
The Broadband Forum has published a new technical report that outlines how multiple tenants and apartments (MDU – Multi-Dwelling Units) could receive gigabit broadband connectivity through a single 5G based Fixed Wireless Access (FWA) network connection, not least by reusing some of the building’s existing infrastructure.
Sadly, not every large residential apartment building (MDU) can have a new fibre optic connection installed (yet), and using FWA solutions is often problematic due to issues of performance or coverage limitations for individual tenants inside such large and complex buildings. This is especially true once you get into the mmWave spectrum bands of 24-40GHz, which don’t penetrate well through walls and are needed for the best multi-gigabit service speeds.
One way around this is to install lots of external receiving equipment / antenna outside each individual apartment. But the wireless signal will often only be able to reach one or two sides of the building and the MDU will usually place tight restrictions on the use or placement of such equipment (issues of safety, power, cosmetics etc.).
Advertisement
The new specification seems to be promoting a hybrid approach, with FWA signals bringing the connection to a central point in the building and then the building’s existing property infrastructure (i.e. twisted pair, telephone wiring, or coaxial cabling – from the attic or basement of the building) being used to reach individual flats / apartments.
The project, which first began in 2023, has now defined the architecture and requirements to show how this would work via TR-507 and MR-516.
Christele Bouchat, Broadband Forum Network Architecture Work Area Co-Director, said:
“In the past, restrictions set by property owners or the design of existing MDU buildings have limited the possibilities for making high-capacity broadband services available to these subscribers. The latest specification addresses these limitations by allowing the installation of a high-performance 5G outdoor FWA system that can be shared by potentially dozens of tenants and connected through existing cabling already in the building.”
The idea of using existing cabling to distribute a broadband service within an MDU is nothing new, although such approaches often run into the limitations of such infrastructure at some point. In this case it’s a little bit hard to judge because we haven’t yet jumped from this specification to a commercially viable product and, at least for the UK, such an approach seems likely to be superseded by the existing deployment of full fibre (FTTP/B) networks.
Advertisement
Wait… So what you’re saying is us 5G to get backhaul then vdsl or similar to deliver service.. what a waste of money and time. If you’re going through all that effort and cost… (Vdsl converters aren’t mainstream or even that cheap)
Just stick in FTTP. It really isn’t that costly. Well Openreach may think so, but in reality it is not!
May as well just drop an EAD in and distribute that or use a 5G SA cell blasting at the block and give tenants a 5G router.
Honestly, people seem to re-invent the wheel and think they have a good idea just because it has 5G in their proposal.
Honestly I’m fed up with the same stories of ‘innovative’ approaches which are either a way to get government money or investors money. Both of who don’t have a practical clue how these things actually work…
Also, to throw another spanner in the works. Guaranteed Openreach will come along and say they own the cabling or just trash it when sending in contractors.
I do agree. In my area there is load of houses are all underground cable for FTTC. Now, Openreach throw in load of new poles (for FTTP) – oh wait! Why waste money on ugly poles as they do often go down in stormy bad weather to knock off FTTP. This is totally unacceptable! Surely they can do FTTP in underground but decided not to be, using FTTP over the poles is madness idea.
Dear Openreach if you are reading this, I will not accept any poles in my area, no thanks.