Home
 » ISP News » 
Sponsored Links

Ofcom UK Open Second Investigation into IX Wireless’ Broadband Poles

Wednesday, Sep 17th, 2025 (10:13 am) - Score 4,000
IX-Wireless-6Gi-UK-Broadband-Network-Diagram

The UK telecoms regulator, Ofcom, has today opened a second investigation into wireless broadband operator IX Wireless (supported by ISP 6Gi / Opus Broadband). The probe will examine whether the provider failed in its duty to ensure that its overhead lines were at the correct height and that they complied with rules around the inspection and maintenance of infrastructure.

Just to recap. IX Wireless, which holds an aspiration to cover 250,000 UK premises with their new network (here), is currently building their hybrid fibre and wireless broadband network across several towns in the North West of England, such as Blackburn with Darwen, Burnley, Nelson, Accrington, Thornton-Cleveleys, Fleetwood, Blackpool, Tameside and Oldham etc.

However, the “up to” 15-metre-high metal poles (masts) that they build don’t always go down well with residents in all of the areas where they build (some people often highlight their negative visual appearance), although in being a wireless service they only need to deploy a smaller number in order to cover a wide area.

Advertisement

Suffice to say that IX Wireless has sometimes attracted complaints, which in May 2025 resulted in Ofcom launching an investigation (here) into a single deployment of an IXW pole in Rochdale (installed during 2023). The probe is currently examining whether or not the operator correctly considered the need to “minimise the impact on the visual amenity” of nearby properties during their installation.

The bad news today is that Ofcom has opened a second investigation into the same network operator, albeit for a different reason. The new probe will look at whether IX Wireless has complied with requirements to ensure that lines installed over the carriageway of a maintainable highway are placed at least 5.5 metres above the surface of the road.

The regulator is also looking at compliance with rules around the inspection and maintenance of infrastructure to ensure it does not cause damage or injury.

Ofcom Statement (CW/01322/09/25)

Ofcom has today opened an investigation into IX Wireless’ compliance with its obligations under the Electronic Communications Code (Conditions and Restrictions) Regulations 2003/2533 (as amended) (‘the Regulations’).

The Electronic Communications Code is designed to facilitate the installation and maintenance of electronic communications networks across the United Kingdom. IX Wireless, as a designated “Code Operator”, benefits from certain rights under the Code. But when exercising these rights, Code Operators are also subject to conditions and restrictions. Among other obligations, IX Wireless is required to comply with the Regulations, including requirements to:

➤ ensure that any lines installed over the carriageway of a maintainable highway or, in Scotland, a public road are placed at least 5.5 metres above the surface of the highway or road (Regulation 4(2)(a)); and

➤ inspect and maintain his electronic communications apparatus, other than apparatus installed underground or inside a building or other permanent structure, so as to ensure that it will not cause injury to any person or damage to property (Regulation 10(1)).

Where Ofcom has reasonable grounds for believing that a contravention of the conditions and restrictions imposed by the Regulations has occurred or is occurring, Ofcom may take enforcement action under section 110 of the Communications Act 2003.

Ofcom’s investigation will examine whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that IX Wireless failed to comply with Regulation 4(2)(a) and/or Regulation 10(1), relating to the height of cable lines and to the inspection and maintenance of its apparatus.

We will gather further information and publish an update to our investigation in due course.

Ofcom’s powers in this area remain quite limited (here) and investigations like this often take a long time to run their course (they launched an investigation of Brsk’s deployment of poles in Sept 2024 and imposed a £14k fine in July 2025 – here), which suggests that we’ll probably have to wait until around mid-2026 to see the outcome of this one too.

Advertisement

Network operators will no doubt be watching the regulator’s investigations very closely, since such things always have the potential to set new precedents for their own deployments of similar infrastructure. On the other hand, IXW’s large metal poles/masts are visually quite different, as well as being much larger, than your typical c.9 metre high wooden telegraph / telecoms poles (i.e. any ruling may not be directly translatable to the latter).

Finally, it’s worth noting that the ISPA and INCA this year published new ‘Best Practice Guidance’ for gigabit broadband operators that are building new poles as part of their UK network expansions. The guidance aims to support the Government’s goal of “ending the deployment of unnecessary telegraph poles” (here), not least by requiring providers to engage more closely with communities before they build (details here).

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
11 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Nada89 says:

    There a very dodgy company. Just looking into thier past tell you everything you need to know.

  2. Avatar photo For the love of FTTP says:

    I was previously with 6GI due to lack of FTTP in my area. I think I was with them for about 6 months in total before the ombudsman agreed that I should be able to leave my contract at no charge.
    The service was terrible and the “tech team” did not help me at all

  3. Avatar photo ex-techie says:

    Good. They’re a bunch of charlitains who lie about planning permission for their masts. If you look, the masts are empty on the planning docs, plus the technology is often deployed in areas which already have extensive cable coverage from VM AND FTTP from altnets AND Openreach and decent phone signal for 4g/5g. They also are leagues behind with the speed, if it works properly to begin with. BTW Mark, Tameside is more than one town!

    1. Avatar photo Rik says:

      I wouldn’t touch them with a 15 metre pole!

      They’re the same company that was behind Supanet and Time Computers. Still registered overseas, too.

  4. Avatar photo eric farquhar says:

    now apply that investigation to any Openreach wooden 9mtr pole in any town, where there are residents and where they destroy the area with Victorian wooden technology for AI systems in 2025.

  5. Avatar photo Jason says:

    Poles should be a last resort not the primary

  6. Avatar photo Carlos says:

    Just rip it all out.

    No-one wants a technology that’s inferior to what’s already available (VM & Openreach in my area for example).

  7. Avatar photo Adam says:

    I think the more important aspect to this, as ex-techie says, is that there is already adequate coverage in a lot of the areas this company deploys lines.

    They should be taken down, as the service provided is technically inferior to FTTP… this “air fibre” marketing should be criminal.

  8. Avatar photo PK says:

    This is only going to get worse. They have put up many poles and cables that are not being used, never will be, therefore they are not being maintained. They will not want to take them down as they are classed as assets on their balance sheet. In the meantime the risk to communities keeps increasing.

  9. Avatar photo Youl Operan says:

    they donated over 130k to MPs in their build areas, I assume their game is to take government internet grants and then roll out in easy areas and know they won’t get customers. They rolled out in an area with both openreach fttp as well as new virgin fttp (not old coax) and the area is well covered by 5G.

  10. Avatar photo Linda Sizemore says:

    This was never about better broadband, great that OFCOM are rolling up their sleeves. Ultimately this company and the individuals involved need to be fully investigated by the police.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real persons legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: None
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £24.99
145Mbps
Gift: £140 Reward Card
NOW UK ISP Logo
NOW £25.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £8.50 - 17.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
ASDA Mobile UK ISP Logo
ASDA Mobile £19.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Three UK ISP Logo
Three £20.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £17.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £18.00
150Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Beebu UK ISP Logo
Beebu £23.00
100 - 160Mbps
Gift: None
Hey! Broadband UK ISP Logo
150Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact
Mastodon