Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Macquarie Allegedly Mulls Sale or Merger of Broadband ISP KCOM

Monday, Apr 22nd, 2024 (7:37 am) - Score 3,560
KCOM-Engineer-Vans-on-Lane

Australian investment group Macquarie has reportedly placed broadband ISP and full fibre network operator KCOM, which is the dominant operator in Hull and is also expanding further out into East Yorkshire and Lincolnshire in England, under strategic review. The move could potentially result in a sale or merger of the business.

In case anybody has forgotten. Macquarie Infrastructure (MIRA / MEIF 6 Fibre), following a fierce bidding war with the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS), finalised their £627m acquisition of Hull and East Riding’s incumbent broadband operator KCOM in August 2019 (here).

NOTE: KCOM currently aims to expand their full fibre network to 350,000 premises, which would be up from their current level of 297,000 premises passed (Mar 2023). The operator is home to around 139,000 broadband customers.

At the time, KCOM had only just finished its £85mLightstream” project (here), which made their gigabit speed Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) broadband network available to nearly all of their addressable network area (195,000 premises). But in 2020 they began a large £100m network expansion into more competitive areas (here), which was followed in 2022 by a second £100m fibre expansion and copper upgrade programme (here).

The latest development, according to the Telegraph (credits to Carl for spotting), is that Macquarie has allegedly appointed advisory-focused investment bank PJT Partners to conduct a strategic review of KCOM’s business. The speculation is that this move could potentially result in a sale or merger of the business with a rival operator, although such a proposition seems likely to be much more challenging this time around.

The original deal came at a time of low interest rates and easier access to funding, while the situation today is the opposite and the market (infrastructure level) is also much more competitive than in 2019. Not to mention that KCOM has since sold off some parts of its business (here) and is coming under pressure to grant rivals more access to run new fibre via their network (here). Suffice to say that KCOM may struggle to attract the same sort of money as they did five years ago.

On the other hand, growing network operators like CityFibre and nexfibre (Virgin Media O2) are currently looking to help boost their reach through consolidation and neither have any significant overbuild with KCOM. On top of that, KCOM delivered its first pre-tax profit in the year to the end of March 2023 (current earnings are said to be around £50m), which is something that a lot of alternative networks are still some distance from achieving.

In addition, the investment environment may soon start to improve once interest rates drop, although it will take time to move away from the current peaks. In any case, we probably won’t hear much more on this until later in the year, after the completion of the strategic review.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
14 Responses
  1. Avatar photo Ed says:

    Openreach won’t buy them – it’d mean BT actually spending money.

    1. Avatar photo Tyler says:

      Yeah, funny you are

    2. Avatar photo Bob says:

      Completion rules make BT buying them unlikely

    3. Avatar photo XGS says:

      Given BT are the incumbent everywhere bar Hull I can’t see competition being an issue. They’d probably want to dispose of the KCom build in areas BT are incumbent anyway, not that it really reduces competition significantly given the number of other operators. Beyond that no real issue.

    4. Mark-Jackson Mark Jackson says:

      Historically, BT/OR have generally stayed away from acquiring rival infrastructure providers, unless there really is no alternative (e.g. Digital Region). Not to mention some complex history between BT and KCOM in Hull. So my money would be on them not getting ‘seriously’ involved in bidding (though they may still express an interest for interests sake), but you never know. For now, CityFibre and nexibre seem like the more obvious choices.

    5. Avatar photo Ivor says:

      the same argument applies to KCOM as applies to the altnets, in regard to an Openreach bailout – they’ve built their network to a different standard, using different vendors, and there would be considerable integration and ongoing maintenance costs.

      I’d imagine BT are quite happy covering the rest of the country. If they really wanted to be a challenger in Hull, they could.

  2. Avatar photo Colin says:

    Why not just merge with Voneus?

  3. Avatar photo Anonymous says:

    KCOM appear to have been offloading some of their IPv4 blocks as well

    1. Avatar photo Matt says:

      Likely makes the profit look good in prep for sale if they’re not using them 🙂

      Have they had redundancies recently? I can’t find anything but usually PE would do things like prevent hiring, rather than redundancies if they’re lining up a sale as its far less obvious it’s happening.

  4. Avatar photo Jimmy says:

    Internally, this was a worst kept secret since min January. There were at least two waves of redundancies / people not getting FTC extensions since then. Fibre expansion was put on hold, capital expenditure cut to bare minimum. Even critical end of life stuff isn’t getting done. So the company made very little effort to try and hide it.

    KCOM has recently hired a lot of people from TalkTalk, and trying to be best buddies with the Execs there. Just sayin’.

    1. Avatar photo WasTheretoo says:

      Or Quickline as a merger.. perhaps then you get a lot of the ex-KCOm staff back 🙂 including the MD.

    2. Avatar photo XGS says:

      TalkTalk can’t afford KCom and it would be a really weird move for them to get involved. KCom own infrastructure, TalkTalk’s only real asset is their customer base. TalkTalk briefly tried building an access network and quickly sold it.

      Not impossible of course, but TalkTalk would bring no value to KCom and KCom none to TalkTalk.

      KCom have, what, about 170,000 premises where they are the incumbent and regulated alongside upwards of 130,000 where they are an alternative network. Their uptake in the 170,000 premises is insanely high due to cost and issues with competing with them so that’s decent, no idea how they are doing in the 130,000+ outside there but those are going to have to be priced pretty keenly: Nexfibre could build that in a couple of months at current pace. The 170,000 where they basically own the market are valuable but come with a lot of complications given the regulation.

      The regulation is a major, major stumbling block to an altnet acquiring them. Given part of the reason Nexfibre exists is to try and avoid VMO2 being regulated more strongly Nexfibre acquiring KCom seems a stretch. CityFibre don’t have the resources so would have to use shares to acquire and would they want the regulatory burden either?

      Haven’t a clue. Not sure anyone currently in the altnet market or BT Group would want them, might end up in a pension or investment fund again once Macquarie have finished the asset stripping and efficiency drives to increase perceived value.

    3. Avatar photo XGS says:

      My error, KCom are incumbent in about 190,000 premises with 110,000+ where they are the altnet.

  5. Avatar photo Anon KCOM customer says:

    Kcom show a profit from previous years although this year many customers are negotiating discounts and locking into new contracts for two years as part of the discount deal.

    Discounts are often £25 per month/half price.

    There is often a long call queue for customer services/retentions as so many are calling.

    Kcom revenue must be dropping as more customers phone to negotiate discounts or cancel and move to new competitors.

    In about two years these new discounted contracts will have ended and MS3 and Connexin will have completed build so customers will have a good choice.

    Installation of competitors poles has been delayed in some areas while negotiations take place which gives Kcom more time to get people locked into new Kcom contracts.

    Interesting times ahead for the residents of Hull and East Yorkshire.

    Lets hope whoever buys Kcom has more competitive pricing and ideally is a wholesale provider.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Comment moderation is enabled. Your comment may take some time to appear.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching or random moderation checks by the anti-spam system.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.

NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.

NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £26.00
132Mbps
Gift: None
Shell Energy UK ISP Logo
Shell Energy £26.99
109Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £27.99
145Mbps
Gift: None
Zen Internet UK ISP Logo
Zen Internet £28.00 - 35.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
YouFibre UK ISP Logo
YouFibre £19.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
BeFibre UK ISP Logo
BeFibre £21.00
150Mbps
Gift: £25 Love2Shop Card
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
The Top 15 Category Tags
  1. FTTP (5556)
  2. BT (3521)
  3. Politics (2545)
  4. Openreach (2306)
  5. Business (2272)
  6. Building Digital UK (2248)
  7. FTTC (2049)
  8. Mobile Broadband (1981)
  9. Statistics (1791)
  10. 4G (1673)
  11. Virgin Media (1627)
  12. Ofcom Regulation (1469)
  13. Fibre Optic (1398)
  14. Wireless Internet (1395)
  15. FTTH (1382)
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon