
A new report from the Digital Communities All-Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) has warning that the “ongoing lack” of mobile (4G/5G) and broadband coverage in parts of the country (urban, rural and coastal) are “undermining national ambitions“. The solution, they suggest, could be found in planning reform, breaking down monopolies, stronger regulatory scrutiny by Ofcom and more strategic investment.
At present, nearly 90% of premises can already access a fixed gigabit broadband network (here) and Ofcom forecast this rising to around 91-97% (homes) by Jan 2028 (here). As for 5G, the regulator found (here) that it is available from at least one mobile operator at around 94-97% of UK premises or 64-89% from all operators combined.
The government has supported this through some key targets and other changes, such as the £5bn Project Gigabit programme and its aim of helping to extend gigabit broadband (1000Mbps+) ISP networks to “nationwide” coverage (c.99% of UK premises) by 2032, focusing mostly on the final 10-20% in hard-to-reach areas.
Advertisement
On top of that we’ve also got the £1bn industry-led Shared Rural Network (SRN) scheme to expand 4G into remote rural areas (4G coverage from at least one operator now reaches 96% of the UK’s landmass) and the Government retains an ambition “for all populated areas” to have access to Standalone 5G (5G SA) based mobile broadband technology by 2030. The latter is already available across 83% of areas outside of premises in the UK, or 47%-65% when looking at the range across different mobile operators.
However, the new APPG report, which has brought together MPs and Peers from the main political parties (led by Helen Morgan MP), has said the United Kingdom now “risks falling behind other countries unless more is done to boost adoption of high-speed broadband and 5G networks” (particularly closing the remaining gaps in rural coverage). The group has thus called on the government to commission an urgent, independent review of the country’s digital connectivity landscape.
Systemic Weaknesses Identified by the Inquiry
➤ Transparency and accountability:
Current coverage data relies heavily on operator-supplied modelling, which often fails to reflect real-world experiences. This disconnect has led to policy decisions and investment strategies that do not align with actual need. The report calls for Ofcom to adopt a more robust, independent approach to data collection and regulatory scrutiny.
➤ Market structure and competition:
The UK’s digital infrastructure remains dominated by a handful of major operators, limiting competition and slowing progress. Structural barriers—including inefficient planning processes and outdated legal frameworks—continue to stifle innovation. Breaking down monopolies and fostering a level playing field is critical to accelerating rollout.
➤ Economic imperative:
Delays in infrastructure deployment could cost the UK tens of billions in lost productivity. Conversely, successful adoption of 5G and full fibre could deliver gains worth over £200 billion by 2035. Closing the digital divide is not just a social imperative—it is an economic necessity.
The full report doesn’t really mention the monopoly issue much, but when it does it’s usually in reference to Openreach’s impact on the fixed line telecoms market. “Market saturation may cause some altnets to exit or be acquired by bigger firms. This will, to an extent, impact consumer choice and accessibility, but it also represents natural market churn. The Government must keep this in mind, particularly when reflecting on concerns raised during this inquiry about the significant influence of Openreach and its monopoly in the sector,” said the report.
Helen Morgan MP, Chair of the Digital Communities APPG, said:
“Digital connectivity is the backbone of modern Britain and is an essential lifeline – a piece of critical national infrastructure – for communities and businesses.
People in areas with persistently poor broadband or mobile coverage are left at a digital, social and economic disadvantage and risk losing out on opportunities for skills development, employment, and community engagement.
Without reliable access to high-speed services, the UK cannot achieve its economic ambitions or deliver inclusive growth. An urgent, independent review of the nation’s digital landscape is essential to restore trust, ensure transparency, and unlock the full potential of our economy.”
In fairness, a lot of the areas covered by the APPG seem to be ones that the government and Ofcom are already mindful of, or which they’ve already actioned. For example, Ofcom is already working to improve their data and mapping of mobile coverage (here) and the regulator’s imminent Telecoms Access Review 2026 (TAR) will update regulation for the fixed line sector to hopefully help foster a level playing field.
Advertisement
On top of that we’ve also recently had the government’s 10-Year UK Infrastructure Strategy (10YIS), which among other things confirmed a plan to “bring forward“ a more flexible permitting system (aka – flexi-permits) to boost street works across England and, following that, to ease the process of delivering gigabit broadband for leaseholders in blocks of flats (here).
Not forgetting that the government are also still in the process of trying to fully implement the Product Security and Telecommunications Infrastructure Act 2022 (PSTI), which introduced measures to make broadband and mobile infrastructure sharing, as well as network upgrades and related dispute resolution, easier to deliver (see our summary) – something mobile operators are pushing hard for (here).
The Government has also just kicked off a new consultation (here) on reforming more planning rules, which is seeking feedback on whether they should further change planning rules and update policy guidance to help “accelerate the deployment” of digital infrastructure (full fibre broadband and 5G mobile etc.).
Suffice to say that there’s already a fair bit of activity in this field, and thus it’s difficult to escape the feeling that the APPG’s report may, at least to an extent, be playing catch-up with current events.
Advertisement
Advertisement
So the “monopoly issue” is focused on OpenReach, not new built estates mostly controlled by OFNL and MS3. Again, incompetent people will be resolving wrong or non-existing problem.
You can add Connexin to this. Beal Homes in East Yorkshire now work with Connexin so all their new build properties have Connexin (City Fibre) service on day one. But no agreement exists between Connexin & KCOM or Connexin & MS3 to duct share. So a new monopoly is born.
Persimmon Fibrenest 2.0!
Also recently discovered that KCOM have cancellation fees if you exit due to moving house and they do not cover your address!
OFCOM, BDUK, DSIT and ministers need to look at this also!
Any mention of the premises covered by 3, 4 or 5 full fibre suppliers?
That APPG report summary has strong written-by-AI vibes, including the tell tale “it’s not just x, it’s y”.
“The UK’s digital infrastructure remains dominated by a handful of major operators, limiting competition and slowing progress”
I guess it’s no surprise that parliament has hardly anyone with a relevant background (I think there’s one Labour MP who has actually worked in the telecoms sector and later for Ofcom) that leads to stunners like this.
Infrastructure is hard. It is still hard even when you force Openreach to rent access to its crown jewel assets at knockdown prices. Altnets are now being subsidised to cover premises that have, or will eventually get, Openreach FTTP.
How many more times can Openreach’s hands be tied before it is recognised that telecoms is largely a natural monopoly in rural areas, and that it doesn’t work to have numerous companies chasing the same customers in (sub)urbia too. Philip Jansen’s comment about altnet tears remains evergreen.
5G could be solved by binning most planning regs (especially around long since disproven claims about health risks) and letting the networks crack on.
Was Ofcom supposed to stop Openreach building its own FTTP network & give free reign to the altnets completely? It was obvious Openreach was going to be there, likewise VMO2. Ultimately there is room for the 2 incumbents plus 1 other which could well mean once serious consolidation happens (if it ever does which I’m starting to doubt) there is going to be a lot of dead fibre in the ground & a lot of wasted capital given the large amount of overbuild between the altnets.
These reports should be focusing on alt nets like OFNL and fibrenest that hold monopolies over new build estates.
While I do agree there should be competition in the markets, no one provider should be able to prevent others and a forced ductshare agreement between all network providers should be considered with govt incentives for when they happen.
Saying that OR or VM have to share but then allowing smaller alt nets to lock others out is outrageous
The thing is that OFNL in theory offer this:
Current Services available from OFNL Wholesale include:
…
– Passive Services – Dark Fibre, Blown Fibre Tube, Sub-Duct
OFNL Wholesale has a varied product range which enables Service Providers to sell the following to their customers:
…
Passive services:
– Dark Fibre
– Blown Fibre Tube
– Large and Small Sub-Duct
but as one ISP said, they are so expensive that not many companies want to make a business with them.