Home » ISP News »

Official Government Response Shuns Lords UK Superfast Broadband Inquiry

Posted Wednesday, October 24th, 2012 (8:19 am) by Mark Jackson (Score 536)
fibre optic uk superfast broadband internet cables

The UK government’s Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) has released its official response to July’s controversial Lords Inquiry into the UK government’s superfast broadband strategy, which called for a more competitive national fibre optic network to be built. But anybody expecting to see big changes will be disappointed.

As expected the government’s response somewhat shunned the Lord’s vast array of often complex recommendations and warned that its demand for a national network of open access fibre optic lines delivered via Fibre-to-the-Premises (FTTP) technology would simply be too expensive.

The related idea of making people responsible for the potentially huge “final drop” connection cost of running fibre into their own homes was also perhaps correctly deemed to be too complex and expensive for “most householders” (especially in rural areas).

Government Response

It is not for Government to decide which technology is the most suitable, as it is likely that a mix of technologies will be needed in the UK, given the topography and commercial challenges faced in the more rural and remote areas of the UK. As the Committee recognises, delivering universal point to point Fibre to the Premise would be extremely costly – estimated at in excess of £25bn.”

The Lords demand for truly open access to Dark Fibre lines, which usually reference a high capacity fibre optic cable that has been laid by an operator but is not yet being fully utilised, was also somewhat unsurprisingly rejected. “Rather than expediting BDUK’s programme, mandating the provision of dark fibre is likely to impede progress,” said the report. The EU seems to disagree as it has called for tougher provisions to support Dark Fibre access, while the UK continues to adopt a more voluntary approach.

The government also rejected the Lords claim that it had become too “preoccupied with speed“, as opposed to focusing upon access and the need to create a “‘future proof’ national network which is built to last“. Never the less the full document repeatedly talks about specific service speeds and targets.

Government Response

Current policy is not built around precise speed targets. We have defined superfast broadband as a speed greater than 24 Mbps, in line with the definition adopted by Ofcom in a 2010 report and the BDUK Programme Delivery Model. That speed represented the limit of what was deliverable over copper lines using ADSL2 technology.

As for the many related competition and regulation concerns, most of the buck for this was passed right back to Ofcom, with the government adding that, “Ofcom’s existing duties and powers are sufficient to ensure that there are competitive retail and wholesale broadband access markets operating in the UK“. Some might disagree, others less so.

Overall nobody should expect any significant changes to emerge as a result of the Lords admittedly somewhat radical approach. The government appears to have rejected most of the ideas and put its own spin on others to make those reflect their existing policy. In fairness this was always likely to be the outcome, especially given the limited budget at hand and the lateness of their report. The analysis would have been more useful had it been conducted before BDUK began awarding contracts.

Perhaps a far more interesting development to keep an eye on is the EU’s forthcoming recommendation for a series of allegedly “minor changes” to the Broadband Delivery UK (BDUK) framework (here). Details on that should surface within the next couple of weeks and could have a noticeable impact on current policy.

Government Response to the House of Lords Report (PDF)
http://www.culture.gov.uk/images/publications/Gov_Response…pdf

Delicious
Add to Diigo
Add to Slashdot
Leave a Comment
6 Responses
  1. FibreFred

    Slapped down on pretty much everything, we knew the Lords reports was a shambles and the response just highlights that even more

  2. Sledgehammer

    So reading between the lines of the response by the government the status quo persists BT can do what it likes with FTTC, OFCOM and BDUK continue their downhill slide and we will end up with the biggest hotchpotch of “a high speed service” in the world.

    Smaller ISP’s will slowly disappear, BT will gradually monopolies the fibre market.

    10% of the country will still be on 2Mbps and UPTO 90% may get 24+ Mbps?

    All this is happening while other countries are going at it hammer and tongs laying FIBRE TO THE HOME.

    Roll on tomorrow.

  3. zemadeiran

    What a farce!

    £25 Billion expensive? We spend over 200 Billion per annum on housing benefit!

    OUR elected officials could easily spread the cost over a 10+ year period with broadband bonds to raise the capital….

    What a bunch of cunts.

    Yes I said it.

  4. As long as MPs get their emails on dead trees and civil servants employ consultants rooted in the industry we’ll have this problem. At least the Lords took the time and trouble to find out the facts, and history will remember them. Once a new generation of politicians come through the ranks they will have to put it all right. I just hope it won’t be too late. We can’t be held to ransom by this copper cabal for much longer… can we?

  5. James Argent

    A £200bn neo-Keynesian national infrastructure plan is fine, though. What antediluvian version of this doesn’t include broadband infrastructure?

    The prime minister and culture secretary recently joined Twitter. Barack Obama joined Twitter in March 2007 and appointed the country’s first CTO in April 2009. That really says all you need to know about this government’s digital awareness – in stark contrast to its citizens.

  6. Caroline

    The goverment is a joke. I live a close, front of the house looks on to a main road but the postcode is at the back. Every house in every street around me can get fibre optic apart from the 12 houses in the close. Tired all the companies but no joy. I live in a city for god sake!!

IMPORTANT: Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically). On mobile devices you may need to load the page in 'Desktop' mode to comment.


Comments RSS Feed

* Your comment might NOT appear immediately (the site cache re-syncs periodically) *
* Comments that break site rules, SPAM, TROLL or post via fake IP/anon proxy servers may be blocked *
Promotion
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • BT £0.00 (*15.00)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - 20GB
    * Gift: £125 Sainsburys Voucher
  • PlusNet £0.00 (*14.99)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £6.75 (*13.50)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: £100 Love2shop Voucher
  • Virgin Media £10.00 (*15.50)
    * Speed: 50Mbps - Unlimited (FUP)
    * Gift: None
  • WightFibre £12.50
    * Speed: 30Mbps - Unlimited (FUP)
    * Gift:
Poll
* Javascript must be ON to vote *
The Top 20 Category Tags
New Forum Topics
Promotion

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved (Terms, Privacy and Cookie Policy, Links (.), Website Rules)