Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Survey Claims Lack of Gigabit Broadband “Prevents” Streaming in UK Rural Areas

Tuesday, Jul 13th, 2021 (1:10 pm) - Score 2,040
video streaming player

A new YouGov survey of 2,016 UK adults, commissioned by Netgem, has claimed that up to four in five rural respondents would like more than “broadband only” offers from ISPs, but the “lack of gigabit-capable broadband availability currently prevents them from accessing the popular streaming services the rest of the nation enjoys.” Does it?

The survey also noted that Scottish respondents were twice as likely to have no streaming subscriptions at all compared to London, which they added was “unsurprising given that up to 24% of some areas of Scotland have broadband speeds of under 15Mbps, compared to 0.82% in London.”

So far as we can tell, the aforementioned figures are based on network availability data from Thinkbroadband (not speedtest data), which is good, but at the same time the use of ambiguous wording like “some areas” overlooks the fact that nearly 95% of Scotland is now estimated to be covered by a 30Mbps+ capable network and just 2.92% can only get below 10Mbps speeds.

Similarly, we don’t entirely agree that the lack of gigabit-capable broadband “prevents” those in rural areas from “accessing popular streaming services.” Not that gigabit-capable broadband isn’t brilliant to have, but most streaming services can deliver content at speeds of down to c.0.5Mbps, while HD quality streams will work at 5Mbps on Netflix, YouTube [720p] and iPlayer etc. The best 4K streams usually need 20Mbps or more.

Summary of Additional Survey Findings

➤ 79% of rural respondents are unsure or are considering switching to an ultrafast broadband package that included streaming services as part of the bundle, and only 21% would not consider it. This is despite the fact that only 25% of these same respondents currently had a TV and broadband package.

➤ 57% of 18–24-year-olds, 62% of full-time students and 59% of households with one or two children outlined that they would be more likely to switch to a broadband provider that could include these [TV and WiFi] services as part of the overall package.

At this point it should go without saying that Netgem, as a provider of Pay TV and WiFi Mesh solutions to UK ISPs, has a vested interest in the results of such a survey and thus their study should be taken with a pinch of salt.

Shan Eisenberg, CCO at Netgem UK, added:

Today’s findings show that there is a clear link between slow average broadband speeds and lack of uptake in streaming services. The research shows that the demand for ultrafast broadband and streaming services is there in rural areas, so there is a huge opportunity for the Altnets to fill this gap in the market and bring consumers in underserved areas of the countries the Fibre and TV streaming bundles that are so successful everywhere in the country.”

As above, you don’t need gigabit broadband to have a good streaming experience, although the extra speed and reliability of such networks would still be welcomed by many consumers. At present, around 42% of the UK are within reach of gigabit-capable connectivity, and this is expected to hit c.60% by the end of 2021.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
31 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Frustrated Scot... says:

    …..At present, around 42% of the UK are within reach of gigabit-capable connectivity, and this is expected to hit c.60% by the end of 2021….

    Yup, sure will, Mark, right, and that’ll be delivered by BT/OR, right, because they are simply the best and they never renege on promises and deliveries, particulary in the so called ‘hard to reach’ places, which covers probably most of Scotland!!

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      At present most of it stems from Virgin Media’s DOCSIS 3.1 upgrade on their existing network, while FTTP alone covers c.24% across multiple operators.

  2. Avatar photo Ian says:

    Perhaps it is confusion over terminology… I don’t need or want Gigabit speeds, but I can’t get a decent speed over my FTTC connection (I get 13Mb down and 0.6 up.) We mostly do ok with these speeds, but it’s not so good watching iplayer and trying to do zoom at the same time (or trying to watch two different iplayer programmes.)
    We would love a reliable 40/10 service, it seems that is only available over FTTP – does that mean we want giga-bit capable service? Our legacy 1.6km copper line is not really doing it for us anymore and would like something much better.

    1. Avatar photo Pip says:

      That’s exactly what it means.

    2. Avatar photo Martin says:

      That is one of the limitations of FTTC. For FTTC to work properly the copper side needs to be no more than 600-700 metres long to get a reasonable 50mb/s connection and not more than 1km of copper from the PCP cabinet to your home as that is where it really starts to degrade.

      I have also seen this elsewhere and a similar distance of around 1.6km where a property is connected to a cabinet down the bottom of a hill. But a a few doors down there is another pcp cabinet and fibre cabinet that they can’t get connected on. It’s strange how Openreach connect properties sometimes in not the most logical way.

    3. Avatar photo The Facts says:

      @Martin – that was the GPO sometime in the last century.

    4. Avatar photo Buggerlugz says:

      Martin, best FTTC I ever saw was a cabinet at the end of a customers drive-way, pole by the side of it, up and across to the house, probably 50m tops. Was a great example of a BT’ “fibre connection” delivering an amazing 5mbps!

    5. Avatar photo Yes says:

      @Buggerlugz well that was either a fault on the line or the property wasn’t supplied by that FTTC cabinet then

    6. Avatar photo GNewton says:

      “that was the GPO sometime in the last century.”

      Irrelevant! The copper is now owned by BT and managed by Openreach.
      And it is a known fact that BT is more than a decade behind of where it should be with regards to replacing copper with fibre.

    7. Avatar photo The Facts says:

      @GN – (your have detected my post to troll me) – It is a known fact that alternative networks have had 30 years to supply a fibre connection to every property in the UK, yet have failed to do so.

    8. Avatar photo GNewton says:

      @TheFacts: Back to using your offensive language again when posters disagree with you?

      Anyway, you are not telling the whole story here, more like half-truths.
      Remember the The Post Office Act 1969, or the 1981 British Telecommunications Act?

      BT already had a complete infrastructure in terms of ducts, poles, exchanges, etc, unlike other new telecom infrastructure companies, yet until recently wasn’t able to make use of it for building widespread fibre networks. There is a reason why BT is regulated, and why there is a PIA. And to this very day, 3/4 of this country has now fibre access from BT.

    9. Avatar photo GNewton says:

      correction: “… has no fibre access …”

  3. Avatar photo JmJohnson says:

    Mark… the reoccurring trend in articles and most comments is a narrow focus.
    Almost always it’s focusing on the specific requirement of just 1 use whilst forgetting that multiple services will be using the internet in a household.
    Example… My household has a few computers, Sky, mobiles and a few consoles.
    When I stream I have to turn off the kids consoles otherwise I experience packet loss due to a lack of bandwidth and this is over a 40/10 connection.

    So yes, whilst on paper a 30+ connection is more than enough for streaming, in real life use cases it isn’t.

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      Yes I completely agree, but the article isn’t at all designed to be a wider examination of gigabit needs, it is intentionally focused on examining the survey’s own narrow claim and dissecting that alone, without being too wordy. There are of course other caveats here too, but that’s been covered before:

      https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2020/12/why-buying-gigabit-broadband-doesnt-always-deliver-1gbps.html

      But gigabit broadband isn’t so much about the top speed, it’s about delivering a much more reliable and capable network with a choice of speeds that people can upgrade to as and when needed. The thing is, you don’t need 1Gbps for video streaming to work or work well. To claim that is misleading.

  4. Avatar photo R Walker says:

    I believe the ISP’s need to break out of the Upload Download ratios that we now have due to ADSL legacy. I don’t need or want 1GB download but could do much more with a service that provides a 50/50 split on the upload and download speeds. I have Virgin fibre avalable on my street but get a better upload speed with FTTC from Plusnet.

    1. Avatar photo CarlT says:

      Virgin have 36 Mb/s upload on the 350 package, 20 on the 200. Both higher than FTTC can achieve.

    2. Avatar photo GNewton says:

      FTTC can achieve 20 Mb/s upload speed on its 80/20 packages, albeit only for short copper lines.

      And yes, VMs cable is not suitable for many office usages which require better upload speeds, the same is true with Openreach FTTC, and to a degree, with OpenReach FTTP. A 50/50 package would be far more useful than e.g. a 80/20 one.

    3. Avatar photo CarlT says:

      Most offices don’t have symmetrical bandwidth usage Mr Newton. However often you keep saying they do they just don’t.

      Some industries, sure. Most small branch offices, retail stores, etc, which are the bulk of network locations by number, nope.

      Big market in either augmenting or replacing leased lines with cheaper asymmetrical broadband services.

      Symmetrical is ideal but most of the time reliability or tail to an MPLS network are the business cases.

      Phone calls are 64k/call, standard video calls a couple of megabits.

      Bigger offices will likely want a leased line for other reasons than bandwidth, such as the SLA.

      Smaller ones a couple of diverse broadband services or a small leased line augmented with broadband works.

    4. Avatar photo CarlT says:

      BTW FTTC can’t achieve 20 Mb of throughput on upstream, which is why it’s not sold as 20 Mb.

      VM cable can and does: it’s capped at a little over 22 Mbit on the 200/20 service.

      VM Business cable goes to 500/50. Assuming all is working as it should be as far as pure bandwidth goes that seems better to me that symmetrical 50, the service level guarantee, repair time, etc, are the driver towards leased lines.

      Not that I’m a big VM fanboy, just pointing out inaccuracy.

    5. Avatar photo R Walker says:

      I should have mentioned I was also on about price point compairing FTTC to Virgin fibre.
      I’m also lucky as I am quite close to the street cab and get good speeds, yes I know the top end Virgin packages have faster upload but at a cost I don’t want to pay and download speeds I will never use.

    6. Avatar photo CarlT says:

      Sometimes we get what we pay for.

  5. Avatar photo Sam says:

    I finally have gigabit ordered and being installed over the next 3-4 weeks with Zen.
    Jurassic Fibre kept saying “next month” as each month passed.

    Exciting times! No more buffering!

  6. Avatar photo Sean says:

    Speed is ok for me, and most of my village close to Cambridge. I’m sure we’ve had 3 concurrent zoom calls and an X over VPN type session many times. There are some at the ends of some of the streets who are just a little bit too far from the cabinet thought, or people with more data intensive work to do. Reliability is the big issue. Rain can make my ~45 Mbps connection unreliable far too often, and plenty of people here say they will pay to upgrade as soon as they can.

  7. Avatar photo NE555 says:

    Netgem need to be careful what they’re saying here.

    If they’re arguing that people in rural areas need gigabit broadband primarily to consume streaming content, then the government could turn around and say: why should the government pay, just so that the streaming services can sell more streams? Let the streaming services themselves pay for the network upgrades. Or let the customers buy DVDs.

    The reality of course is different: a decent work-from-home or learn-from-home experience these days involves substantial web content and two-way video calling.

    1. Avatar photo Spurple says:

      Why should the government build roads so that haulage companies can haul?

      Because that’s the government’s job, to provide the shared infrastructure that citizens need to lead their lives, even if some of those citizens happen to run haulage companies

  8. Avatar photo Mr Fox says:

    Sure. “Rural Areas”. I’m a few miles from Manchester in the eastern area, a part called Tameside and Openreach just announced plans last month to do FTTP in 2024/2025 for our area.

    I have no choice but to move or wait because there’s no cable on our relatively new build estate and nobody at the builder thought 5 years ago to request a fibre hookup to our location and ITS Broadband (who are in the area) never bothered to respond to a request for service either despite their network supplying a neighbouring business to my address.

    FTTC at 65/15 is the best I can get for now. It’s fine, but the upstream is a pain sometimes when uploading video.

  9. Avatar photo Peter says:

    The conclusion was that here is that faster broadband speeds and a mix of free and premium streaming services as part of this package were an appealing option for households, particularly in rural areas.

    Netgem TV services are available alongside broadband plans from several ISPs across the rural UK, and this is a key area of expansion for the company.

    They currently have partnerships with UK companies, in rural areas, including:

    Origin Broadband
    Community Fibre
    Pure Fibre
    Pure Telecom
    Pure Broadband
    Gigaclear
    Prime Fibre
    WightFibre
    Voneus

  10. Avatar photo Phill says:

    To remember:

    27/04/2021 – Rival Broadband ISPs May Scoop 4 Million UK Customers by 2025

    “Alternative Networks (AltNet) and “Challenger ISPs” could gain up to 1 million additional UK customers by 2025, which would increase their market share to 14.5% (3.74 million customers) from 12.5% in 2021.”

    https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2021/04/rival-broadband-isps-may-scoop-4-million-uk-customers-by-2025.html

  11. Avatar photo Carl says:

    One complex issue here is that some aforementioned incumbent providers may use AltNets too, such as TalkTalk (CityFibre and Freedom Fibre), Zen (CityFibre) and Vodafone (CityFibre), while others may follow suit later.

    On top of that it’s very difficult to forecast what may happen to a study like this if, for example, some of those incumbents suddenly decided to foster a mass migration away from Openreach and on to one of the newer altnets, which must be considered as a serious possibility for further down the line.

  12. Avatar photo Brian says:

    Managed to get a single stream in SD on 3.0/0.3 ADSL, but if any other use took place it was stopped. Using 4G better, but still have glitches, no FTTC as too far from cabinet, may get FTTP via R100 in 6 to 12 months.

  13. Avatar photo The 'Real' Facts says:

    Everyone I speak to in rural areas already have Fibre.
    They are told their cabinet is Fibre enabled and call it FTTC.
    I get 2 Megabits, which I think is 10 times faster than Gigabit. Because Mega is way cooler than Giga.
    Seems strange that I cannot watch any streams without them buffering or stopping all the time.
    Maybe I am confused because the confusion caused by the telecoms companies and supported by ASA and Ofcom?

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Sky Broadband UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5530)
  2. BT (3518)
  3. Politics (2542)
  4. Openreach (2298)
  5. Business (2266)
  6. Building Digital UK (2247)
  7. FTTC (2045)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1977)
  9. Statistics (1790)
  10. 4G (1668)
  11. Virgin Media (1621)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1465)
  13. Fibre Optic (1396)
  14. Wireless Internet (1391)
  15. FTTH (1382)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon