» ISP News » 

SNP and Labour Criticise UK Gov Failure to Support a 30Mbps Broadband USO

Wednesday, May 3rd, 2017 (5:51 pm) - Score 589

Last week’s entirely unsurprising decision by the Government to drop a proposed 30Mbps Universal Service Obligation (USO) for broadband, in favour of the originally proposed 10Mbps, has not gone down well with either the opposition Labour Party or SNP. Both have branded it a “missed opportunity.”

Since last year the Digital Economy Bill 2016-17, which was approved last week and will now become an Act, has been proposing a new legally-binding USO that from 2020 would give everybody the right to request a minimum broadband speed of 10Mbps+ from the chosen suppliers. This is a big step up from the current USO, which only supports a basic copper telephone line and “functional” Internet access (slow dialup could meet this).

Generally speaking USO’s are only intended to cater for an absolute minimum level of service (most EU states either have no USO for broadband or something much slower than 10Mbps). However, in February 2017 the House of Lords threw a political spanner into the works by voting to approve a radically different USO that would set the minimum speed at 30Mbps+ and hold an aspiration to deliver 2Gbps for all via FTTPbefore 2020” (here).

Considering that the Government’s non-binding virtual commitment for fixed line broadband currently only envisages achieving around 97% coverage of “superfast broadband” (this usually reflects speeds of 24Mbps+ or 30Mbps+) by 2020 then the chances of a 30Mbps USO, which Ofcom estimated could have cost up to £2bn to deliver (here), being passed was always quite remote. However it was an attractive attempt to do something more radical and we commend the effort.

By comparison the 2Gbps for all via FTTP target was clearly bonkers, although it might have had more weight had the Lords chosen to give it a much.. much more distant time-scale instead of the completely absurd “before 2020” expectation. Maybe add a decade or two to that and a few tens of billions of pounds in investment, albeit from where.. we don’t know.

In any case there’s a General Election coming on 8th June 2017 and so last week’s predictable decision by the Government to drop the 30Mbps USO amendment (here) and return to their original 10Mbps figure has of course come under fire because.. politics.

Fergus Ewing (MSP), Scotland’s Connectivity Secretary for the SNP, said:

“Unfortunately the UK Government has chosen the short-term option and set the USO at just 10Mbps, that is a missed opportunity and it does demonstrate how the reserved nature of telecoms can often undermine our policy ambitions here in Scotland.

It’s not the taxpayers’ job to fund the provision of mobile or internet services in cities where frankly commercial operators already do that and make a good return. Where our money in Scotland and the UK comes in and is required is to get the other parts where commercial operators wouldn’t otherwise reach, the rural parts and the island parts, and sadly that’s where we’ve really been badly let down by the UK Government.”

The Scottish Government (SNP) has already announced an aspiration to make 30Mbps+ broadband available to 100% of premises by 2021 via an “outside-in” approach (prioritising public investment for the hardest to reach rural areas first), which is an improvement on the existing £410m Digital Scotland project that aims to make “high speed fibre broadband” available to 95% of the country by the end of March 2018.

As yet we’re still awaiting details on how the Scottish Government will achieve their new universal coverage aspiration, not least in regards to their technology choices (inferior Satellite perhaps?) and funding. Nevertheless Scotland deserves credit for setting a clear ambition for universal coverage of superfast broadband, which is something that the central UK Government has been unable to match.

Naturally the SNP aren’t the only party with knives out and the UK Labour Party has now joined in the fun.

Louise Haigh, Shadow Digital Economy Minister, said:

“Of course we would have liked the government to back 30Mbps for all and I do not accept that millions of consumers and businesses should simply be left behind. This was an opportunity to prepare the UK for the ubiquitous future demanded by the digital revolution and although the Government’s amendment is a first step, it is a baby step and nothing more.”

The Labour party has previously made plenty of noise about wanting to foster a national roll-out of ultrafast FTTP connectivity, which would be supported by a huge injection of public funds. However achieving this, without at the same time distorting market competition (Ofcom is trying very hard to encourage competition at infrastructure level), could be quite tricky. We hope to see more details when their manifesto is published.

In the meantime the UK Government (Conservative) has pledged to keep the broadband USO under review and raise it from 10Mbps once 75% of households have upgraded to a “superfast broadband” service, which could take a very.. very long time. A further public consultation on the detail is expected after next month’s election.

As always when it comes to politics, take the things politicians say with a big pinch of salt until they’re fully costed and put down in a detailed policy paper. Even then some extra salt can still come in handy.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Tags: ,
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on Twitter, , Facebook and Linkedin.
Leave a Comment
6 Responses
  1. Tom Bartlett says:

    I think the SNP should stand in West Sussex

    1. Billy says:

      I agree, if they revised the Scottish border slightly and aligned it with the M25, independence would be a foregone conclusion.

  2. h42422 says:

    This is not the first, nor the last time when SNP gets it wrong.

    Yes, 30Mbps is much better than 10Mbps. 10Mbps in year 2020 is also a ridiculously low speed. No problems there.

    The problem is, we have a lot of FTTC enabled lines in the 10-30Mbps bracket. There is LR-VDSL that could improve these, and if Openreach were forced to start a full FTTP rollout today, it would focus on areas already receiving decent speeds, as it would be “best results with money spent”.

    Those currently suffering 30Mbps.

    How I see the situation, 10Mbps USO forces OR to finally tackle those lines it has been consistently ignoring this far for cost and effort reasons. 30Mbps USO forces OR to spend their penny mostly migrating to LR-VDSL and G.fast. Those getting 24Mbps now would then get 50, and those getting 1Mbps now would then be getting 1Mbps.

    I think it is time to finally lift those suffering from 1990’s speeds to this millennium. The next stage is then 30Mbps, 100Mbps or whatever it is, but if we set the target there now, those who are unable to use the internet for anything else but email and basic web browsing, would be completely forgotten for years to come. 10Mbps allows and forces this, as there is no excuse anymore not to upgrade the last 5%.


    1. Dave says:

      Oh yes there is. One huge get out clause called satellite. Just like the USC the USO will be no different for those with sub 1Mbps speeds we will be told ‘its to expensive so here is £350 now piss off and get satellite’

    2. DTMark says:

      I have been checking the speeds available at properties as we’re looking to move to Scotland. Probably Perthshire. I have so far only found one that can achieve more than 1Mbps.

      So from what I can see, Scotland haven’t even begun working on a broadband project.

      Yes, the cities might well have faster speeds, and I’m looking at the more remote ones: but at the end of 2015, every property should have been able to get 2Mbps (unless Scotland was exempted from that?)

      It’s all well and good having a USO but you then need some kind of broadband project to actually deliver it. It doesn’t just happen by magic.

    3. h42422 says:

      True about satellite. For rural connections, 30Mbps or something leaving satellite out might have been better. I am on a long, urban EO line with no upgrade plans and I hope 10Mbps will force them to finally rearrange us to a cabinet.

      Then again, I sort of think a rural 1Mbps connection would not be a priority to OR anyway, no matter where USO would be set. The higher it is set, it would just mean they would have a lot of work to do in upgrading many of those lines already using their “good” infrastructure.

      Fixing rural connections and urban EOLs cost a lot of money. If we set 30Mbps USO and they could with X million choose to upgrade Y difficult connections to over-USO or Y*3 much easier to upgrade connections, which one would they choose? I fear we would not be in the scope in the foreseeable future, no matter what.

Comments are closed.

Comments RSS Feed

Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheapest Ultrafast ISPs
  • Gigaclear £17.00
    Speed: 200Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Community Fibre £20.00
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £24.00
    Speed: 108Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £25.00
    Speed: 100Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £25.00
    Speed: 150Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • Hyperoptic £17.99
    Speed 30Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Virgin Media £20.00
    Speed 54Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • NOW £21.00
    Speed 36Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Shell Energy £21.99
    Speed 35Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
  • Vodafone £22.00
    Speed 38Mbps, Unlimited
    Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (4030)
  2. BT (3135)
  3. Politics (2089)
  4. Building Digital UK (2009)
  5. Openreach (1951)
  6. FTTC (1917)
  7. Business (1811)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1590)
  9. Statistics (1493)
  10. FTTH (1370)
  11. 4G (1361)
  12. Virgin Media (1266)
  13. Ofcom Regulation (1230)
  14. Wireless Internet (1224)
  15. Fibre Optic (1223)
  16. Vodafone (920)
  17. EE (900)
  18. 5G (878)
  19. TalkTalk (817)
  20. Sky Broadband (782)
Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact