this can be shrunk to 2001:cdba::2257:9652).

The problem is that you can’t just create a new IP standard like IPv6, which can handle 340 trillion trillion trillion addresses, and expect the two to be directly compatible and indeed they’re not, which means that ISPs need to adopt dual-stack networks that allow both methods to play nicely together for the foreseeable future (eventually everything will be IPv6-only but that could take decades).

Unfortunately this transition period remains somewhat of a minefield given the mixed support for IPv6 addresses in hardware and software, particularly the older kit that’s still widely used. Similarly the need to retain backwards compatibility with IPv4 for some years to come can create other issues.

Some big ISPs have a large stockpile of IPv4 addresses but in order to stretch that out further they have to use solutions like internet address sharing (Carrier Grade NAT), which can create problems for many Internet systems that use unique IP addresses to identify, process and or block user activity (e.g. if you block a specific IP address from a service then that will impact others sharing the address). It can also create problems for some online games.

So far both PlusNet (here) and BT (here) have already played around with this and more are likely to follow, although in an ideal world we think that the best solution would be for ISPs to offer the ability to disable CGNAT in case of connection difficulties. But we’re not quite there yet and some ISPs have a sizeable pool of IPv4’s left, although eventually even they will have to adapt (some sooner than others).

In the meantime it’s amazing to think that there are still some sectors, such as certain router manufacturers, that continue to put hardware and software out without including IPv6 support as standard. Check out this article for more UK ISP opinions on the subject.

Leave a Comment
8 Responses
  1. Avatar Adrian says:

    AAISP have been providing IPv6 for 12 years and IPv6 is standard for all of our broadband installs.

    1. This is where I have to give a fellow ISP, AAISP, credit. Reading their articles/blogs some years back, we took the decision to also supply IPv6 as standard. Next month will be our 5th year of IPv6 provision.

      Worryingly, you can buy brand new routers today which have no IPv6 support at all (literally fresh models). Frankly they should not be sold IMHO.

  2. Avatar Karen says:

    Yet the four biggest UK ISPs by number (BT, Virgin, Sky, TalkTalk) don’t appear to be doing anything for retail.

    BT have enabled it for their leased line business, but don’t appear to have done none anything for end users. There was a rumour BT was going to be announcing something soon, but that was a few months ago and all has gone quiet.

    They give out the usual excuse that they have plenty of IPv4 addresses left. That doesn’t help when a BT user tries to connect to an IPv6 service and has to use tunnelling.

  3. Avatar DTMark says:

    Having dabbled briefly with CGNAT on our EE 4G connection – CGNAT will be a total disaster and support nightmare.

    It basically shrinks the internet down to a smaller selection of sites you can use. Sites behind paywalls or sites with some kind of security scripting to check the requesting IP are the sort of sites which become inaccessible.

    Which in time would lead to threads like “I’m with ISP A and I can’t access this particular site. Will I be able to access it with ISP B?”

  4. Avatar X66yh says:

    I though most mobile phone companies used CGNAT as standard for accessing the web via yr mobile.

    Plusnet trialled CGNAT some while ago and I don’t recall seeing howls of outrage on the sub-forum set up for the testers complaining about how this and that would not work.

    1. Avatar DTMark says:

      Three didn’t have CGNAT. It was only when we moved to EE that we saw it in action. We had to get a VPN for the connection to be of much use.

      Out of interest and in the context of the piracy debates, how does the rights holder even know who to approach – couldn’t it be any of 254 or more possible different IP addresses on the other side of the CGNAT?

      That would keep ISPs very busy trying to tally the request at one end with the response from the other to see who was who.

  5. Avatar X66yh says:

    This came up on the Plusnet trial – I was not on it, just an interested viewer.
    I gather that the ISP had to keep records as to whom was connected to what address at any instant precisely for the reasons you say.
    Those people who thought this was going to be some great piracy escape clause/free for all were greatly disappointed.

    I had heard some story that BT retail were actively using CGNAT for ‘low user amount’ type of accounts who were less likely to be doing things which CGNAT would break.

    1. Avatar DTMark says:

      “I gather that the ISP had to keep records as to whom was connected to what address at any instant”

      The size of such a database would be mind-blowing. I would guess the ISP must also back up that database to offsite storage.

      Makes the one I’m working on now, which is about 2GB and has a table with a couple of million rows in it, look like a mere toy.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £22.00
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Onestream £22.49 (*29.99)
    Avg. Speed 45Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.99 (*36.52)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £55 Reward Card
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (2812)
  2. BT (2791)
  3. FTTC (1790)
  4. Building Digital UK (1759)
  5. Politics (1687)
  6. Openreach (1641)
  7. Business (1454)
  8. FTTH (1341)
  9. Statistics (1250)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1248)
  11. 4G (1076)
  12. Fibre Optic (1071)
  13. Wireless Internet (1035)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1028)
  15. Virgin Media (1017)
  16. EE (708)
  17. Vodafone (680)
  18. Sky Broadband (674)
  19. TalkTalk (672)
  20. 5G (533)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact