X-Fibre’s New FTTP Broadband Network Goes Live in Surrey UK
Network operator X-Fibre, which is exclusively supported by UK broadband ISP Shere Internet (vertically integrated), has announced that their new self-financed Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) network build recently started to go live in the Surrey Hills area of England.
Just to recap. X-Fibre is a company that previously focused on building full fibre networks for other operators (i.e. acting as a civil engineering contractor), such as for F&W Networks and Box Broadband (CommunityFibre) in Cranleigh during 2021. The following year they also installed about 70km of fibre for ITS Technology in Birmingham and then a few villages for Quickline in Yorkshire.
However, last year we noted (here) that the company had pivoted to focus all their energy on their own self-financed build, which highlighted an aspiration to “surpass” 10,000 homes across parts of Surrey, West Sussex, and Hampshire in England “within the next five years” (i.e. by 2028). But at the time there wasn’t a lot of information available.
The operator’s Director, Leroy Patterson, has now informed ISPreview that they have initially been focusing their own-build efforts on the Surrey Hills area. As a result of that, their network is now said to be live for customers in Bramley, Wonersh, Shalford, Chilworth, Aldbury, Blackheath, Shere, Gomshall, Burrows cross and Abinger Hammer.
X-Fibre has also approached the Government’s Building Digital UK (BDUK) agency for support with funding to help them serve more areas in 2024, although Leroy added that the postcode checker “currently covers nearly 4,000 UPRNS [premises] ready for service.”
Residential customers in related areas can sign-up, via Shere Internet, from £49.99 per month for their one and only 1Gbps broadband package with free installation on a 24-month term (the website incorrectly describes this as “GB” for GigaBytes, rather than “Gb” for Gigabits).
Subscribers can also choose a monthly rolling plan for the same price, except you’ll then have to pay £99 for the one-off installation. But we do think they are overlooking the entry-level market (users who only need a basic service) by seemingly failing to offer a slower and cheaper tier.
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook and Linkedin.
« Broadband ISP Zen Internet Tops 200,000 UK Subscribers
ISP John Lewis Broadband to Finally Close its UK Service »
Leave a Reply
Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message. By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your comment content, display name, IP, email and / or website details in our database, for as long as the post remains live.
Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
NOTE 1: Sometimes your comment might not appear immediately due to site cache (this is cleared every few hours) or it may be caught by automated moderation / anti-spam.
NOTE 2: Comments that break our rules, spam, troll or post via known fake IP/proxy servers may be blocked or removed.
Latest UK ISP News
- FTTP (5540)
- BT (3518)
- Politics (2543)
- Openreach (2300)
- Business (2268)
- Building Digital UK (2248)
- FTTC (2045)
- Mobile Broadband (1979)
- Statistics (1790)
- 4G (1670)
- Virgin Media (1625)
- Ofcom Regulation (1467)
- Fibre Optic (1396)
- Wireless Internet (1393)
- FTTH (1382)
“ But we do think they are overlooking the entry-level market (users who only need a basic service) by seemingly failing to offer a slower and cheaper tier.”
Having spent a lot of time in the Surrey parts I suspect many of their potential customers are well heeled enough to not notice £49 a month.
If you were a network you could make the argument that there’s none or little cost difference to the network no matter what speed the customer is on thereby by only having 1 tier simplifies your administration.
I’m sure if ISP’s thought could get away with it they’d be charging per Gigabyte of data used rather than by speed of connection.
The alternative in most of those villages is lower tier vDSL at around £40 pcm for 20Mbps. £50 for 900 is absolutely worth every penny. A great team and I am a very happy customer.