Broadband ISP and network builder Upp has today informed ISPreview.co.uk that they’ve partnered with infrastructure developer Light Source to help support their £1bn project to rollout a new gigabit-capable Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) network to 1 million UK premises in Eastern England by 2025.
The initial rollout, which started last month (here), will target towns across Norfolk and Lincolnshire, with Stamford (Lincolnshire) and Diss (Norfolk) being the first to benefit. But at the time, it was unclear which civil engineering firms would be supporting their build or what other locations they might reach. Despite this, the initial build aims to cover 50 towns (c.300,000 homes) in the two counties by the end of 2022.
Some of our readers have since spotted engineers working for RKM Utilities, which when approached were found to be operating on behalf of Light Source and building for Upp, mostly around their first location of Stamford, as well as other locations, such as Bourne and Market Deeping (these have not yet been officially announced). Upp has now confirmed the partnership.
Upp has also employed some of their own local field engineers to carry out installations and maintenance, although they’ll still need to work with contractors in order to achieve their coverage targets (i.e. it takes a long time to properly train up a fibre engineer).
Eryl Stafford, Upp’s Chief Operations Officer, said:
“We are thrilled to be working with Light Source. We chose them because they strive for excellence in their delivery of FTTH infrastructure, but also align with Upp on so many of our values. There’s an exciting future ahead as we continue our roll-out alongside Light Source throughout the East of England.”
Steve Hill, MD of Light Source, said:
“The team at Light Source are delighted to secure this partnership. Upp have some very ambitious plans and we are privileged to be part of their journey to rapidly rollout fibre to communities and businesses.”
At present the operator’s first goal is to reach 30,000 premises by the end of 2021, which is admittedly a long way from their ambitious future targets, but for such a new provider it would still be impressive to reach that level in such a short space of time.
Upp are currently offering both a 300Mbps and 900Mbps (symmetric speeds) product at £40 and £60 per month, respectively, across 12 months of service. The first 3 months of service are free, as well as free setup and installation. You can also expect to receive a Linksys Velop Whole Home Intelligent Mesh WiFi 6 (AX4200) router, alongside UK support.
The biggest challenge for Upp is that they’ll be deploying into some of the same locations as rival operators, such as County Broadband and Lightspeed Broadband. Other operators, such as B4RN, Openreach and Virgin Media, are also operating in some of the same areas where Upp may end up targeting in the future.
Just one day i’d like to wake up to an announcement that an alt-net was setting up in my town, instead of topsmart-upon-bumbleweed and more places nobody ever heard of.
How is it all the little towns nobody knew existed are getting altnets while towns of hundreds of thousands have nothing ?
Thats very true in London where I live only Hyperoptic, Community Fibre, Virgin 02 and Openreach are rolling out Fibre.
Focus in Small towns is smallers broadband companies are focusing in that area as other big companies are not doing any works
I can assure you all the places mentioned in the article are quite well known, Stamford, Norfolk, Market Deeping and Bourne are all big towns in the area, nearly all of which have no VM and very little FTTP coverage. Alt-nets in these places are badly needed, many people in these towns have no choice but to have FTTC with poor speeds.
I can understand your frustration, but these towns here absolutely need the alt-nets to come in and build. I’ve been waiting years for FTTP to come from BT and it’s just not happened, stuck on a 26mbit FTTC connection (I know, it could be a lot worse) is really starting to show its age now with downloading and streaming. My frustration is where alt-nets are building in places that already have good FTTP or VM coverage.
Fortunately for me we’re moving to a place that already has FTTP as our current location isn’t likely to see it for a few more years yet. It’s just a waiting game sadly for anyone that wants it.
Oh look more AltNets and yet again all England
Openreach don’t help by laying towels by the pool and heading for breakfast attitude, announcing great swathes of England in Fibre First that they are going to build at sometime over the next 5 years which makes the altnets search out the lesser area in England not covered by Fibre First just in case Openreach start next week and not in 5 years time. Openreach should make their annual build programme locations public so if altnets can deliver full fibre quicker then they should be allowed to do so.
ORs build plans are public. They even state which ones are to begin within the next 3 months, which are in progress now etc. But as I have come to find out, 6 months into a build, I can’t find out any information from them about if we’ll be covered or not. We are in a GFast area and strangely everyone who isn’t has “Planned” status under WBC FTTP but we have nothing and “FTTP is not available” in our post-code locations.
Left out try dry for ORs failed GFast experiment, but I hear this is all random coincidence and not true.
So Ryan so correct me if im wrong but your complaining about a technology which you didnt have to fund or contribute to Gfast (assuming you have a Gfast service you will have something somewhere between 160 – 350 mgs) — you could not make it up
if you want FTTP you could could also fund it sure yest through a fibre on Demand (there are CP’s offering that
—
Fastman yes. I am complaining that they rolled out a technology, that I didn’t pay for , that failed miserably and now they don’t give us FTTP because we happen to be one of the areas they made this test and failed.
But if you think it’s personally reasonable and that people should not get FTTP because they got failed GFast then I don’t know what to think. Thankfully I don’t require your permission to complain.
And no your assumption on speed is wrong. It was slower than VDSL.
Where is this information to be found Ryan?