Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Ofcom Business Review Forces BT Dark Fibre, Low Prices and Fast Installs

Tuesday, March 22nd, 2016 (9:17 am) - Score 3,995
BT major fibre optic cable junction telephone exchange uk

The UK telecoms regulator has today published the final outcome of its Business Connectivity Market Review 2016 (BCMR2016), which has proposed changes that among other things would open up access to BT’s national Dark Fibre network, cut leased line (Ethernet) prices and deliver quicker installs.

Ofcom’s review of the £2bn leased line market, which runs to more than 800 pages in length (here and here), kicks things off by stating that BTOpenreach has been “taking too long to install leased lines and is not providing adequate certainty that the services will be provided by the date first given to the customer.”

Jonathan Oxley, Ofcom’s Competition Group Director, said:

“All of us depend on high-speed, fibre optic lines. Businesses use them to communicate, and they also underpin the broadband and mobile services used by consumers at home and on the move.

BT is relied on by many companies to install these lines, and its performance has not been acceptable. These new rules will mean companies across the UK benefit from faster installation times, greater certainty about installation dates, and fast repairs if things go wrong.”

On top of that they also found that Openreach was failing to complete one in four leased line installations on the initial date it promised and as a result they’ve moved to impose new rules onto the operator’s high-speed ‘Ethernet‘ services, which should also shorten the install time (reaching 40 days after April 2017, instead of today’s 48 day wait).

bcmr2016_ethernet_install_times

Ofcom has further announced new Charge Controls to help push down the prices that BT charges for their leased lines, which is something that they seem to do at every business connectivity review. The new controls will apply to BT’s newer “very high speed” Ethernet lines and their older leased lines using Traditional Interface (TI) technology.

The New Charge Controls

* For BT’s Ethernet services with bandwidths up to and including 1Gbit/s, Ofcom has concluded an initial reduction in prices of 12%, with an overall cap of CPI -13.25%, for each year of the charge control.

* For BT’s traditional interface services with bandwidths up to and including 8Mbit/s, Ofcom has concluded an initial reduction in prices of 9%, with an overall cap of CPI -3.5%, for each year of the charge control.

The regulator said they would bring prices down over a three-year period from 1st May 2016.

Dark Fibre

Operators often build future capacity into their fibre optic networks to cope with expectations of rising demand, such as by laying additional fibres that might not all be made live (unlit) at the same time (saves money versus the need for future civil works). We often call these Dark Fibre.

The last business connectivity review in 2012 (here and here) flatly rejected the idea of using so-called Passive Remedies, such as Dark Fibre access, to improve the market. At the time Ofcom said it would, “carry significant risks of worse outcomes, both for consumers and for effective competition, including adding costs and encouraging inefficient entry.”

However all of this changed in May 2015 when Ofcom made a dramatic U-turn (here) and the recent Strategic Review outcome (here) only reinforced that decision as part of the goal to make Openreach’s national UK telecoms and broadband network more accessible to rivals (this may help ISPs to build rival networks and to do so more cheaply).

Ofcom’s Statement

This means BT would have to give competitors physical access to its fibre-optic cables, allowing them to take direct control of the connection. This service is often referred to as ‘dark fibre’, because the cables would not be ‘lit’ using BT’s electronic equipment. Instead, they would be ‘lit’ by the competitor installing its own equipment at either end of the optical fibre.

BT is already required to offer wholesale leased line products, which bundle the optical fibre and BT’s own network equipment, at regulated prices to competitors. BT would still be required to provide these services, but the new proposal would go further, allowing operators to use BT’s fibre-optic cables with their own equipment, rather than rely on BT’s equipment.

Ofcom’s earlier strategic review also proposed a new wholesale Duct and Pole Access (DPA) solution, which complements the above approach by giving rivals access to the cable ducts and telegraph poles that BT uses to run their network (details here).

Apparently the requirement on BT to make Dark Fibre available would apply in all parts of the UK except central London (including the City of London and Docklands) – where Ofcom deems that there is sufficient competition in the market – and Hull, where most leased lines are provided by KCOM (KC) rather than BT. The requirement would also only apply to a particular kind of leased line known as Contemporary Interface Symmetric Broadband Origination (CISBO).

However the big problem with both Dark Fibre and DPA is with the issue of price and administration (Gigaclear and Hyperoptic recently talked about these issues). BT will naturally want to get the best return possible, while Ofcom will wish to see a simplified administration process for the scheme and perhaps some lower pricing. Easier said than done and there are likely to be big differences between what BT wants and what Ofcom expects them to deliver.

A BT Spokesperson told ISPreview.co.uk:

“Today’s statement from Ofcom is very much in line with what they proposed last year so there are no surprises here. Competition and choice have been growing in the business connectivity market and we believe there is a strong case for less, not more, regulation.

We accept there is more to do on service and are committed to doing better and meeting our business customers’ rising expectations. Ethernet provision can be complex and the need for street works and wayleaves mean delays are often beyond our control. We are doing all we can to overcome such challenges. The required Ethernet price cuts and the introduction of dark fibre will not help to underpin service improvement.

Dark fibre is a flawed piece of regulation that introduces an unnecessary layer of complexity and will deter others from building their own fibre networks. It is at odds with Ofcom’s recent statements about increasing competition at the infrastructure level. It is a cherry pickers’ charter benefiting those who don’t invest in networks at the expense of those who do including BT, Virgin Media, Cityfibre and Zayo.”

Ofcom’s Strategic Review has put pressure on BT to propose a voluntary solution to some of these issues; otherwise Openreach could be split from BT’s control. At the very least Ofcom may have to intervene in order to finalise the terms for Dark Fibre.

The regulator is currently seeking a solution by the end of 2016, which means their final Dark Fibre fix wouldn’t be ready to use until 1st October 2017. In the meantime BT have been told to publish a draft Dark Fibre “reference offer” by 1st September 2016, which will probably show an initial outcome that favours BT’s position.. subject to more negotiation.

Ofcom has also notified today’s proposals to the European Commission and, short of any significant objections, they currently expect to publish their final statement next month.

UPDATE 10:27am

Added the latest BT statement above.

Add to Diigo
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
5 Responses
  1. Avatar MikeW

    In this instance, access to dark fibre does indeed smell like the decade-old solution of LLU in the residential market: A way to introduce price competition at the retail level, but (as now proven, and agreed by Ofcom), something of a dead-end in getting real infrastructure competition.

    After Ofcom headed away from LLU towards DPA, I was surprised to still see the dark fibre proposal in here.

    Or perhaps they think there is already enough fibre out there for the business leased line market? And they just want it used more?

    It’ll be interesting to see VM’s and CityFibre’s responses…

    • Avatar Steve Jones

      I’m guessing that this will end up with a lot of rebalancing OR “lit” leased circuit costs. Presumably the bandwidth costs will go down so it’s a more accurate reflection of the marginal costs of the extra bandwidth. However, I wonder whether Ofcom will step in at that point. According to the recent BT questioning by a select committee, Ofcom have deliberately kept OR fibre costs higher in order to foster infrastructure competition. It wouldn’t be the first time that Ofcom had done this to create margins.

      It’s also interesting to wonder what might have happened in Southend with the recent Cityfibre council dark fibre contract. If dark fibre were available from OR then the investment case for digging up all those main roads would look rather different.

    • Avatar MikeW

      I recall that BT mentioned that Ofcom were forcing prices of old-technology leased lines artificially high, in order to foster a move to fibre. I don’t recall it being applied to fibre, whether OR or otherwise.

  2. Avatar TheManStan

    I’m not convinced that this is part of the market that needs much help by way of regulation.
    I see it simply as part of the market that can be “easily” regulated and therefore by doing so makes OFCOM visibly regulating BT…

    • Avatar New_Londoner

      @TheManStan
      Totally agree, this seems to be action for the sake of it.

      Disappointing to reward the loud and lazy voices such as Vodafone, TalkTalk etc that complain a lot and invest next to nothing. We don’t need a regulatory that pushes a race to the bottom on price and doesn’t appear to comprehend the negative impact that its actions have on service and long-term investment.

      How about having a mandatory sunset clause in all regulations and regulators? This would at least incentive companies to act which enjoying the protection of a regulatory in the knowledge that they will be left to market forces after a defined period.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £18.00 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Code: SPRING19
  • Vodafone £21.00 (*23.00)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £22.50
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Direct Save Telecom £22.95 (*29.95)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £23.99 (*34.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2348)
  2. FTTP (1881)
  3. FTTC (1555)
  4. Broadband Delivery UK (1525)
  5. Politics (1292)
  6. Openreach (1285)
  7. Business (1140)
  8. Statistics (1010)
  9. Mobile Broadband (934)
  10. Fibre Optic (914)
  11. FTTH (901)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (845)
  13. Wireless Internet (842)
  14. 4G (814)
  15. Virgin Media (774)
  16. Sky Broadband (563)
  17. TalkTalk (543)
  18. EE (530)
  19. Vodafone (436)
  20. Security (378)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact