A new study from Broadband Genie (BG) has analysed 265,000 consumer speed tests and found the top slowest and fastest ten streets for broadband in the UK. For example, Morriston Close in Watford (London) comes out as the slowest street, with an average download speed of 0.6Mbps, but this is only half of the story.
According to Ofcom’s latest data (here), some 52% (15.4m) of UK homes are currently within reach of a Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) network (up from 48% in Jan 2023) and this rises to 75% for gigabit-capable networks (up from 73%). Similarly, some 97% of premises should be within reach of a fixed “superfast broadband” (30Mbps+) network.
However, the new study, which seems to clone what Uswitch often does, is based on consumer speedtests. This is a problem because such reports don’t correctly reflect the underlying availability of faster networks and are thus more a reflection of consumer take-up. The report does acknowledge this and highlights how Morriston Close – supposedly the UK’s slowest street – is also covered by Virgin Media’s 1Gbps capable broadband network (i.e. none of those who ran tests had taken that).
In fact, BG notes that all of the 10 slowest streets listed below have access to speeds of at least 30Mbps and 8 out of 10 even have access to speeds of 300Mbps+. Only Wade Court, Cheltenham and Cefn Road, Bridgend (Wales) don’t have access to speeds above 300Mbps. Suffice to say, consumer awareness and adoption of faster packages remains a key issue.
In other cases, consumers may be aware that a faster service exists, but they have simply chosen not to upgrade due to various issues, such as the potentially higher price, lack of support for the new network by their existing ISP, fear of switching, being stuck in a long contract term or a simple lack of need / desire for anything faster.
Speed test based like this can also be influenced by other factors, such as poor home wiring, the user’s choice of package (e.g. 1Gbps could be available, but people may pick a slower tier to save money), local (home) network congestion and slow WiFi performance etc. In short, take these results with a big pinch of salt and remember, the slowest streets are the ones that cannot get a viable broadband service and thus won’t appear in these studies.
Table: Slowest streets for broadband in the UK
Rank | Street | Download Speed (Mbps) |
1 | Morriston Close, Watford | 0.6 |
2 | Wade Court, Cheltenham | 1.2 |
3 | Leazes Lane, Bishop Auckland | 1.38 |
4 | Borstal Street, Rochester | 1.39 |
5 | Rocks Lane, London | 1.42 |
6 | Cefn Road, Bridgend | 1.43 |
7 | Mersea Road, Colchester | 1.53 |
8 | Hawthornvale, Edinburgh | 1.57 |
9 | Hollin Drive, Wakefield | 1.58 |
10 | Glebe Avenue, Braintree | 1.70 |
Table: Fastest streets for broadband in the UK
Rank | Street | Download Speed (Mbps) |
1 | Meadway, Northampton | 896.30 |
2 | Rolvenden Grove, Milton Keynes | 711.64 |
3 | Colville Street, London | 626.61 |
4 | Nicholas Meadow, Callington | 619.82 |
5 | North Road East, Wingate | 608.80 |
6 | Chestnut Avenue, Chesham | 603.90 |
7 | Town Street, Pudsey | 594.04 |
8 | Amethyst Road, Christchurch | 587.17 |
9 | Lumsdale Crescent, Matlock | 583.73 |
10 | Ridge Green, Redhill | 569.70 |
For streets to qualify for the study, postcodes needed to have the following criteria:
A minimum of three speed tests from three unique IP addresses.
Speed tests are from a commercial internet service provider.
The test is from a fixed-line internet connection.
At least 10 residential properties required at a postcode.
That’s £50k knocked off the market value of houses in those roads!
I’d love to know how you came up with that number
Haha was thinking the same… I think it might be a certain demographic living there who don’t really care about broadband
Humour is wasted upon the dull.
Can you explain the joke?
Says something dumb = “It’s just a joke bro”
With my poor speeds, at least I have fast 5G speeds to compensate. Hope those living in the streets listed have something similar.
Edit – Really bizarre that they have the option but have not opted to upgrade
It would be nice to include my street as we cant even get 1mb speed.
A quick check reveals Openreach full fibre is available in Watford
Yes according to BIDB that street has BT FTTP, VirginMedia HFC, and Lit Fibre.
Seems the street is just full of luddites who don’t care about upgrading their crap ADSL lines.
Just because the data says an area is served by a particular network, doesn’t mean that it is. In theory we can get Virgin Media in our street. But when your talk to them, they (eventually) tell you that the cost to connect a property is over their allowed budget.
So true. Trooli have enabled my street but only half of one side. My street shows as fiber enabled on bidb but 75% can’t get it (including me even though they use a access port at the end of my drive to wire up some of the other houses!)
It’s a postcode lottery that misses the detail.
Exactly that. My street is “served” by Virgin Media but they won’t connect up 9 properties on my road.
Looking at street view of Hollin Drive in Wakefield and knowing the area nearby it has VM in the area so the BT lines must be shocking in the area and be the resulting speedtests carried out
On Youfibre 2k is 2k sub £50
This kind of reporting is so damaging to the whole digital connectivity conversation. As this article shows, these supposedly “slowest streets for broadband” actually have access to superfast, and even ultrafast broadband, but either there have been faults (causing residents to speed test), or residents are not getting to connected to what’s available (by choice or because of lack of awareness). This “study” is manipulating the data for shock and awe. Whilst in reality, there are rural parts of this country (and I’m in one in Scotland), where whole postal regions cant get superfast broadband, let alone ultrafast or gigabit. Thats where the challenges lie, and thats where further investment is needed. Studies like this just divert attention from where the real infrastructure issues are.