Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

Gov to Give UK Leaseholders Right to Request Gigabit Broadband in Flats UPDATE2

Monday, Dec 15th, 2025 (12:01 am) - Score 3,400
Block-of-UK-flats-and-apartments-MDU-123RF-ID147572482

The Government has today published a new consultation on measures that aim to create a new right for leaseholders, such as those living in blocks of flats / apartments (Multi-Dwelling Units), to request a gigabit broadband connection. In addition, freeholders will face a new duty not to “unreasonably refuse” such requests from tenants. But finding the right balance will be difficult.

Previous governments have already done a fair bit of work in an attempt to make it both quicker and cheaper for gigabit broadband networks to access big residential buildings (MDUs) and for tenants to request faster connections, such as via the Telecommunications Infrastructure (Leasehold Property) Act 2021 (TILPA); this tackled situations where so-called “rogue landlords” failed to respond (here and here).

NOTE: Openreach previously estimated that there were approximately 1 million premises in such buildings across the country for which this issue applies, and over 780,000 of those were said to be “at risk of no coverage from us or any other provider“.

The TILPA changes essentially introduced a cheaper and faster route for dispute resolution via a new court process, although this only applies after a landlord has repeatedly failed to respond to requests for access. Despite those changes, the process for network operators that wish to obtain new wayleaves (legal land/property access agreements) from landlords to install full fibre lines inside MDUs remains slow, difficult and often expensive.

Advertisement

For example, it remains difficult for network operators to find and contact the ultimate owner or managing agent of a building, while in other cases the building owner may be incentivised to reject a rival network after having previously signed an exclusive deal with a different provider. But this limits the competitive choices available to tenants.

Incumbent vs rivals

The next challenge stems from the disagreement between Openreach and alternative networks. Openreach has long campaigned for automatic upgrade rights, so they gain permission to access buildings in order to convert their existing copper cables inside MDUs to fibre optic ones (at present they can only make changes to the copper network).

The issue of automatic upgrade rights in MDUs sounds fair and logical, but rivals have already warned that this must not result in a situation that grants special access to Openreach – without also affording opponents a fair level of comparable accessibility. Doing so, they warn, could risk handing the incumbent an unfair competitive advantage (here).

Meanwhile, the Independent Networks Co-operative Association (INCA), which represents many altnets, has proposed a non-legislative approach based on collaboration and education (here), which they say would bring landlords and landowners on board with the need to deliver full fibre to MDUs and the benefits this will provide to tenants. But politicians and operators have spent the past few years trying to do things like this and, as above, some challenges remain.

Advertisement

The new consultation

Earlier this year the government rejected an amendment to the Renters’ Rights Bill for England (here), which has since become an Act (law). The amendment aimed to make it easier to deploy gigabit broadband into large residential buildings (MDUs), albeit only where deployment had been unreasonably refused or landlords cannot be contacted.

At the time the government said this was because the amendments didn’t cover everything (e.g. leasehold flats in MDUs that are not rented) and they were, instead, “actively considering options to identify what would be the best interventions to facilitate gigabit broadband deployment in privately owned multiple dwelling units” (i.e. more consultation was required).

The government’s new consultation, which proposes measures to create a new right for leaseholders to request a gigabit broadband connection and a duty for freeholders not to unreasonably refuse the request, is thus an attempt to address the above concerns (before committing anything to legislation). The specific focus here is on addressing scenarios where the landlord is unknown by network operators, or where the landlord is not minded to engage with connectivity issues or the deployment needs in leasehold flats.

Minister for Telecoms, Liz Lloyd, said:

“Measures like these are about fairness and improving the playing field for consumers, giving them better broadband connectivity. Whether you’re in a block of flats, a house, or a rural property, we want everyone to have access to the fast, reliable broadband needed for modern life.

These proposed measures would help deliver better connectivity for properties that face additional challenges to gigabit broadband rollout, and will ensure all UK families can benefit from the digital age.”

Just to be clear. The new measures would apply specifically to leaseholders. Leaseholder landlords would be able to apply the new right on renters’ behalf. The consultation, which will run  until 16th February 2026, seeks more information on whether renters are impacted by the challenges seen in connecting leasehold properties. At the time of writing we haven’t yet seen the consultation document, but will link to it once we have.

Advertisement

However, property owners / managers also have concerns that must be balanced in all this (i.e. insurance, damage to property, security, safety (e.g. fire, asbestos) and other liabilities etc.). In particular, upgrading copper lines to fibre in MDUs is often a bit more involved than it may seem (it’s not always minor work) and not everybody may want that.

On top of that there’s the problem of “intermediate landlords” within leasehold ownership schemes. For example, a leaseholder under a headlease with a freeholder who has granted leases of flats to individual leaseholders in respect of which they are the landlord. Sometimes there is more than one “intermediate landlord” in respect of a flat. These arrangements create complexities for the new proposal, and the government are still trying to figure out the best approach.

Finally, the consultation will consider the awkward question of network competition. There may be circumstances where the leaseholder is not aware that appropriate gigabit-capable broadband infrastructure is available within the block of flats and the government states it would then be reasonable for a freeholder to refuse a connection, while noting the existing provision.

However, the government is also seeking views on whether the new right should be extended to cover circumstances where a leaseholder is seeking the provision of broadband infrastructure from an alternative wholesale network operator than those already present in the building, which would boost competition and consumer choice.

Extract from the Consultation

Whilst it is unlikely to occur in many instances, as network operator deployments tend to be to all flats in a block, we do not consider it would be reasonable for a freeholder to refuse a request where existing gigabit capable connectivity is available in the building but not to the flat in question.

Further, where a freeholder has been unable to obtain a connection previously, including through a refusal in response to a leaseholder request, this should not provide a reasonable ground to refuse a request. Given the expansion of networks, technological developments and the pace of gigabit broadband deployment, it is quite possible that the ability of a network operator to deploy may have changed. Whilst this is the case, a relevant freeholder should not have to repeatedly consider applications that are excessive, lack serious purpose or are repetitive, unless there is an evidenced change of circumstances.

Applications that are excessive or lacking in purpose could occur where there is no value in the application. An example of which would be where a leaseholder has access to appropriate multiple network operator infrastructure capable of providing a gigabit-capable broadband connection. Similarly, should a repeat request not include details as to why the circumstances have changed, such as through a network operators build plans changing for the block of flats, then the relevant freeholder should be able to refuse the request at the point of the acknowledgement.

Suffice to say, network operators and the government are walking a bit of a tightrope in terms of the rights of freeholders and leaseholders. But in the meantime, it’s worth remembering that introducing any new legislative changes around this, if ultimately deemed necessary, will also take time and attract more debate (we’d guesstimate up to around 1-2 years before it’s law).

UPDATE 7am

The consultation document can be found here.

UPDATE 11:14am

We’ve had a comment from Openreach.

An Openreach spokesperson said:

“We welcome the Government’s new consultation. It’s something we’ve long campaigned for to make sure no one’s left behind. We believe that everyone should have access to the latest broadband technology and it’s a zero cost move that will support growth in the economy. We’ll respond to the consultation and urge the Government to review responses and introduce legislation rapidly to benefit homes and businesses across the UK.”

UPDATE 11:29am

We’ve added a comment from the UK Internet Service Providers Association (ISPA).

Andrew Kernahan, Head of Public Affairs, ISPA UK, said:

“We welcome the government’s commitment to exploring interventions that will enable leasehold flat owners to access faster, more reliable broadband. With 72% of people saying it is important that internet providers continue to invest in infrastructure upgrades, this clear public backing for industry investment must be matched by regulation that supports, rather than delays, our members’ rollout of gigabit-capable broadband.

We also recognise the need to balance the rights of all stakeholders in this process. We look forward to engaging with these proposals, which take us a step closer to ensuring that no one is left behind as we move towards more resilient digital connectivity.”

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
20 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Jonny says:

    I’m not sure a “right to request” achieves anything – everybody already had that right. Which tenants/leaseholders are going to be paying to test the “reasonable”ness of a refusal in court? In practise a freeholder can still put so many requirements in place that deployment becomes economically unviable.

    1. Avatar photo Winston Smith says:

      I think it would be in Openreach’s inrmyerest to support test cases.

      I suspect that in the next phase of their FTTP rollout, post PSTN switch-off, they will be much more interested in MDUs than they appear to be currently. I also think they’d want to move all their ADSL/FTTC connections to in any given MDU to FTTP at once, if possible.

  2. Avatar photo Shaukat says:

    i tried to get an altnet installed in a block of flats for my self and residents, but the talks broke down due to the costings involved per unit between that the alt-net could afford and what the landlord wanted. Whilst the some of the costs could have been added to the service charge as a one off, i don’t think the residents would want to pay that. We do have access to cable (HFC, 1Gb broadband), Open Reach (copper, 65Mbs), and Mobile Broadband from Voda/3UK (5G, 800Mbs). We can make do for the moment, on a block of flats which are 11 years old.

    For those who would want fibre installed, then it’ll be the case we would have to wait to see to see what the pre installed providers do and if they can upgrade without issues and would be willing to pay the price or will tenants have to pay part of the costs to upgrade.

    Lets see if the new government process makes it easier, but will add some feedback.

    1. Avatar photo YiddishPickle says:

      HFC is old and inconsistent technically is 1gigbit but Virgin media prices are not something avarage person would pay for fttc and copper will be shut down by 2028 so you should expect something certainly

      For now your building is stuck with hfc for 75 quid or starlink for 75 quid

      Both are expensive and shite but starlink is certainly better by long shot

    2. Avatar photo Benjamin says:

      in most cases openreach actually pay. my block had FTTC 80/20 thats it. After some big emails and talks I got the damn thing over the line.
      ok so G-PON is an older system and of course not as good as XGS-PON but I’d take G-PON any day of the week over FTTC.
      I do get my 910/110 (actually tests at 930/110).

      so if the altnet talks break down then try openreach as the process might just be a bit smoother.

    3. Avatar photo 125us says:

      FTTC and copper will not be shut down by 2028. Why do you think that?

      The PSTN will close and telephone will move to digital voice services. Copper broadband will continue for years to come.

  3. Avatar photo Optimist says:

    Now that PON fibre has become the de facto standard for future deployments, IMO it is perfectly reasonable for freeholders to insist on only one open-access provider per building, thus allowing residents to choose their ISP. Obviously there would have to be a way to oblige the incumbent to upgrade as necessary to meet customer expectations.

    1. Avatar photo The Facts says:

      Limited to those ISPs provided by that provider?

    2. Avatar photo Optimist says:

      @The Facts
      No, not limited to specific ISPs (hence the phrase “open-access provider”).

    3. Avatar photo Winston Smith says:

      Are there any such open-access providers?

    4. Avatar photo YiddishPickle says:

      You’d need minimum of two Open access providers ie Openreach and Cityfibre
      In case of London I’m guessing Openreach and Community fibre they has vodafone soon to be zen
      Depending on area you live in minimum should be two Open access providers

      Per Unit likely using Openreach PIA

    5. Avatar photo John W says:

      You could probably keep costs down by encouraging Openreach and Altnets to agree to serve MDUs via a communal handover point. That way the building could be cabled once by a thirdparty paid for by the building owners, and a mix of providers use the building fibre for the last hundred metres. Standardise on a (minimum) 2 fibre SC/APC presentation in the properties, and have clear fees from the providers charged for any reported faults which are found to be on the building fibre.

    6. Avatar photo Benjamin says:

      @John

      that does exist already except companies who do this (aka CTG) – do not follow the standard that altnets and openreach use and cannot get connected. look in the forum threads by users MatrixOptical and Bon who are/were having issues and you’ll see.

      in principle it should work, in reality everyone is differnet and then it doesn’t work.

  4. Avatar photo greggles says:

    So the government rejected the change to the renters rights bill as it wasn’t all inclusive (didnt help leaseholders), but now are ok with a solution for leaseholders, but still nothing in the works for those renting.
    If the solution is a leaseholder landlord will advocate for a tenant, then thats absolutely ridiculous. An assumption based on nothing but hope.
    Something is preventing them from doing the obvious which would be to put the control in the legal occupiers hands.

  5. Avatar photo Chris Sayers says:

    When their exchange is switched off, the landlord has a choice, allow FTTP, or leave users without any service, roll out must continue, if the landlord is willing to leave tennants unconnected, then rent by law is free until connected.

    1. Avatar photo benjamin says:

      absolutely this sentiment.
      as most cases the denied process isn’t safety. (some are). Inmy case it was simply a vanity project holding it up.
      initially they said their stakeholders/insurance/legal beagle had ‘supposedly’ said “under no circumstances must you allow this”. On the grounds of its a fire hazard.

      Openreach though did put all the fireproofing back in and done an excellent job.

    2. Avatar photo 125us says:

      FTTC doesn’t stop when an exchange is switched off. Why do you think that it will be?

  6. Avatar photo James says:

    I live in a flat, I have coax cable from Virgin Media that goes off when the green box in the street gets too hot. They don’t seem able to fix. VDSL from Openreach has degraded to under 30Mbps download and 1Mbps upload, so no use for home working. There are two Alt Nets in the street, neither are open access. Openreach FTTP has no sign, and we are all underground, no idea on ducts. Neither Alt Net can get the building owner (a registered social landlord/housing association) to respond. The Alt Nets offer symmetric services. I have (expensive) asymmetric from a faulty DOCSIS network, so I choose slower than gigabit for price reasons. None of the above gives me hope anything will change.

    1. Avatar photo Benjamin says:

      your social landlord/housing association is seeing the message. just ignoring it.
      Do what I did, find a director or better yet CEO of said association keep that to one side.
      log the issue with openreach CEO -or- CEO of altnet.
      once its passed to the right team of altnet, then email the housing association as to why its blocked, tag the altnet contact in.

      keep at it and swat any silly ecuses they come up with. raise your points why its needed etc and you’ll get the ball rolling.

  7. Avatar photo Marco says:

    Absolutely ridiculous; a waste and inefficient use of resources. Everyone needs fast wifi and copper must go. Why consult and give rights to request, and go through a 2 year process vs mandate all old and new builds bring fibre to the door. Such antiquated, old school thoughts that are beyond this government and outdated for modern ways of working. Jeez!!. Please enter the millennium and make fubre a right. The 1800s are over.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
264Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £24.99
145Mbps
Gift: £150 Reward Card
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £24.99
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £17.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £20.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
O2 UK ISP Logo
O2 £21.24
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
New Forum Topics
By: The Wee Bear
By: The Wee Bear
By: The Wee Bear
By: The Wee Bear
By: AbsolutelyRidiculous
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Vodafone UK ISP Logo
Vodafone £22.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Beebu UK ISP Logo
Beebu £23.00
100 - 160Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact