Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

War in Ukraine Casts Shadow Over Future OneWeb Satellite Launches UPDATE2

Wednesday, Mar 2nd, 2022 (8:20 am) - Score 1,752
oneweb_rocket_launch_from_russia_march_2021

Calls are growing for the UK Government to take action to stop OneWeb, a British-registered company where it holds a key £400m stake after helping to rescue it from bankruptcy in 2020 (alongside a consortium of investors), from using Russian rockets for future launches of OneWeb’s ultrafast low-latency broadband satellites.

OneWeb has already launched a total of 428 small c.150kg Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellites into space – orbiting at an altitude of around 1,200km – and their initial plan is to build a constellation of 648 (588 are needed for coverage – the rest are for redundancy), which is enough for a reasonable level of global coverage by around June 2022. The UK government also holds an ambition to add navigation and positioning features to the firm’s next generation satellites.

NOTE: OneWeb’s commercial service will initially serve parts of the UK, Alaska, Canada, Northern Europe, Greenland, Iceland, and the Arctic seas – albeit focused more on government, maritime, aviation and enterprise. Community connectivity for homes will come later, via partner ISPs like BT (here) and Eutelsat (KONNECT).

Some of those LEOs have been lifted to orbit aboard a Russian Soyuz rocket (carrying 36 satellites at a time) from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan and the next launch is due to take place on Friday. But this plan has now clashed with Russia’s horrific invasion of Ukraine and the massive global response to that (i.e. heavy sanctions and restrictions against Putin’s regime and wider Russia).

Yesterday the MP for Plymouth, Sutton and Devonport, Luke Pollard (Labour), said: “It is not right that UK-funded satellite launches are taking place in what is effectively a Russian-backed facility. I would also like to press him on whether our UK satellites could be launched from our European facilities in French Guyana, which would ensure that we keep control and that progress on that project was unhindered.”

The Chair of the Commons Business Select Committee, Darren Jones MP (Labour), has similarly written an Open Letter to the government that raises the same concerns.

A UK Government Spokesperson said (BBC News):

“It is right for questions to be raised about future space cooperation with Russia following the illegal invasion of Ukraine. We are monitoring the situation closely and engaging regularly with our partners, keeping next steps under review.”

The big challenge here is that Russian-owned entities have already been pre-paid for the remaining launches, and finding availability via alternative rockets is not a simple matter – there’s a long lead-time and rockets have to be specially adapted, which is slow and expensive work. Not to mention that the UK government’s stake in OneWeb, while still holding a golden share, is not the biggest and its influence may thus be on the wane.

Striking a balance between punishing Putin and limiting self-harm is never easy. If the government takes action to scrub the launches, then it would cause a significant delay to OneWeb’s plan and damage its many contractual supply and distribution agreements, which are essential for underpinning the company’s plan for commercial viability. Russia could then potentially also sell the spare launch capacity to somebody else, which admittedly might not be easy in the current climate.

As it stands, there are only a handful of launches left, and they’re all due to be lofted via Russian Soyuz vehicles. Awkward.

UPDATE 2:52pm

The Russian space agency, Roscosmos, has contacted OneWeb and its partner Arianespace to demand “comprehensive legally binding guarantees” that the LEO satellites will not be used for military purposes (BBC News). “If by 21:30 on March 4 we do not receive confirmation, the rocket will be removed from the launch pad and the satellites will be sent to the assembly and test building.”

The OneWeb contract has already been paid in full, but Roscosmos warned that without such a commitment: “This money, due to force majeure circumstances that have arisen as a result of the aggressive policy of the West and the sanctions that are applied against Russia, this money will remain in Russia.”

Russia’s space agency later demanded that the UK government withdraw its shareholding from the London-headquartered company, which is about as likely to happen as Putin converting his tanks into ice cream vans. As for the question of military purposes, defence and security has always been talked about alongside OneWeb, albeit seemingly more intended for future satellites (e.g. navigation features) rather than the first generation.

UPDATE 3rd March 2022

Perhaps unsurprisingly – “The Board of OneWeb has voted to suspend all launches from Baikonur,” said a spokesperson for the company (this covers all 6 remaining launches).

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Tags:
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
20 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Hungry Dog says:

    They won’t be lifting using Russian launchers any time soon. If ever again.

    https://www.gpsworld.com/eu-reacts-as-russia-severs-rocket-launch-relationship/

    So yeah Putin and co won’t be in a hurry to lift anything for the West – in fact there’s talk that Russia could escalate by taking out all GPS (and potentially Galileo) birds in a simultaneous strike to effectively “blind” us.

    They don’t need a thermonuclear strike to cause utter havoc.

    https://www.gpsworld.com/when-will-russia-attack-gps-interview-with-former-cia-analyst-george-bebee/

    1. Avatar photo John says:

      That article is now about the Russians putting out of the Kourou spaceport in French Guiana in retaliation to EU sanctions.
      None of the One-Web launches were scheduled from the Kourou spaceport.

      A friendly reminder that the UK is also no longer in the EU.
      The vast majority of EU sanctions on Russia do not include or affect the UK.

      If the launches have been paid for then it only benefits Russia if One-Web were to cancel its future launches.

      A simple prediction from me… They will launch on a Russian Soyuz just as planned.

    2. Avatar photo Hungry Dog says:

      John – The last launch in February was actually from Kourou with Arianespace

      https://oneweb.net/launches

      It’s highly unlikely they’ll abort the Friday launch now. Especially given that 36 birds are rolling out to the launch pad today. Better that they get them up than keep them in Russian control.

      However it’s hugely doubtful if OneWeb will continue their relationship beyond this launch with Roscosmos given the current state of affairs and given the major shareholding the UK government has in OneWeb

    3. Avatar photo Hungry Dog says:

      Unsurprisingly events have turned in the last few hours. Given the nature of the beast (literally), Russia have moved first to take the initiative.

      I reckon they’ll now claim these OneWeb birds are “instruments of western military aggression” or some such tosh, abort the launch, keep the satellites (and the money paid to launch them)…and call our bluff.

  2. Avatar photo Jez says:

    Could buy a ride on a Falcon 9?! Polar injection outta Vandenberg.

    1. Avatar photo Hungry Dog says:

      Indeed. SpaceX have just had their launcher market share (and potentially asking price) increased dramatically overnight.

      With mods, the Starlink fleet is also an option should traditional military run GPS come under threat of attack

      https://www.space.com/spacex-starlink-gps-navigation

  3. Avatar photo John says:

    Why does the govt have a stake in a private company?? Why does taxpayer money have to be squandered when they can just ease regulation for an actual viable Starlink?

    1. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      The political side suggests it was a way to balance against the loss of leaving the Galileo system (i.e. cheaper than building their own GPS style solution from scratch). But to be fair, if the UK government were to sell their stake today, then it would be worth significantly more than they paid for it (ofc this may be impacted by the current situation).

    2. Avatar photo spurple says:

      Because it has potential military applications in imaging and navigation, and any sensible country that wants to keep its citizens safe would find those capabilities very useful in times of war, however remote you may think the risk is.

    3. Avatar photo HR2Res says:

      Politics is most definitely why.

      The reason was Brexit and the UK Government not wanting to go through the necessary hoops to remain part of Galileo. It was cheaper to but into a bankrupt company looking for cash than to start from scratch to replicate Galileo, which IIRC was the original Boris intention.

  4. Avatar photo Phil says:

    Putin are useless cowardly war crime ever

  5. Avatar photo DaGrifter says:

    Looks like Russia is now demanding the UK sell it’s share in Oneweb

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-60587154

    1. Avatar photo Gary H says:

      Hmm whatever, they can demand all they want.

  6. Avatar photo - says:

    Not ideal. Surely best to sign a legal agreement under duress now if it gets them launched and re-neg on it if necessary later. At the end of the day, what are they going to do, that is not a nuke launching issue. They’re the ones acting against every single basic commercial, legal and moral principle going.

    1. Avatar photo Gary H says:

      Totally, Agree they wont be used in the Ukraine conflict , then once they’re launched do whatever the hell we want with them.

  7. Avatar photo Gary H says:

    Bit weird, I’ve read articles today calling for the cancellation of the launch due to the Ukraine situation. Realistically mind you the launch is already paid for and what’s the better alternative, go ahead with the launch and get the sats in orbit or cancel it and leave the sats on earth at a Russian launch site !

    Launch the rocket and get the sats in orbit,

    1. Avatar photo Hungry Dog says:

      Those birds won’t be going up on Friday. They’ll be kept “hostage” for the foreseeable future by the Russians and probably eventually destroyed in some terrible “accident” no doubt. Together of course with any monies paid to them.

      It’s unlikely that OneWeb will have any legal or financial claim over Arianespace either for this debacle…it will be deemed an act of war.

    2. Avatar photo BjoernD says:

      Oneweb could get the money back by seizing some of the frozen funds from the Russian Central Bank.

  8. Avatar photo HR2Res says:

    The BBC now reporting that “The board of OneWeb, which is headquartered in west London, voted on Thursday morning to suspend all future launches from Baikonur”

Comments are closed

Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5515)
  2. BT (3514)
  3. Politics (2537)
  4. Openreach (2297)
  5. Business (2262)
  6. Building Digital UK (2244)
  7. FTTC (2043)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1973)
  9. Statistics (1788)
  10. 4G (1664)
  11. Virgin Media (1619)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1461)
  13. Fibre Optic (1395)
  14. Wireless Internet (1389)
  15. FTTH (1381)

Helpful ISP Guides and Tips

Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon