Home
 » ISP News » 

Assessing the Future Withdrawal of UK Mobile MMS Picture Messaging

Monday, Aug 10th, 2026 (12:01 am) - Score 2,920
Smartphone-chat-and-text-SMS-messages-uk-123rf-106949094

An important development recently happened in Germany as mobile operators switched off the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS), which meant that users would in future be limited to sending pictures, short videos and audio files to other mobile phone users via internet-based messaging platforms (RCS, WhatsApp, iMessage etc.). But this raises the question, when might the UK follow?

The commercial deployment of MMS started around 2002 and only really became popular alongside the introduction of 3G mobile services a year later, which were much better at being able to send such data over nascent mobile broadband connectivity. Unlike regular SMS (text messaging), MMS also allowed users to send media content like pictures.

NOTE: Three UK charges 55p per MMS on Pay Monthly plans if it is not included in your tariff allowance, while EE charges 98p, O2 some 87p and Vodafone 75p.

Despite this, MMS could be quite restrictive (character and file size limits etc.) and sending an individual message via the cellular network was often far from cheap. Even accidentally sending an emoji alongside your text message, which would often convert it to an MMS, could sometimes rack up quite a bill if such messaging wasn’t included in your plan (this caused plenty of annoyance).

Advertisement

However, the service quickly found itself competing for user attention with internet-based (IP) messaging platforms, which became much more viable as mobile data prices dropped. Services like RCS, WhatsApp, Facebook Messenger and so forth have grown significantly over the past decade or so and don’t suffer the same limitations. Suffice to say that MMS has largely been eclipsed by those IP-based platforms.

Dario Betti, CEO of the Mobile Ecosystem Forum (MEF), told ISPreview:

“UK mobile operators including Vodafone UK, O2 UK, EE and Three continue to support MMS, meaning that it is still available for certain consumer and enterprise use cases.

The UK has a strong CPaaS [Communications Platforms as a Service] ecosystem, advanced A2P [Application-to-Person] messaging market and also increasing adoption of RCS Business Messaging. This means that operators are likely to take a more commercially driven approach to any future migration from MMS. Germany’s experience gives us a useful case study which demonstrates both the opportunities and risks associated with retiring legacy messaging services.

For UK operators, the key lesson is not simply whether MMS should eventually be switched off, but whether the industry has built a sufficiently robust RCS, CPaaS and AI-powered messaging ecosystem to replace the reach, reliability and revenue that legacy services currently still provide.”

Crucially it’s unclear how many people still use MMS in the UK (personally I have only sent a single MMS in the last decade) and thus it’s difficult to gauge the real-world economic impact of its potential removal. ISPreview did contact EE, O2 and VodafoneThree to query what they thought about the change in Germany and when the UK might follow suit.

At the time of writing only O2 has responded. A spokesperson for the operator said they couldn’t rule out switching off MMS “one day in the future“, but they currently have “no active plans” to retire it. Regular readers will know that we always take any mention of “no plans” with a pinch of salt, as plans can and often do change, frequently at short notice. We suspect O2’s position will be the same for EE and VodafoneThree.

As for Germany, by the time mobile operators pulled the plug MMS usage had already plummeted by over 96% from its 2012 peak. German mobile users had already long abandoned the service. The operators that turned the service off also saved money on costly licensing fees, reduced backend maintenance, fewer customer support issues and so forth.

Advertisement

Share with Twitter
Share with Linkedin
Share with Facebook
Share with Reddit
Share with Pinterest
Mark-Jackson
By Mark Jackson
Mark is a professional technology writer, IT consultant and computer engineer from Dorset (England), he also founded ISPreview in 1999 and enjoys analysing the latest telecoms and broadband developments. Find me on X (Twitter), Mastodon, Facebook, BlueSky, Threads.net and .
Search ISP News
Search ISP Listings
Search ISP Reviews
Comments
19 Responses

Advertisement

  1. Avatar photo Retro says:

    I haven’t sent an MMS message for years. The only advantage of MMS is it doesn’t require mobile data to work. I think that’s a problem with RCS in general, and one they have yet to solve.

    1. Avatar photo dave says:

      MMS requires mobile data but not necessarily internet access.

    2. Avatar photo Retro says:

      Yes, quite. My mistake.

  2. Avatar photo Big Dave says:

    I’m amazed if anyone still uses MMS given the rip off prices charged. Hopefully as 2G and 3G gets shutdown and spectrum given over to 4G and above data connections will be available in most circumstances for Internet based messaging apps.

    1. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

      Smarty doesn’t charge for MMS and I should think the majority have MMS included with their packages. For people who still use SMS, may use MMS, for a start as it said above if they use Emojis, I just use the standard, smiley stuff. SMS still have a limit of 160 characters, so any more have to be converted into MMS. A friends phone, which is a dumb phone do notify if they go above 160 characters that it will be converted to MMS and charges may apply.

      I use SMS all the time, I don’t use the Google messages app because I don’t like it and if I did, I would disable RCS. I use Textra and currently is don’t support RCS.

      As Retro pointed out RCS need data to work and if your phone is in a week signal sport, it may not work, SMS is more reliable in that way.

      The thing I don’t like about RCS, is that it tells people you are typing. SMS does what I need and that is to send messages.

    2. Avatar photo GDS says:

      The only time I’ve sent a MMS in last few years, was by accident, when I sent a Imessage with image, phone lost data connection and accidently pressed the “send as text message” button…. 40p for a silly pic…

    3. Avatar photo Not quite so Bizzie Lizzie. says:

      @Ad47uk
      Vodafone, and at least some of its MVNOs, e.g. Lebara, allow concatenated SMS texts of up to 3 messages in length.
      Years ago, If I exceeded 435 chars, the message was automatically converted to MMS, these days it just fails to send, if greater than 3 SMSs in length.
      I thought that this was standard practice, but obviously not, unless Ad has some restriction set on his phone/account.
      Are the limits, for the various operators, published anywhere?
      Not that it matters very much, since virtually all of my messages are sent using Signal these days.

    4. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

      @ Not quite so Bizzie Lizzie. Are they concatenated SMS texts or are they converted to MMS? If they are concatenated SMS texts, then they will arrive at the other end in 2 or more parts I would think.
      i remember many years ago, that what used to happen, and sometimes the messages were not sent in the right order, that was many years ago, before 3G even.

      I have no restrictions on my phone, I did send myself along message a moment ago, it came up as SMS in my text App and not MMS, but it could class all plain text messages as SMS.

      I use SMS and will carry on doing so, it does what I need to do. There only other thing I use to send messages, but only to 2-3 people because I don’t want to give them my number is Facebook Messenger. Oh, maybe 4, but that is because, for some reason, he insists on using it, and yet I gave him my number to send text.
      I don’t think anyone I know uses Signal, but they may do. Most use WhatsApp.

  3. Avatar photo Name says:

    It was always expensive, usually not included in the plan, charged extra in roaming despite having allowance and the most important: clips/images were low resolution/quality even when viewed on the mobile screen. Please let it die.

  4. Avatar photo Roy says:

    The one use I’ve seen of MMS is group messaging where the group can’t (or doesn’t wish to) agree on a single OTT app for them all to use.

  5. Avatar photo Philip says:

    MMS was almost designed to result in unexpected extra charges.
    It should have been shut down long ago.

  6. Avatar photo Jazzy says:

    Only used it once by accident and never again. I am sure there was an option in my phone to disable them. I wasn’t being charged when whatsapp is free

  7. Avatar photo Paul Marsh says:

    AFAIK I have only ever sent one MMS and as others have said, that was a mistake!

    Is it possible to disable the ability to send MMS, either on my Android phone or by the network operator, (EE in my case), to prevent this?

  8. Avatar photo Just a thought says:

    It’s good to have a ‘standard’ rather than an App. that all your contacts have to install. I think if operators agree to support it, RCS would seem logical.

    MMS charges put me off using it years ago, but txt messages get through without worrying if someone has Signal, or WhatsApp or Messenger etc.

  9. Avatar photo Big_Dave says:

    @Ad47uk

    “The thing I don’t like about RCS, is that it tells people you are typing. SMS does what I need and that is to send messages”

    Which can be disabled…

    1. Avatar photo Ad47uk says:

      But not the other way, not when I looked anyway. I don’t want to know that people are typing. I should have put one of the things I don’t like.
      At the end of the day, the only reason RCS came into being been was to compete with WhatsApp, which, I think, is a bit strange. I suppose it saves people using a third-party app, they can carry on using Googles app instead.

      I know RCS is not supposed to be a Google thing, but they have pushed it, so they must be getting something out of it.

      If RCS was a thing to start with, then I would be using it and no doubt younger people may do so, that is if they don’t use WhatsApp. They would think SMS is restrictive, which it is, but that is why I like it.

      For me, I don’t see any need for anything different to SMS, I can send text and receive text, I can send a smiley thing or ever thumbs up if I need to. Sure for those who seem to want to share photos and videos of their lives then fine, but I am not one of them.
      I can understand if someone want to send a photo or a video of their kids doing something to a relative, certainly if they live miles away from each other. but as I said above, most people will use WhatsApp for that.

      The only time I will change to RCS is if I have no choice, but I am not convinced that is going to happen, not for many years anyway.

  10. Avatar photo Zuck-Free says:

    Inevitably MMS senders to me mistakenly think I have a WhatsApp account. I feel like I’ve fined them 55p to be allowed to send me a text or an email to log in to a web-page built with Netscape Navigator v0.1 to view a 240 pixel image.

  11. Avatar photo Mark Smith says:

    It’s caraway how much the operators charged for MMS messaging and how many people got charged inadvertently over the years.

  12. Avatar photo Rik says:

    At 30 to 50p a message, it’s always been a rip off. I can’t remember the last time I sent one. Even in the early days of camera phones it was cheaper to use GPRS to send an email with attachments instead of an SMS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

NOTE: Your comment may not appear instantly (it may take several hours) due to static caching and moderation checks by the anti-spam system. Please be patient. We will reject comments that spam, troll, post via known fake IP/proxy servers or fall foul of our Online Safety and Content Policy.
Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically)

Privacy Notice: Please note that news comments are anonymous, which means that we do NOT require you to enter any real personal details to post a message and display names can be almost anything you like (provided they do not contain offensive language or impersonate a real person's legal name). By clicking to submit a post you agree to storing your entries for comment content, display name, IP and email in our database, for as long as the post remains live.

Only the submitted name and comment will be displayed in public, while the rest will be kept private (we will never share this outside of ISPreview, regardless of whether the data is real or fake). This comment system uses submitted IP, email and website address data to spot abuse and spammers. All data is transferred via an encrypted (https secure) session.
Cheap BIG ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Youfibre UK ISP Logo
Youfibre £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Plusnet UK ISP Logo
Plusnet £22.99
145Mbps
Gift: £140 Reward Card
BT UK ISP Logo
BT £23.99
150Mbps
Gift: £110 BT Reward Card
Virgin Media UK ISP Logo
Virgin Media £23.99
132Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Cheap Unlimited Mobile SIMs
giffgaff UK ISP Logo
giffgaff £14.00
Contract: 18 Months
Data: Unlimited
iD Mobile UK ISP Logo
iD Mobile £15.00
Contract: 24 Months
Data: Unlimited
Talkmobile UK ISP Logo
Talkmobile £16.95
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Smarty UK ISP Logo
Smarty £17.00
Contract: 1 Month
Data: Unlimited
Sky UK ISP Logo
Sky £18.00
Contract: 12 Months
Data: Unlimited
Cheapest ISPs for 100Mbps+
Community Fibre UK ISP Logo
100Mbps
Gift: None
Gigaclear UK ISP Logo
Gigaclear £19.00
300Mbps
Gift:
toob UK ISP Logo
toob £19.50
150Mbps
Gift: None
Grain Connect UK ISP Logo
250Mbps
Gift: £25 Bill Credit
Zzoomm UK ISP Logo
Zzoomm £20.00
200Mbps
Gift: None
Large Availability | View All
Promotion
Sponsored

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms , Privacy and Cookie Policy , Links , Website Rules , Contact