Home
 » ISP News, Key Developments » 
Sponsored Links

TOTSCo Set Plan to Improve Performance of Broadband and Phone Switching

Thursday, Mar 12th, 2026 (1:33 pm) - Score 1,080
fish-broadband-switching-between-wine-glasses-123RF-19893752

The One Touch Switching Company (TOTSCo), which is the industry-led company responsible for delivering Ofcom’s process – One Touch Switching (OTS) – for quicker and easier UK switching (migration) between home broadband and phone providers, has today set out details of how they plan to improve the system’s performance and monitoring.

The system, which first went live on 12th September 2024, remains a Gaining Provider Led (GPL) process, where the customer contacts their new (“gaining“) ISP to start and manage the process on their behalf. But after a bit of a bumpy start and some ongoing issues, the new system is already helping around 1.8 million consumers to switch ISP every year and is also in the process of being extended to business connections (here).

NOTE: Ofcom states that all communications providers switching a UK residential customer’s Internet Access Service and/or Number-based Interpersonal Communications Service, which is provided at a fixed location, are in scope of their OTS rules, and must follow the OTS process.

OTS has been in place for 18 months now and we believe it is working well for consumers and providers. However, as OTS continues to mature, we believe there are still opportunities for improvement,” said the latest update from TOTSCo.

Advertisement

As part of the new push, TOTSCo says they’ve identified several areas which could “lead to a poor switching experience and/or consumer harm” and are keen to help service providers improve these. First on the list is the need to improve their Hub match success rates (switch match success rates), which currently still average around 63% (i.e. some switch attempts fail first time around due to details that don’t match).

On top of that they’ve also identified problems where some switching messages accepted by the messaging Hub are “not successfully delivered because they either time out or are rejected by the recipient“, although this issue is said to be low in volume.

In addition, TOTSCo found some switch orders are not being responded to in a timely fashion, which may delay cessation of the old service and can sometimes also cause double billing issues between the gaining and losing ISPs (the OTS rules forbid this).

The fourth issue identified is that some internet and phone providers fail to respond when issues are raised with them (effectively flouting the rules and hoping Ofcom won’t take action) and this can, in turn, cause the issues to persist for longer.

Advertisement

TOTSCo’s Proposed Approach for Improvements

In response, we propose to take the following approach for TOTSCo’s areas of focus:

1. Improve and expand TOTSCo current performance and monitoring information

We will enhance the information we currently publish under ‘Residential Trends and Insights’ on our website and share more detail on M&I activities at our monthly Stakeholder Forum.

Additional information we intend to publish includes:

➤ Greater visibility of variation in match success rate e.g. anonymised top and bottom performers, quartiles, highest observed match success rate, and trend information.

➤ Exploration of a “customer” or “session” match rate, to better reflect the customer switching experience. As this data is held by providers, we will seek views on whether anonymised data could be shared.

2. Support individual providers

➤ Continue direct engagement with providers.

➤ Introduce Service Review Meetings to discuss performance and share best practice.

➤ Facilitate bilateral meetings with highest volume providers to improve the corresponding bilateral match-success rates.

3. Make a provider-specific report available

We will develop a monthly provider-specific report enabling providers to:

➤ Compare their gaining and losing match success rates against industry benchmarks

➤ Track trends over time

➤ Review failed messages and non-response metrics and compare against industry benchmarks.

4. Assess industry interest in outage notification approach

We also welcome industry views on outage notifications. The outage calendar is currently used by providers to report planned outages. We are keen to understand whether there are circumstances in which TOTSCo should proactively publish information about any unnotified outage of a provider’s OTS messaging system, e.g. where an outage exceeds a certain duration and/or where providers are unresponsive to TOTSCo’s requests for information.

TOTSCO said they’re “confident” that the proposed activities can be delivered within their existing budget, although they do warn that this “may change if the scope of our activities expands significantly“. For some smaller ISPs and resellers with low margins per connection, the cost of implementing TOTSCo can already be problematic.

The company plans to consult on all this until 7th April 2026, although it’s worth noting that they also identified some areas which need to be addressed, but where the issues appear to fall outside TOTSCo’s remit to tackle (i.e. in many cases these may be issues that Ofcom need to review and tackle directly). We’ve listed these areas below:

• Leakage – Providers are offering non-OTS switching journeys where a successful match cannot be obtained.

• Non-participation – Providers are not on the live directory and are therefore unable to offer OTS journeys.

• Quality and timeliness of switching information.

• Quality of contractual information.

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
8 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Retro says:

    I recently had a good experience with One Touch Switch when I went from Virgin Media to Sky. Sky were very good, as were CityFibre with their install communication. Virgin emailed all relevant end of service information to me. Sky sent the router, CityFibre installed the ONT and set up the router, Sky activated the line, and Virgin Media disconnected me the morning after and altered the billing so I only paid for the days I used in that month.

    All very smooth. No complaints.

  2. Avatar photo Martin says:

    I think Sky only support One Touch Switch from ISPs which use Openreach, I wonder how many other ISPs have similar restrictions.

    I’d also like to see some more reassurance that the old service won’t be cancelled until the new service is confirmed working, especially when switching underlying networks. The option to have an overlapping period would be nice.

    Perhaps an option similar to the STAC code for mobiles would work, some firm of no quibble no retentions cancellation process

    1. Avatar photo Retro says:

      Untrue. I was a Virgin Media cable broadband customer. I used OTS and Sky handled everything. I’m now on CityFibre.

  3. Avatar photo Switcher says:

    I switched from Virgin to EE via one touch switch.
    It failed to cease my service with Virgin even though Virgin had the notification. (The switch notice shows in the app) .I also had the impact of switching texts and emails.

    I was billed by Virgin the full out of contact price for 2 months even after contacting them many times as well as being billed by EE.
    Had to email CEO office to get it resolved.

    They still owe me £172 that is a credit sat on my closed account
    Been waiting 2 months for a cheque.

    Not sure who to blame for this. Virgin ? EE ? Or the OTS system.
    Clearly has some bugs to work out.

  4. Avatar photo JG says:

    I knew there has to be some sort of system for this, I can’t imagine if I switch from O2 to 3 they will ring each others indian call centre where incompetence is mandatory to arrange switch.

  5. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

    My brother used it to change from Talk Talk to Zzoomm and it worked okay, much to my surprise.
    Not sure if I would use it to switch from one network to another, but it worked for him

    1. Avatar photo Retro says:

      The OTS system was literally designed for people to switch between different networks. There was already a system in existence for people to switch between Openreach ISPs.

  6. Avatar photo CynicsRUs says:

    And what is the problem that leads to anyone wanting to switch…? Lets not tackle that but implement a unfinalised system at costs ultimately paid for by consumers, to tackle the symptom of excessive pricing, rather then prevent price gouging, maniplation, small print that does not work in the consumers interests, at the diktat of the occaisionally reactive ‘regulator’, amazingly efficient (not).
    SAD.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
200Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £23.00
100Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £23.99
145Mbps
Gift: £100 Reward Card
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £16.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £18.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
O2 UK ISP Logo
O2 £21.24
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £22.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £16.00
300Mbps
Gift: None
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
200Mbps
Gift: None
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Beebu UK ISP Logo
Beebu £23.00
100 - 160Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact