Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored

Do Big UK ISPs Really Plan to Block Website Forums and Swearing

Monday, August 5th, 2013 (1:48 am) - Score 1,623

The government’s controversial strategy for protecting children online by requiring the country’s largest broadband ISPs to introduce network-level filtering of adult websites (here) has come under fire again after some reports suggested that “Web Forums“, “Esoteric Content” and possibly even bad language might be on the censorship list. We attempted to find the truth.

As most people know the new filters will force all of BT, TalkTalk, Virgin Media and Sky Broadband’s customers (i.e. the bill payers) to make a choice about whether or not they opt-out of the new censorship measures (if you ignore / skip-though the choice when it’s presented then you’re opted-in by default).

After that customers whom have chosen to leave the filter enabled will be presented with a list of content categories that the filter will block. Each option on the list will come pre-ticked and, using the example of TalkTalks HomeSafe solution, the categories are expected to look broadly similar to this.

homesafe talktalk block categories

Like many people we have strong reservations about something like Social Networking being on such a list because this is an incredibly broad definition (i.e. you could in theory apply it to almost any website that allows visitors to interact with other people).

Admittedly some of the major social networks already claim to be for those aged 13+ or adults only. But in practice you’d have to be incredibly naïve to think that many younger children don’t already have an account. Blocking that wouldn’t go down well but at least it’s an option.. albeit a pre-ticked one.

What the heck is esoteric content!?

At the end of last month the Open Rights Group (ORG) warned that the United Kingdom could be “sleepwalk into censorship” by starting down a path towards default censorship and pre-ticking options that people could easily overlook and some of which may not even be “adult content” at all. On top of that most internet users have already become subconsciously use to automatically ignoring similar website pop-up windows.

Jim Killock, ORG’s Executive Director, said:

What’s clear here is that David Cameron wants people to sleepwalk into censorship. We know that people stick with defaults: this is part of the idea behind ‘nudge theory’ and ‘choice architecture’ that is popular with Cameron.

The implication is that filtering is good, or at least harmless, for anyone, whether adult or child. Of course, this is not true; there’s not just the question of false positives for web users, but the affect on a network economy of excluding a proportion of a legitimate website’s audience.

There comes a point that it is simply better to place your sales through Amazon and ebay, and circulate your news and promotions exclusively through Facebook and Twitter, as you know none of these will ever be filtered.

Meanwhile ISPs face the unenviable customer relations threat of increased complaints as customers who hadn’t paid much attention find websites unexpectedly blocked.”

But the ORG also suggested that some ISPs might be planning to add two even broader categories to the above list, “Web Forums” and “Esoteric Material“; if that last one made you go “Eh!?” then you’re not alone because that’s the same reaction we got from all four of the largest ISPs (except BT that merely furnished us with a bland response).

Suffice to say that “Esoteric” probably isn’t one to worry about, although on background it very generally means information that only a select few have special knowledge of or simply private / secret / confidential information. An unusual category for parental controls.

Censorship of Web Forums

A potentially bigger issue is the suggestion that “Web Forums” could be included, which is about as broad as you can get (millions of websites run web forums) and would naturally cause concern to both ourselves and perhaps even ISPs (note: some ISPs run forums filled with angry customers whom don’t always use polite expressions – SHOCK).

This naturally begs the question, would such censorship apply to all forums or only specific ones and how is that defined? At this point we’re reminded of how Russian politicians are looking to extend an existing law so that it could be used to ban foul language on websites and related discussion boards in order to protect children (here). No joke.

Now as we all know, adults and children never swear in the real world. Nope, madness, that would never ever happen. Politicians, comedians, parents, Joe and Jane.. none of us ever swear. We’re all good as gold you see. We do what the state tell us and nothing more.. only as the state commands. Now back to the real world and some UK politicians are probably looking at that idea with envy but thankfully nobody has called for such excessive censorship.. so far.

Admittedly bad language can be a frustration and most websites, such as ours, have rules against it, yet moderating such content is never an easy task. For example, people might change related words to create masked vulgarity, normal words can be taken out of context to appear like swearing or what about when a website publishes a lot of tweets that feature swearing so as to expose a bad person. It’s a slippery slope away from free speech.

But never fear for the government has called upon ISPs to “improve their filters to ensure they do not – even unintentionally – filter out legitimate content“, which is a bit like asking email providers to ensure that anti-spam filters never catch legitimate emails or telling your car engine that it should never break down.. or else you’ll legislate to stop it doing so.

What the ISPs say

The most informative response we had was from TalkTalk, which is understandable since their solution has already been implemented. According to TalkTalk’s spokesman, neither esoteric content nor web forums will be part of their categories (indeed you can see that above, unless you count social networks). But the issue of how their filter handles swearing is more complicated.

TalkTalk explained that its HomeSafe filter will scan unknown pages as customers visit them and attempt to see if it falls into one of their categories (e.g. if a site called ‘Bert’s Betting Emporium’ came along then it would be scanned and if keywords like ‘Bet Here’ and ‘Odds’ etc. came up then it might go into the gambling category).

Similarly the ISP stated that, if a website has a lot of violent swearing, then its filter might categorise that as a violent site and sexual swearing could indicate an adult website. Mind you we’ve seen plenty of forums with similar content and that’s just from trolls and robot spam posts. TalkTalk also noted that its customers can report incorrect blocks, which has allegedly only happened on a few occasions. It should also be noted that other ISPs tend to have a different system and approach.

Sadly BT shunned our questions by saying that they would “provide more details on this solution closer to launch” and Sky Broadband similarly said that they were still considering what categories to include. However, as we understand it, Sky are considering whether or not to include “web forums” and they’re also conscious of the fact that many forums come with an age requirement (we’re not sure how relevant this is since Facebook does too but they’re often a blocking target).

Elsewhere Virgin Media said that it’s filter “will block adult content, so if a web forum is an adult content web forum then it could be blocked by our parental controls“. The spokesperson clarified that “adult content” relates to age-restricted content like pornography, gambling or violent content suitable for people aged 18 and over. Virgin also confirmed that their filters “do not look for swearing“.

Suffice to say that the question mark has not been entirely lifted from this topic.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
10 Responses
  1. Avatar timeless

    we arent walking into censorship.. Cameron knows exactly what he is doing this is the plan.. and the public is eating it out of his hands because a majority of parents are too damn lazy to keep an eye on their childrens internet usage!

    what these parents dont understand is that not only will we as customers have to foot the bill of these changes but that these systems will be a waste of time and money.. l already have the tools to get around the blocks not that l will be opting in.

    problem is, with the way things are going l doubt it will make much difference as it wont be long before ISPs will be ordered to turn it on for everyone.. and l expect it to be used in exactly the same way media blackouts have been used to keep news about large NHS reform protests from getting out to the general public.

    • Avatar DTMark

      It’s the Daily Mail “Something must be done” style of approach.

      “The biggest argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter” (Winston Churchill)

    • Avatar timeless

      exactly, and most ppl are too lazy to take their own initiative and look for someone else to take it for them… this is why we are subjected to our current government.. no one bothered to vote because they couldnt be bothered to do something about the situation themselves.

  2. Avatar Merton

    In order to be eligible to sign up for Facebook, you must be at least 13 years old… not 18, which is why teenages are also using it 🙂 Yes i’m being a smart ar$e!

  3. Avatar dragoneast

    I’m in two minds about all this. Half of me says that anything that forces people to use their brains whilst resorting to the internet can’t be bad. Though that can’t be the politicians’ intention as they’d surely be the biggest losers.

    I can just about recall when my first ISP send me a list of “net-etiquette” when I first signed up for their service. Good stuff. The check box and ham fisted blocking stuff wasn’t necessary or half as effective.

  4. I think you will find that the big ISPs will be informed of what “esoteric” information is once they implement these adult content censorship plans. Mainly any unfiltered news and knowledge not approved by ‘The Ministry of Truth’.

  5. Avatar Captain Cretin

    Bring Back AOLs “walled garden” and stick all the politicians and Daily Mail readers in there – PROBLEM SOLVED.

  6. Avatar BV

    Classic Problem – Reaction -Solution politics…

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £19.95 (*22.00)
    Avg. Speed 50Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: Promo Code: HYPER20
  • SSE £22.00
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Plusnet £22.50 (*35.98)
    Avg. Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: £50 Reward Card
  • xln telecom £22.74 (*47.94)
    Avg. Speed 66Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Onestream £22.99 (*34.99)
    Avg. Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Prices inc. Line Rental | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (2741)
  2. FTTP (2670)
  3. FTTC (1768)
  4. Building Digital UK (1723)
  5. Politics (1631)
  6. Openreach (1592)
  7. Business (1403)
  8. FTTH (1330)
  9. Statistics (1223)
  10. Mobile Broadband (1195)
  11. Fibre Optic (1048)
  12. 4G (1027)
  13. Wireless Internet (1009)
  14. Ofcom Regulation (1004)
  15. Virgin Media (992)
  16. EE (678)
  17. Sky Broadband (662)
  18. TalkTalk (653)
  19. Vodafone (651)
  20. 5G (487)
Promotion
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact