» ISP News » 

New H265 Video Standard Could Help UK ISPs Manage Broadband Capacity

Posted Tuesday, January 29th, 2013 (10:07 am) by Mark Jackson (Score 1,182)
broadband internet video and movie streaming

The International Telecommunication Union’s recent approval of a new H.265 (ITU-T H.265 / ISO/IEC 23008-2 HEVC) video standard could help broadband ISPs to manage the growing burden of internet video traffic. Indeed some 720p HD video streams may soon be possible with a download speed of well under 1Mbps (Megabits/sec).

According to Cisco’s 2012 Visual Networking Index forecast, online video content and TV services are predicted to account for 54% of all consumer internet traffic by 2016 (currently 51%). The rise in consumption is being fuelled by a growing demand for services like YouTube, Netflix, LOVEFiLM, internet connected TV’s and a new generation of IPTV products (e.g. YouView from BT and TalkTalk).

On top of that the forthcoming Ultra HD (Ultra High Definition) video standards, such as 4K (3840 x 2160 pixels) and 8K (7680 x 4320 pixels), are slowly beginning to enter the market and should deliver streams that go well above the current best 1080p HDTV standard (1,920 x 1,080 pixels).

The recent developments are however a mixed blessing for broadband providers. On the one hand ISPs will welcome the prospect of a new selling point for their latest superfast and fibre broadband products, yet on the other they face an insatiable and rising demand for network capacity.

Trefor Davies, CTO of Business ISP Timico UK, said last year (here):

Now this is all very well and good but what will it mean for us men in the street? Well the amount of digital bandwidth needed to stream 8k video is around 350Mbps. If we assume that households will want to have multiple streams so that people can watch Big Brother, Coronation Street, Eastenders and the footy simultaneously in different rooms whilst sharing the experience with their friends via Telepresence it isn’t difficult to imagine a world where several Gigabits per second is required to the home.”

As we said last year, video streaming speeds vary from frame to frame based on many factors, such as the complexity of what they have to display and the method of encoding (codec). At present one of the best is H.264, which can optimise and compress even HD video streams to consume a comparatively small amount of speed and thus use less network capacity (saves money).

In fact it’s now possible to do some 1080p streams with a connection speed of just 3Mbps and surprisingly little quality loss, which is a huge improvement from the 10-20Mbps needed not so long ago. According to the ITU, some 80% of all web video is encoded using H.264 and from the above example it’s easy to see why (more for less).

Now, just when we thought the limits were close to being reached, the ITU has agreed to its replacement – H.265. The new standard supports High Efficiency Video Coding (HEVC), which needs only around half the bit rate of its predecessor, H.264, to do the same content and also supports the new UHDTV 4K and 8K standards.

One recent CES2012 demo by Broadcom showed H.265 being used to push a 720p video stream at a speed of less than 512Kbps (0.5Mbps), which is nothing short of astonishing and marks good news for ISPs which stand to see less strain on their capacity as the new standard is slowly adopted. Meanwhile consumers on slower connection speeds would also benefit.

In reality there are some trade-offs to the adoption of H.265 (i.e. not all current hardware and software supports H.265 and new codecs often need faster computers/devices), which could mean that it won’t be widely supported for awhile and by then the new 4K and 8K standards could have become mainstream. Back to square one, possibly.

Add to Diigo
Add to Slashdot
Leave a Comment
9 Responses
  1. Surely the focus here is that H.265 might help those of us that have slow connections on olde worlde 20CN Exchanges rather than the ISPs managing their capacity???

    • Yes but I felt that was obvious enough without having to state it. I will add an extra sentence though.

    • Stuart

      Win-win for everyone really. It’s not going to appear on Sat/Terrestrial TV until 4K, but everything else can benefit, so long as there is a software decoder.

      Wish adaptive bitrate streaming would be used more. Netflix works like a charm.

  2. Phil

    we want 1080P Full HD not 720P HD

  3. 3G Infinity

    Great to see this, will make video more useable. Word of caution, 1080p at 3Mbps on a 50″ plasma looks as good as SD, you still need 1080i at 8Mbps or 1080p at 16Mbps to get the most out of the TV.

    • I wouldn’t define video quality purely by connection speed as that won’t work; there are far too many influencing factors for a simple measure of speed to be effective, as per the above article.

      There are so many other factors involved too, such as how close you sit to the TV (many people put huge TV’s in small living rooms, which isn’t so good for your eyes). Furthermore some modern TV’s actually do stunningly good up-scaling (my Samsung can make some SD shows look almost like HD) and general display performance also varies.

    • 3G Infinity

      These are content streaming speeds and not connection speeds, connection speeds will be higher so that you can get the committed data rate needed.

      Agree TV placement etc and upscaling all have a part to play, however to get a true 1080p (not an upscaled 1080p) needs 16 to 20Mbps, and that is a reduction from the 56Mbps BBC uses on its low speed wireless connected cameras, which is a long way down from the 256Mbps used on fibre connected cameras for 1080p.

      I would like to see a push for higher stream rates, the technology in TVs going forward can utilise it.

    • Something else worth adding here, which I didn’t factor into the article, is that we’re likely to see a growing number of movies released in the future that support 48fps (e.g. The Hobbit) and 60fps. Obviously that’s an extra burden from the 24/30fps of normal but I doubt we’ll see this on video streaming services for awhile.

IMPORTANT: Javascript must be enabled to post (most browsers do this automatically). On mobile devices you may need to load the page in 'Desktop' mode to comment.

Comments RSS Feed

* Your comment might NOT appear immediately (the site cache re-syncs periodically) *
* Comments that break site rules, SPAM, TROLL or post via fake IP/anon proxy servers may be blocked *
Cheapest Superfast ISPs
  • SSE £0.00 (*20.00)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - Unlimited (FUP)
    * Gift: None
  • PlusNet £5.00 (*14.99)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: None
  • TalkTalk £5.00 (*17.50)
    * Speed: 38Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: £50 Love2shop
  • Virgin Media £6.99 (*19.00)
    * Speed: 50Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: None
  • Hyperoptic £9.00 (*22.00)
    * Speed: 100Mbps - Unlimited
    * Gift: None
* Javascript must be ON to vote *
The Top 20 Category Tags
  1. BT (1279)
  2. Broadband Delivery UK (978)
  3. FTTC (848)
  4. FTTP (743)
  5. Politics (623)
  6. Statistics (570)
  7. Openreach (568)
  8. Fibre Optic (546)
  9. Business (519)
  10. Mobile Broadband (495)
  11. Wireless Internet (428)
  12. 4G (393)
  13. Ofcom Regulation (389)
  14. Virgin Media (363)
  15. FTTH (305)
  16. Sky Broadband (303)
  17. TalkTalk (289)
  18. EE (241)
  19. Security (210)
  20. 3G (182)
New Forum Topics

Copyright © 1999 to Present - ISPreview.co.uk - All Rights Reserved - Terms  ,  Privacy and Cookie Policy  ,  Links  ,  Website Rules